Citation: | GAO Yu, ZENG Ruier, YAO Suzhe, et al. Screening and evaluation indicators for peanut nitrogen-sensitive cultivars[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2023, 44(5): 794-802. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202302002 |
To characterize the response of different peanut cultivars to nitrogen.
A total of 81 peanut cultivars from all over China were used as materials, and two field treatments of normal nitrogen application and low nitrogen application were set up. Nineteen indexes, including chlorophyll content at the seedling stage as well as yield, dry matter accumulation and agronomic traits at the harvest stage, were measured in 81 peanut cultivars. The nitrogen response coefficients of the measured 19 indicators were used as the basis for principal component analysis, six new independent composite indicators were screened out, and the D values for comprehensive evaluation of peanut nitrogen sensitivity were obtained by calculating their affiliation function values and the weights of each composite indicator. The peanut cultivars were classified by cluster analysis. The correlations between nitrogen response coefficients and indicators of different types of peanut cultivars were further analyzed.
The 81 peanut cultivars were divided into nitrogen-sensitive (13), intermediate (33) and nitrogen-insensitive (35) cultivars. Under normal nitrogen application treatments, the response of nitrogen-insensitive peanut cultivars did not differ significantly in agronomic traits, but the increase in yield and dry matter accumulation of nitrogen-sensitive and intermediate peanut cultivars were significantly higher than those of nitrogen-insensitive cultivars. Correlation analysis of different traits showed that nitrogen application mainly affected peanut yield formation by influencing peanut dry matter accumulation and distribution and plant structure.
Chlorophyll content at seedling stage, single plant productivity and dry matter accumulation at harvest stage can be used as screening indicators for peanut nitrogen-sensitive cultivars, and the results of the study can provide a basis for screening and breeding of nitrogen-efficient cultivars of peanut.
[1] |
戴良香, 张智猛, 张冠初, 等. 氮肥用量对花生氮素吸收与分配的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(2): 370-375. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.02.0370
|
[2] |
王响玲, 宋柏权. 氮肥利用率的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(5): 93-97.
|
[3] |
巨晓棠, 谷保静. 我国农田氮肥施用现状、问题及趋势[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4): 783-795.
|
[4] |
刘兆辉, 薄录吉, 李彦, 等. 氮肥减量施用技术及其对作物产量和生态环境的影响综述[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(4): 1-8. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20160401
|
[5] |
周伟, 吕腾飞, 杨志平, 等. 氮肥种类及运筹技术调控土壤氮素损失的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9): 3051-3058. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.022
|
[6] |
雒文鹤, 师祖姣, 王旭敏, 等. 节水减氮对土壤硝态氮分布和冬小麦水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(6): 924-936.
|
[7] |
申丹丹, 牛轶男, 朱敏, 等. 氮、硫肥配施对稻茬麦氮素利用及籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 42(2): 1-8.
|
[8] |
任科宇. 氮肥优化减施和有机肥替代下我国粮食作物的氮肥利用率[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2020.
|
[9] |
郑永美, 冯昊, 吴正锋, 等. 氮肥调控对土壤供氮特征及花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2016, 38(4): 481-486. doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2016.04.011
|
[10] |
孙虎, 李尚霞, 王月福, 等. 施氮量对不同花生品种积累氮素来源和产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(1): 153-157.
|
[11] |
张翔, 张新友, 毛家伟, 等. 施氮水平对不同花生品种产量与品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(6): 1417-1423.
|
[12] |
刘颖, 张佳蕾, 李新国, 等. 豆科作物氮素高效利用机制研究进展[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2022, 44(3): 476-482. doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2021123
|
[13] |
山东省农业科学院. 花生栽培观察记载技术规范: NY/T 2408—2013[S]. (2013-09-10)[2022-10-01]. 北京: 中华人民共和国农业农村部.
|
[14] |
武姣娜, 魏晓东, 李霞, 等. 植物氮素利用效率的研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2018, 54(9): 1401-1408. doi: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2018.0071
|
[15] |
ZHANG Z, HU B, CHU C. Towards understanding the hierarchical nitrogen signalling network in plants[J]. Current Opinion Plant Biology, 2020, 55: 60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.03.006
|
[16] |
王春晓, 凌飞, 鹿泽启, 等. 不同氮效率花生品种氮素累积与利用特征[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(11): 1706-1713.
|
[17] |
蒋春姬, 郭佩, 王晓光, 等. 花生氮高效品种资源的苗期筛选研究[J]. 花生学报, 2020, 49(3): 40-45. doi: 10.14001/j.issn.1002-4093.2020.03.006
|
[18] |
NGUYEN H T T, VAN PHAM C, BERTIN P. The effect of nitrogen concentration on nitrogen use efficiency and related parameters in cultivated rices (Oryza sativa L. subsp. indica and japonica and O. glaberrima Steud. ) in hydroponics[J]. Euphytica, 2014, 198(1): 137-151. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1101-9
|
[19] |
XIE X, LI X, ZEBARTH B J, et al. Rapid screening of potato cultivars tolerant to nitrogen deficiency using a hydroponic system[J]. American Journal of Potato Research, 2018, 95(2): 157-163. doi: 10.1007/s12230-017-9621-1
|
[20] |
苏继霞, 王开勇, 费聪, 等. 氮肥运筹对滴灌甜菜产量、氮素吸收和氮素平衡的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2016, 47(6): 1404-1408. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2016.06.19
|
[21] |
武继承, 杨永辉, 康永亮, 等. 氮磷配施对玉米生长和养分利用的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(10): 68-71. doi: 10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2011.10.028
|
[22] |
陈杨, 徐孟泽, 王玉红, 等. 有效积温与不同供氮水平夏玉米干物质和氮素积累定量化研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(15): 2973-2987. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.15.009
|
[23] |
田艺心, 曹鹏鹏, 高凤菊, 等. 减氮施肥对间作玉米−大豆生长性状及经济效益的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(11): 109-113.
|
[24] |
KADER M A, JAHANGIR M M R, ISLAM M R, et al. Long-term conservation agriculture increases nitrogen use efficiency by crops, land equivalent ratio and soil carbon stock in a subtropical rice-based cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2022, 287: 108636. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108636.
|
[25] |
BÜCHI L, CHARLES R, SCHNEIDER D, et al. Performance of eleven winter wheat varieties in a long term experiment on mineral nitrogen and organic fertilisation[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 191: 111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.02.022
|
[26] |
SU W, KAMRAN M, XIE J, et al. Shoot and root traits of summer maize hybrid varieties with higher grain yields and higher nitrogen use efficiency at low nitrogen application rates[J]. PeerJ, 2019, 7: e7294. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7294.
|
[27] |
程红, 郑顺林, 马海艳, 等. 马铃薯氮高效基因型品种筛选及指标评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(10): 2292-2298. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.10.006
|
[28] |
王准, 张恒恒, 董强, 等. 棉花耐低氮和氮敏感种质筛选及验证[J]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(6): 538-551. doi: 10.11963/1002-7807.wzsmz.20201023
|