Citation: | HONG Yifeng, CAI Gengyuan, WU Zhenfang. Effects of genealogical errors on the reliability of ssGBLUP to estimate breeding values[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(S1): 85-88. |
This study was aimed to study the influence of genealogical errors on the reliability of estimated breeding values (EBV) obtained by ssGBLUP. Under the condition of different heritabilities, reference groups and genealogical errors, effects of ssGBLUP, GBLUP and BLUP on the reliability of EBV were evaluated. Data were simulated using QMSim software and analyzed by BLUPf90 software. The results showed that the heritability degree and genealogical error rate had nothing to do with reliability of EBV. The tolerance of ssGBLUP to genealogical errors decreased gradually with the gradual increase of reference group. The reliability of EBV obtained by ssGBLUP decreased linearly with the increase of genealogical error rate.
[1] |
MEUWISSEN T H, HAYES B J, GODDARD M E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps[J]. Genetics, 2001, 157(4):1819-1829. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_1461589
|
[2] |
ROTHSCHILD M F, PLASTOW G S. Applications of genomics to improve livestock in the developing world[J]. Livest Sci, 2014, 166:76-83. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=2d408d9ab00fc1014b9669982718cb0d
|
[3] |
HEFFNER E L, SORRELLS M E, JANNINK J L. Genomic selection for crop improvement[J]. Crop Sci, 2017, 49(1):1-12. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwxb-e201804002
|
[4] |
TORO M A, SAURA J M, FERNANDEZ B, et al. Accuracy of genomic within-family selection in aquaculture breeding programmes[J]. J Anim Breed Genet, 2017, 134(3):256-263. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=c28636be57ed6d1186d7f3eee0976a05&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[5] |
OLSON K M, VANRADEN P M, TOOKER M E, et al. Differences among methods to validate genomic evaluations for dairy cattle[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2011, 94(5):2613-2620. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=c4d8d2546f7775850cfb5bbb1b549541
|
[6] |
PSZCZOLA M, CALUS M P L. Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations[J]. Animal, 2015, 10(6):7. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=85006c9de4792e48a649e532646b4851
|
[7] |
FRAGOMENI B O, LOURENCO D A L, TSURUTA S, et al. Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses:a simulation study[J]. J Anim Breed Genet, 2015, 132(5):340-345. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=d499268c38a1a038c82edc4cf81ad670&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[8] |
CHRISTENSEN O F, MADSEN P, NIELSEN B, et al. Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs[J]. Animal, 2012, 10(6):1565-1571. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=248101041d1010767e06ed15712ae9c7
|
[9] |
LEGARRA A, AGUILAR I, MISZTAL I. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information[J]. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92(9):4656-4663. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=188ec59a39ab78abc395679143ec3148
|
[10] |
SARGOLZAEI M, SCHENKEL F S. QMSim:A large-scale genome simulator for livestock[J]. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25(5):680-681. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ0211144284/
|
[11] |
MISZTAL I, TSURUTA S, STRABEL T, et al. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90)[C]//Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. 2002, 33: 743-744.
|
[12] |
YAMAGUCHI N, MACDONALD D W. The burden of Co-Occupancy:Intraspecific resource competition and spacing patterns in American mink, mustela vison[J]. J Mammal, 2003, 84(4):1341-1355. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=6714632191559c6817bec52e60c00b21&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|
[13] |
赵静.猪脸识别技术帮助金融机构获得牲畜"身份证"[J].农业知识, 2018(2):37. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=nyzs-kxyz201802026
|