Effects of different paddy-upland multiple cropping patterns on soil aggregates, carbon and nitrogen in paddy fields

LÜ Qingqing; LAO Chengyi; XU Huifang; HUANG Guoqin

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202407015

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2024 > 45(6): 949-955. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202407015

LÜ Qingqing, LAO Chengyi, XU Huifang, et al. Effects of different paddy-upland multiple cropping patterns on soil aggregates, carbon and nitrogen in paddy fields[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2024, 45(6): 949-955. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202407015

Citation:

PDF (909 KB)

Effects of different paddy-upland multiple cropping patterns on soil aggregates, carbon and nitrogen in paddy fields

Research Center on Ecological Science, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China

More Information

Received Date: July 11, 2024
Available Online: September 24, 2024
Published Date: September 25, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To investigate a paddy-upland multiple cropping model that is more conducive to the sustainable development of paddy fields in the southern region.
Method
A comparative field trial was conducted at the Science and Technology Park of Jiangxi Agricultural University to compare the paddy-upland multiple cropping models, including milk vetch-early rice-late rice (CK), milk vetch-early rice-late corn||late soybean (CRI), rape-early rice-late corn||late soybean (RRI), and rape-early rice-late rice (RRR).
Result
The levels of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents were both in the order of CK>RRR>CRI>RRI. In addition, The R_0.250 (content of aggregate with diameter ≥ 0.250 mm) values of planting milk vetch modes were higher than those of planting rape modes, the soil structures of planting milk vetch modes were more stable. Furthermore, the early rice yield of CRI mode was the highest among four treatments.
Conclusion
Adopting CRI mode of milk vetch-early rice-late corn||late soybean in the southern region is beneficial for the sustainable development of agriculture.
- Paddy-upland multiple cropping,
- Soil aggregate,
- Soil carbon and nitrogen,
- Crop yield,
- Rice field

FullText(HTML)

References (36)

