Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of 100 cherry tomatoes based on different evaluation methods

CHEN Xiang; LIU Yiyang; LUO Lu; CHENG Guoxin; GUO Meng; GAO Yanming; LI Jianshe; WANG Xiaomin

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202401029

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2025 > 46(1): 62-71. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202401029

CHEN Xiang, LIU Yiyang, LUO Lu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of 100 cherry tomatoes based on different evaluation methods[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2025, 46(1): 62-71. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202401029

Citation:

PDF (723 KB)

Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of 100 cherry tomatoes based on different evaluation methods

CHEN Xiang^1,,
LIU Yiyang¹,
LUO Lu¹,
CHENG Guoxin^{1, 2},
GUO Meng^{1, 2},
GAO Yanming^{1, 2},
LI Jianshe^{1, 2},
WANG Xiaomin^{1, 2, ,}

1.
College of Enology and Horticulture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
2.
Ningxia Modern Facility Horticulture Engineering Technology Research Center/Key Laboratory of Modern Molecular Breeding for Dominant and Special Crops in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750021, China

More Information

Received Date: January 22, 2024
Available Online: December 09, 2024
Published Date: December 16, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
In order to explore the adaptability of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme) germplasm resources, and evaluate the excellent cherry tomato breeding materials suitable for new varieties breeding in Yinchuan Plain area.
Method
Totally 100 cherry tomato germplasm resources were collected as research objects, and the main phenotypic traits were determined. The adaptability was comprehensively evaluated by three different evaluation methods, multivariate statistical method, grey correlation analysis method and DTOPSIS method. The comprehensive score was calculated based on the principal component, the weighted correlation degree was calculated by the grey correlation degree method, and the relative proximity degree was calculated by the DTPOSIS method.
Result
The coefficient of variation of the main phenotypic traits of 100 cherry tomatoes ranged from 17.78% to 306.46%, and there were significant or extremely significant correlations among most of the traits. The 26 phenotypic traits were integrated into 10 principal components, with a cumulative contribution rate of 71.901%. The ranking of various qualities under the three evaluation methods showed both uniformity and difference. A total of four materials were ranked in the top 10, namely, T55, T83, T42 and T87 under all three methods, indicating that T55, T83, T42 and T87 were excellent germplasms, and T55 was the best.
Conclusion
T55 is the most suitable germplasm material for cultivation in Yinchuan Plain, and can be used as an important basic material for breeding. The evaluation results of the above three methods are slightly different, but there is no huge difference, which shows that the methods are feasible and beneficial to the research of germplasm resource evaluation.
- Cherry tomato,
- Germplasm resource,
- Multivariate statistics,
- Grey correlation analysis,
- DTOPSIS method,
- Comprehensive evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References (32)

