LI Meijuan, ZHANG Huicheng, TANG Ying, et al. Effects of postponing nitrogen application on rice and carp growth and paddy field water quality in rice-fish co-culture system[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2024, 45(6): 878-888. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202406035
    Citation: LI Meijuan, ZHANG Huicheng, TANG Ying, et al. Effects of postponing nitrogen application on rice and carp growth and paddy field water quality in rice-fish co-culture system[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2024, 45(6): 878-888. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202406035

    Effects of postponing nitrogen application on rice and carp growth and paddy field water quality in rice-fish co-culture system

    More Information
    • Received Date: June 23, 2024
    • Available Online: September 04, 2024
    • Published Date: September 18, 2024
    • Objective 

      This study aims to explore the effects of postponing nitrogen fertilization in the rice-fish co-culture system on rice (Oryza sativa) yield and grain quality, nitrogen utilization rate, fish survival rate, fish yield, fish meat quality, as well as paddy field water quality. This research would provide a theoretical basis for stabilizing rice and fish yields and improving nitrogen utilization efficiency in rice fields under the rice-fish co-culture system.

      Method 

      The study used hybrid rice ‘Taifengyou 208’, conventional rice ‘19 Xiang’ and Cyprinus carpio variety ‘Ruyuanshili 1’ as experimental materials. Based on a total nitrogen application rate of 150 kg·hm−2 for early season and 180 kg·hm−2 for late season, three experimental treatments were designed: No nitrogen fertilizer application (M0), one-time basal nitrogen fertilizer application (M1, the top dressing fertilizer was not added), and postponing nitrogen application (M2, the mass ratio of basal fertilizer and top dressing fertilizer was 7∶3).

      Result 

      Compared to the M1 treatment, M2 treatment was more beneficial for improving the rice tiller numbers, leaf SPAD values and nitrogen absorption and utilization efficiency (REN) at heading stage, the REN of M2 treatment increased by 25.82%−91.11% and 62.74%−67.35% in early and late rice growing seasons respectively. There was no significant difference in milling quality and appearance quality of rice between M1 and M2 treatments. M2 treatment significantly increased the paddy water electrical conductivity, total nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, and nitrate nitrogen contents at rice panicle initial stage (P < 0.05), while significantly reduced the crude fat content in carp meat (P < 0.05). However, it had no significant effect on the survival rate or yield of fish.

      Conclusion 

      In the rice-fish co-culture system, postponing nitrogen application can stabilize rice and carp yield, improve nitrogen use efficiency, and reduce crude fat content of carp meat, with no significant effect on rice quality or the protein and total amino acid contents of carp meat.