References

[1]	周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 等. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315.
[2]	舒业勤, 彭复细, 雷文硕, 等. 稻油复种不同措施下土壤有机碳组分积累及其稳定性特征[J/OL]. 土壤学报 (2024-04-08) [2024-07-12]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1119.p.20240402.1444.002.
[3]	张玮, 周梦瑶, 张乐妍, 等. 多熟复种模式提高南方稻田土壤团聚体稳定性以及有机碳含量[J]. 华北农学报, 2023, 38(S1): 331-338. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20194109
[4]	HU Q, YANG B, LI N, et al. Effects of mixed sowing of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L. ) and rape on rice yield and soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Research on World Agricultural Economy, 2022, 3(1): 9-15. doi: 10.36956/rwae.v3i1.483
[5]	代雪宾, 田秀平, 赵秋, 等. 长期冬绿肥翻压对土壤有机氮组分的影响研究[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2023, 30(5): 11-15.
[6]	刘宁. 长江中游双季稻区稻田三熟制优化复种方式研究[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2023.
[7]	潘晓华, 李木英, 曾勇军, 等. 江西双季稻主要种植方式及其配套栽培对策[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2013, 35(1): 1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2013.01.001
[8]	黄国勤. 中国南方稻田耕作制度发展的成就、问题及战略对策[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2022, 41(1): 1-20.
[9]	YU X, XIAO S, YAN T, et al. Interspecific competition as affected by nitrogen application in sweet corn-soybean intercropping system[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(9): 2268. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13092268
[10]	张曼, 刘全俊, 汤永玉, 等. 玉米大豆间作对玉米产量及节肢动物群落的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2024, 61(2): 429-441.
[11]	胡开明, 陆万山. 大豆—玉米复合种植模式应用分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2024, 30(10): 23-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2024.10.006
[12]	LIU Y H, ZHONG Y Y, HU C, et al. Distribution of microplastics in soil aggregates after film mulching[J]. Soil Ecology Letters, 2023, 5(3): 230171. doi: 10.1007/s42832-023-0171-9
[13]	王敬宽, 吕鹏超, 张楷悦, 等. 不同土地利用方式对盐碱地土壤团聚体及碳氮含量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(10): 86-94.
[14]	李鉴霖, 江长胜, 郝庆菊. 土地利用方式对缙云山土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(12): 4695-4704.
[15]	黑杰, 李先德, 刘吉龙, 等. 轮作模式对农田土壤团聚体及碳氮含量的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2022, 20(3): 126-134.
[16]	阮文亮, 彭松, 祝晓慧, 等. 减量施氮与间作大豆对甜玉米土壤团聚体及有机碳含量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2023, 41(5): 811-819.
[17]	XU L, WANG M, XIE X, et al. Assessment of soil aggregation properties after conversion from rice to greenhouse organic cultivation on SOC controlling mechanism[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2020, 20(4): 1920-1930. doi: 10.1007/s11368-020-02589-0
[18]	张玉铭, 胡春胜, 陈素英, 等. 耕作与秸秆还田方式对碳氮在土壤团聚体中分布的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(9): 1558-1570.
[19]	杨卫君, 惠超, 邓天池, 等. 生物炭对砂壤土团聚体及其碳、氮分布的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(12): 1-9. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.21608
[20]	TANG H, LI C, SHI L, et al. Functional soil organic matter fraction in response to short-term tillage management under the double-cropping rice paddy field in southern of China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(35): 48438-48449. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14173-1
[21]	TANG H, LI C, SHI L, et al. Tillage with crop residue returning management increases soil microbial biomass turnover in the double-cropping rice fields of Southern China[J]. Agronomy, 2024, 14(2): 265. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14020265
[22]	陈明君, 盛荣, 张文钊, 等. 红壤稻田复种方式对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2023, 44(4): 692-700.
[23]	黄国勤. 江南丘陵区农田循环生产技术研究: Ⅰ: 江西绿肥生产的发展[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2008(2): 1-2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2239.2008.02.001
[24]	黄国勤. 南方稻田耕作制度可持续发展面临的十大问题[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2009(3): 1-2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2239.2009.03.001
[25]	EYNARD A, SCHUMACHER T E, LINDSTROM M J, et al. Aggregate sizes and stability in cultivated South Dakota prairie Ustolls and Usterts[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004, 68(4): 1360-1365. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.1360
[26]	朱贵平, 张惠琴, 吴增琪, 等. 紫云英和油菜不同时期翻压对土壤培肥效果的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2012, 43(2): 205-208. doi: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2012.02.205
[27]	熊瑞, 欧阳宁, 欧茜, 等. 秸秆还田与耕作方式对双季稻土壤团聚体及碳氮含量的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36(6): 1347-1356.
[28]	宋佳, 黄晶, 高菊生, 等. 冬种绿肥和秸秆还田对双季稻区土壤团聚体和有机质官能团的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 564-570.
[29]	李学文. 紫云英和油菜还田对土壤团聚体和有机碳固存的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2022.
[30]	刘陈, 王伟妮, 廖世鹏, 等. 我国油菜绿肥研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(11): 248-254. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.22665
[31]	黄雅楠. 绿肥还田下有机碳与矿物的结合特征及团聚体稳定性[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2023.
[32]	杨继芬, 李永梅, 李春培, 等. 大豆玉米间作提高红壤团聚体中真菌群落结构和多样性[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(5): 889-899. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2022522
[33]	陈小强, 范茂攀, 王自林, 等. 不同种植模式对云南省中部坡耕地水土保持的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(4): 48-52.
[34]	WU A L, JIAO X Y, WANG J S, et al. Sorghum rhizosphere effects reduced soil bacterial diversity by recruiting specific bacterial species under low nitrogen stress[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 770: 144742. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144742
[35]	CHEN Y, LI S, LIU N, et al. Effects of different types of microbial inoculants on available nitrogen and phosphorus, soil microbial community, and wheat growth in high-P soil[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(18): 23036-23047.
[36]	杜光辉, 张琳, 丁丽, 等. 紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配合氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮素营养平衡的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2024, 40(6): 1012-1019.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (611) PDF downloads (23)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of different paddy-upland multiple cropping patterns on soil aggregates, carbon and nitrogen in paddy fields

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content