References

[1]	赵宇飞, 王晓敏, 袁东升, 等. 18个樱桃番茄自交系数量性状的配合力和遗传力分析[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(12): 2011-2018.
[2]	黄婷, 周园园, 龚奕杰, 等. 昆山地区樱桃番茄新品种筛选试验及综合评价[J]. 中国种业, 2023(11): 77-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-895X.2023.11.019
[3]	RENUKA D M, SADASHIVA A T, AMBREESH S, et al. Path coefficient analysis for yield and quality Componets in cherrytomato (Solanum lycopersicum var. Cerasiforme)[J]. Plant Archives, 2017, 17(2): 1350-1352.
[4]	MACIEL G M, FINZI R R, CARVALHO F J, et al. Agronomic performance and genetic dissimilarity among cherry tomato genotypes[J]. Horticultura Brasileira, 2018, 36(2): 167-172. doi: 10.1590/s0102-053620180203
[5]	VENKADESWARAN E, VETHAMONI P I, ARUMUGAM T, et al. Evaluation and selection of cherry tomato [Solanum lycopersicum (L.) var. cerasiforme Mill.] genotypes for growth and yield contributing characters[J]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2018, 7(06): 1155-1165.
[6]	裴芸, 徐秀红, 陆锦彪, 等. 151份贵州地方樱桃番茄资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2022, 34(2): 310-316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2022.02.12
[7]	陈文星, 杨琳懿, 唐军荣, 等. 10个新樟属植物叶片表型性状多样性分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(12): 83-93.
[8]	田启建, 赵致, 叶玉龙. 14份国外番茄种质资源综合性状评价[J]. 种子, 2008, 27(3): 51-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2008.03.016
[9]	文军琴, 闫超凡, 邵登魁, 等. 50份番茄品种在青海高原地区的适应性综合评价[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2023(9): 48-57.
[10]	芮文婧, 张倩男, 王晓敏, 等. 47份大果番茄种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(12): 92-95.
[11]	赵云霞, 颜秀娟, 裴红霞, 等. 基于DTOPSIS法的日光温室大果番茄组合比较分析与评价[J]. 蔬菜, 2022(2): 13-18.
[12]	王晓敏, 刘珮君, 郑福顺, 等. 宁夏露地夏茬大果番茄杂交组合的综合评价[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(1): 160-170.
[13]	李锡香, 杜永臣. 番茄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[14]	WILLIAMS G, YESUDHAS A. Qualitative characterization and clustering in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. ) germplasm accessions[J]. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 2023, 15(3): 900-907. doi: 10.31018/jans.v15i3.4523
[15]	孙艳楠, 路耿新, 李冠义, 等. 燕麦种质资源形态学性状的遗传多样性[J]. 西北植物学报, 2023, 43(12): 1-10.
[16]	HERISON C, SUTJAHJO S H, SULASTRINI I, et al. Genetic diversity analysis in 27 tomato accessions using morphological and molecular markers[J]. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science, 2018, 40(1): 36-44.
[17]	高艳娜, 牛华琳, 李营, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对不同番茄品种的综合评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(12): 106-113.
[18]	周艳超, 薛坤, 葛海燕, 等. 基于主成分与聚类分析的樱桃番茄品质综合评价[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(12): 2320-2329. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.12.12
[19]	王瑞, 何之龙, 张震, 等. 基于主成分分析及隶属函数法评价氮素形态对油茶苗木的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(10): 11-19.
[20]	庞胜群, 赵飏, 李格. 灰色关联分析法综合评价不同品种加工番茄的品质[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 24(6): 682-684.
[21]	潘光辉, 尹贤贵, 杨琦凤, 等. 运用灰色关联度分析法评价微型番茄品种[J]. 西南农业学报, 2009, 22(1): 133-135. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2009.01.033
[22]	姜永平, 刘水东, 薛晨霞, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在番茄品种综合评价中的应用比较[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(22): 259-263.
[23]	姜丽霞, 任军荣, 张智, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在春油菜新品种综合评价中的应用比较[J]. 北方农业学报, 2023, 51(4): 88-95. doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2023.04.11
[24]	宋慧, 郭岩, 邢璐, 等. 基于灰色关联度、DTOPSIS与灰色局势决策法的谷子品种综合评价[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(11): 42-56. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2023.11.04
[25]	姚宗泽, 伊应良, 杨肖艳, 等. 基于熵权的DTOPSIS法和灰色局势决策法对云南杂交玉米新组合的评价分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(6): 86-93.
[26]	陈阿敏, 裴芸, 徐秀红, 等. 贵州地方樱桃番茄资源产量品质比较分析[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(12): 75-82.
[27]	吴国江, 周伟, 余忠浩, 等. 基于主成分、灰色关联和DTOPSIS分析的176份糯高粱种质资源综合评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2023, 52(5): 40-51.
[28]	常幸远, 祁玉良, 扶定, 等. 灰色关联度分析法和DTOPSIS法在两系杂交粳稻品种综合评价中的应用研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2023, 38(5): 26-31.
[29]	袁莉, 姜波. 加工番茄可溶性固形物含量与相关性状的关联研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2011, 42(4): 504-507. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2011.04.025
[30]	李国花, 王晓敏, 胡新华, 等. 基于Dtopsis法综合评价宁夏日光温室50个粉果番茄杂交组合[J]. 华北农学报, 2022, 37(z1): 35-43.
[31]	侯晓静, 姜波. 加工番茄品质性状与番茄红素的灰色关联分析[J]. 农机化研究, 2014(3): 54-57.
[32]	杨生保, 余庆辉, 王柏柯, 等. 加工番茄引种试验的灰色关联度分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2006, 43(4): 294-298.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	柯欣，费琪，夏馨蕊，叶建仁，朱丽华. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松胚性愈伤组织诱导及体胚产量影响因素的研究. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 87-94 .
2.	刘阳，郭文冰，薛蕾，王哲，曾明，欧阳曦，伍彩云，车晓亮. 湿地松抗褐变和易褐变无性系胚性愈伤团的生理生化特征. 林业与环境科学. 2025(01): 9-21 .
3.	王斯彤，张柏习，王曼，王浩，孟鹏. 樟子松无性系(GS1)胚性愈伤组织的初步诱导. 分子植物育种. 2023(18): 6088-6095 .
4.	程方，叶建仁. 抗性湿地松胚性愈伤组织的维持与增殖. 绿色科技. 2023(14): 1-7+27 .
5.	程方，孙婷玉，叶建仁. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松未成熟合子胚胚性愈伤组织的诱导. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(06): 175-182 .
6.	高启阳，黄宇龙，郭文冰，赵奋成，刘阳. 碳源等因素对湿地松优良无性系胚性愈伤组织增殖的影响. 植物研究. 2022(01): 21-28 .
7.	胡珊，杨春霞，谷振军，杜强，肖平江，李火根. 火炬松体细胞胚胎发生体系的优化. 林业科学研究. 2022(03): 9-17 .
8.	徐康，程强强，杨春霞，谷振军，丁伟，李火根. 速生湿地松良种胚性愈伤组织诱导与增殖. 广西植物. 2021(02): 283-291 .
9.	程子珊，易敏，宋才玲，程强强，黄若，邓诏磊，张莹莹，张露. 湿地松体细胞胚胎发生胚性愈伤组织诱导条件优化. 江西农业大学学报. 2021(05): 1054-1064 .

Other cited types(5)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views PDF downloads Cited by(14)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of 100 cherry tomatoes based on different evaluation methods

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

Other cited types(5)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content