    • [1]
      唐建军, 李巍, 吕修涛, 等. 中国稻渔综合种养产业的发展现状与若干思考[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(5): 1-10.
      [2]
      LIU X, SUN D, HUANG H, et al. Rice-fish coculture without phosphorus addition improves paddy soil nitrogen availability by shaping ammonia-oxidizing Archaea and bacteria in subtropical regions of South China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 927: 171642. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171642
      [3]
      REN L, LIU P, XU F, et al. Rice-fish coculture system enhances paddy soil fertility, bacterial network stability and keystone taxa diversity[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2023, 348: 108399.
      [4]
      XIE J, HU L, TANG J, et al. Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(50): E1381-E1387.
      [5]
      BERG H, TAM N T. Decreased use of pesticides for increased yields of rice and fish-options for sustainable food production in the Mekong Delta[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 619: 319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.062
      [6]
      GUO L, ZHAO L, YE J, et al. Using aquatic animals as partners to increase yield and maintain soil nitrogen in the paddy ecosystems[J]. eLife, 2022, 11: 73869. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73869
      [7]
      ZHANG D, WANG H, PAN J, et al. Nitrogen application rates need to be reduced for half of the rice paddy fields in China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 265: 8-14.
      [8]
      GUO Y, CHEN Y, SEARCHINGER T D, et al. Air quality, nitrogen use efficiency and food security in China are improved by cost-effective agricultural nitrogen management[J]. Nature Food, 2020, 1(10): 648-658. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00162-z
      [9]
      ZHOU Y, XU L, ZHANG J, et al. Low N apparent surplus with higher rice yield under long-term fertilizer postponing in the rice-wheat cropping system[J]. The Crop Journal, 2022, 10(4): 1178-1186. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2022.01.001
      [10]
      YAN J, WU Q, QI D, et al. Rice yield, water productivity, and nitrogen use efficiency responses to nitrogen management strategies under supplementary irrigation for rain-fed rice cultivation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 263: 107486.
      [11]
      HOU W, XUE X, LI X, et al. Interactive effects of nitrogen and potassium on: Grain yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of rice in low potassium fertility soil in China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 236: 14-23.
      [12]
      PAN J, LIU Y, ZHONG X, et al. Grain yield, water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of rice under different water management and fertilizer-N inputs in South China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2017, 184: 191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.01.013
      [13]
      GUO J, YANG S, GAO L, et al. Nitrogen nutrient index and leaf function affect rice yield and nitrogen efficiency[J]. Plant and Soil, 2019, 445(1): 7-21.
      [14]
      LIANG K, ZHONG X, PAN J, et al. Reducing nitrogen surplus and environmental losses by optimized nitrogen and water management in double rice cropping system of South China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 286: 106680.
      [15]
      WANG J, FU P, WANG F, et al. Optimizing nitrogen management to balance rice yield and environmental risk in the Yangtze River’s middle reaches[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(5): 4901-4912. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3943-5
      [16]
      国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家食品药品监督管理总局. 食品安全国家标准 食品中脂肪的测定: GB 5009.6—2016[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
      [17]
      国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 大米: GB/T 1354—2018[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018.
      [18]
      CAI S, ZHAO X, PITTELKOW C M, et al. Optimal nitrogen rate strategy for sustainable rice production in China[J]. Nature, 2023, 615: 73-79. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05678-x
      [19]
      袁帅. 氮肥运筹对湘南双季杂交稻产量、品质及氮利用效率的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2023.
      [20]
      王宇智. 氮肥运筹对旱直播水稻产量、品质及氮素利用率的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020.
      [21]
      段小丽, 张富林, 倪承凡, 等. 前氮后移对水稻产量形成和田面水氮素动态变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(1): 255-261.
      [22]
      RUAN S, ZHUANG Y, ZHANG L, et al. Improved estimation of nitrogen dynamics in paddy surface water in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 312: 114932. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114932
      [23]
      唐金玉, 王岩, 戴杨鑫, 等. 不同施肥方法对鱼蚌综合养殖池塘浮游植物群落结构的影响[J]. 水产学报, 2014, 38(9): 1421-1430.
      [24]
      QI D, YAN J, ZHU J. Effect of a reduced fertilizer rate on the water quality of paddy fields and rice yields under fishpond effluent irrigation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 231: 105999.
      [25]
      MBAABU P. Growth performance of tilapia in different culture systems on varying input amounts and aquaculture technologies adoption in Meru County, Kenya[D]. Nairobi: Kenyatta University, 2021.
      [26]
      韩军, 程红军, 侯宇刚. 不同粪肥对水产养殖肥水效果的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医科技信息, 2019(1): 24-25.
      [27]
      曲兆凯. 宁夏稻渔模式水肥调控、放蟹密度和饲料投喂量对水稻及鱼蟹产量和品质的影响[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2021.
      [28]
      REZENDE F P, LIMA A F. Effect of pond fertilization on growth performance of pirarucu (Arapaima gigas) during grow-out phase[J]. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 2022, 50(1): 22-30. doi: 10.3856/vol50-issue1-fulltext-2617

    Catalog

      Article views (284) PDF downloads (28) Cited by()

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return