HU Jie, GONG Changwei, YUAN Hao, et al. Interspecific relationships between Rhopalosiphum rufiabdominalis and Sogatella furcifera mediated by rice secondary metabolites[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2023, 44(5): 735-741. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202305006
    Citation: HU Jie, GONG Changwei, YUAN Hao, et al. Interspecific relationships between Rhopalosiphum rufiabdominalis and Sogatella furcifera mediated by rice secondary metabolites[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2023, 44(5): 735-741. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202305006

    Interspecific relationships between Rhopalosiphum rufiabdominalis and Sogatella furcifera mediated by rice secondary metabolites

    More Information
    • Received Date: May 07, 2023
    • Available Online: November 12, 2023
    • Published Date: July 06, 2023
    • Objective 

      To explore the interaction mechanism between species of Sogatella furcifera (white-backed planthopper) and Rhopalosiphum rufiabdominalis (aphid), and the role of secondary metabolites in rice during the interaction between the two insects.

      Method 

      S. furcifera and R. rufiabdominalis were mixed in different proportions, and the total egg production and average daily spawning of white-backed planthopper adults were analyzed after pairing. The contents of oxalic acid, flavones and total phenols of each treated rice seedlings were determined, and the differences in compositions of secondary metabolites were analyzed by GC/MS instrument.

      Result 

      The total egg production of white-backed planthoppers treated with “15 aphids + 5 white-backed planthoppers” was only 131.67 grains, which was significantly different from that of “20 white-backed planthoppers” (214.60 grains), and the average daily fecundity was the same. The contents of rice flavones and total phenols treated with “15 aphids + 5 white-backed planthoppers” were 1.98 and 63.71 mg/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of other treatments. GC/MS analysis showed that the relative content of probucol in rice treated with “15 aphids + 5 white-backed planthoppers” was as high as 75.78%, while this phenolic substance was not present in the rest of the treatments.

      Conclusion 

      R. rufiabdominalis may inhibit the reproductive ability of S. furcifera through stimulating rice to promote the content of flavones and total phenols. The probucol may play a key role in the interaction between S. furcifera and R. rufiabdominalis.

    • [1]
      陈堑. 麦长管蚜与禾谷缢管蚜种间竞争的研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2010.
      [2]
      邱良妙, 刘其全, 陈秀琴, 等. 六斑月瓢虫对草地贪夜蛾低龄幼虫的捕食作用[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2023, 39(2): 471-477.
      [3]
      张晓明, 徐海云, 杨念婉, 等. 两种蚜小蜂对烟粉虱MED隐种的田间笼罩控效评价[J]. 植物保护学报, 2018, 45(6): 1281-1288.
      [4]
      KAPLAN I, DENNO R F. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: A quantitative assessment of competition theory[J]. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10(10): 977-994. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01093.x
      [5]
      刘晓飞, 陈强, 叶辉. 桔小实蝇与番石榴实蝇幼虫的种间竞争研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2014, 36(1): 33-38.
      [6]
      禹云超, 郅军锐, 曾广, 等. 入侵种西花蓟马与其它昆虫的种间竞争[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2020, 42(1): 94-100.
      [7]
      ANDERSON P, SADEK M M, WÄCKERS F L. Root herbivory affects oviposition and feeding behavior of a foliar herbivore[J]. Behavioral Ecology, 2011, 22(6): 1272-1277. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arr124
      [8]
      李建领. 寄主植物介导的枸杞瘿螨和枸杞木虱种间互作关系研究[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2019.
      [9]
      ZHAO H P, ZHANG X Y, XUE M, et al. Feeding of whitefly on tobacco decreases aphid performance via increased salicylate signaling[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(9): e0138584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138584.
      [10]
      陈华才. 挥发物在水稻−二化螟、稻纵卷叶螟−二化螟绒茧蜂、螟蛉绒茧蜂相互关系中的作用[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2002.
      [11]
      张茂新, 凌冰, 庞雄飞. 非嗜食植物中的昆虫产卵驱避物及其利用[J]. 昆虫天敌, 2003, 25(1): 28-36.
      [12]
      张钰明. 三氟苯嘧啶介导的核受体USP过表达对白背飞虱生殖发育的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2022.
      [13]
      段立珍, 汪建飞, 赵建荣. 比色法测定菠菜中草酸含量的条件研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(3): 632-633.
      [14]
      李明阳, 姚宇波, 徐翔, 等. 几种水稻对褐飞虱的抗性鉴定及抗性相关次生物质分析[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2020, 57(6): 1375-1384.
      [15]
      蔡文国, 吴卫, 邵金凤, 等. Folin-Ciocalteu法测定鱼腥草多酚的含量[J]. 食品科学, 2010, 31(14): 201-204.
      [16]
      PENG L, ZHAO Y, WANG H Y, et al. Comparative metabolomics of the interaction between rice and the brown planthopper[J]. Metabolomics, 2016, 12(8): 28746-28764.
      [17]
      DENNO R F, MCCLURE M S, OTT J R. Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects: Competition reexamined and resurrected[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1995, 40: 297-331. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001501
      [18]
      石永秀, 上官超智, 王婷婷, 等. 黑豆蚜与豌豆蚜的种间竞争及密度效应[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2022, 59(4): 862-873.
      [19]
      吴佳昊, 黄波, 王德辉, 等. 光肩星天牛与星天牛种间竞争行为研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2022, 44(3): 651-657. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2022.03.16
      [20]
      张祥, 刘长仲, 宋维虎. 不同CO2浓度条件下两种色型豌豆蚜的种群密度效应[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(3): 78-83+92.
      [21]
      王健立, 李洪刚, 马志国, 等. 西花蓟马与烟蓟马在紫甘蓝上的种间竞争[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(24): 5006-5012. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.24.005
      [22]
      闫文静, 王俊刚, 张玉栋, 等. 棉长管蚜和棉蚜对受蚜虫取食胁迫棉花植株的选择行为[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(1): 52-60.
      [23]
      PAPADOPOULOU G V, DAM N M. Mechanisms and ecological implications of plant-mediated interactions between belowground and aboveground insect herbivores[J]. Ecological Research, 2017, 32(1): 13-26. doi: 10.1007/s11284-016-1410-7
      [24]
      NGUYEN D, RIEU I, MARIANI C, et al. How plants handle multiple stresses: Hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2016, 91(6): 727-740. doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0481-8
      [25]
      纪祥龙, 刘长庆, 胡玲玲, 等. 桃蚜与萝卜蚜交互为害对寄主氮营养及蚜虫种间竞争的调节[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(4): 97-101.
      [26]
      SOLER R, BEZEMER T M, CORTESERO A M, et al. Impact of foliar herbivory on the development of a root-feeding insect and its parasitoid[J]. Oecologia, 2007, 152(2): 257-264. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0649-z
      [27]
      马广民. 朱砂叶螨取食诱导的棉花防御反应及其对棉蚜发育的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017.
      [28]
      WALLING L L. Avoiding effective defenses: Strategies employed by phloem-feeding insects[J]. Plant Physiology, 2008, 146(3): 859-866. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.113142
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(2)

      1. 李延实,李成芳. 不同再生稻栽培模式氮足迹及经济效益评估. 中国生态农业学报(中英文). 2024(04): 582-591 .
      2. 潘丽燕,谢鸿光,沈绪波,黄康德,徐淑英. 优质香型水稻新品种福玉香占的选育与应用. 福建农业科技. 2023(12): 62-66 .

      Other cited types(1)

    Catalog

      Article views (98) PDF downloads (22) Cited by(3)

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return