- Chinese Core Journal
- Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source journal
- Journal of Citation Report of Chinese S&T Journals (Core Edition)
| Citation: |
HUANG Jiyue, WANG Cong, WANG Yingxiang. Advances in molecular genetic mechanism of meiotic recombination and applications in crop breeding[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2022, 43(6): 17-35. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202208059
|
Meiosis is essential for producing haploid gametes during sexual reproduction in most eukaryotes. Homologous recombination is one of the critical events of meiosis prophase I. It not only leads to the reshuffle of genetic information between homologs, but also ensures their proper segregation at anaphase I. Therefore, meiotic recombination is important to facilitate the genetic diversity and evolution among progeny, and also provides the theoretical basis for crop breeding. As expectedly, increasing the frequency of recombination or changing its distribution can benefit crop breeding, while reducing or inhibiting recombination can sustain heterosis. Over the past decades, numerous achievements have been made in understanding and utilizing meiotic recombination in plants, including mechanisms on genetic and epigenetic regulation of meiotic recombination, manipulation technologies on recombination, fixation of heterosis and chromosome engineering. In this review, we summarize the latest findings and technologies for regulating meiotic recombination, which will enable the readers to have an easy access to understand meiotic recombination, and also expand the idea of manipulating breeding through meiotic recombination.
| [1] |
BLAT Y, PROTACIO R U, HUNTER N, et al. Physical and functional interactions among basic chromosome organizational features govern early steps of meiotic chiasma formation[J]. Cell, 2002, 111(6): 791-802. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01167-4
|
| [2] |
ARMSTRONG S J, CARYL A P, JONES G H, et al. Asy1, a protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis, localizes to axis-associated chromatin in Arabidopsis and Brassica [J]. Journal of Cell Science, 2002, 115(Pt 18): 3645-3655.
|
| [3] |
FERDOUS M, HIGGINS J D, OSMAN K, et al. Inter-homolog crossing-over and synapsis in Arabidopsis meiosis are dependent on the chromosome axis protein AtASY3[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2012, 8(2): e1002507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002507.
|
| [4] |
KEENEY S, GIROUX C N, KLECKNER N. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family[J]. Cell, 1997, 88(3): 375-384. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81876-0
|
| [5] |
VRIELYNCK N, CHAMBON A, VEZON D, et al. A DNA topoisomerase VI-like complex initiates meiotic recombination[J]. Science, 2016, 351(6276): 939-943. doi: 10.1126/science.aad5196
|
| [6] |
SUGIMOTO-SHIRASU K, STACEY N J, CORSAR J, et al. DNA topoisomerase VI is essential for endoreduplication in Arabidopsis[J]. Current Biology, 2002, 12(20): 1782-1786. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01198-3
|
| [7] |
STACEY N J, KUROMORI T, AZUMI Y, et al. Arabidopsis SPO11-2 functions with SPO11-1 in meiotic recombination[J]. The Plant Journal, 2006, 48(2): 206-216. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02867.x
|
| [8] |
NEALE M J, PAN J, KEENEY S. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks[J]. Nature, 2005, 436(7053): 1053-1057. doi: 10.1038/nature03872
|
| [9] |
DE MUYT A, PEREIRA L, VEZON D, et al. A high throughput genetic screen identifies new early meiotic recombination functions in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2009, 5(9): e1000654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000654.
|
| [10] |
JI J H, TANG D, SHEN Y, et al. P31comet, a member of the synaptonemal complex, participates in meiotic DSB formation in rice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(38): 10577-10582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607334113
|
| [11] |
WANG Y X, COPENHAVER G P. Meiotic recombination: Mixing it up in plants[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2018, 69: 577-609. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040431
|
| [12] |
MIAO C, TANG D, ZHANG H, et al. Central region component1, a novel synaptonemal complex component, is essential for meiotic recombination initiation in rice[J]. The Plant Cell, 2013, 25(8): 2998-3009. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113175
|
| [13] |
PANIZZA S, MENDOZA M A, BERLINGER M, et al. Spo11-accessory proteins link double-strand break sites to the chromosome axis in early meiotic recombination[J]. Cell, 2011, 146(3): 372-383. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.003
|
| [14] |
LAMBING C, TOCK A J, TOPP S D, et al. Interacting genomic landscapes of REC8-cohesin, chromatin, and meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2020, 32(4): 1218-1239. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00866
|
| [15] |
LAMBING C, KUO P C, TOCK A J, et al. ASY1 acts as a dosage-dependent antagonist of telomere-led recombination and mediates crossover interference in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117(24): 13647-13658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921055117
|
| [16] |
LAM I, KEENEY S. Mechanism and regulation of meiotic recombination initiation[J]. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 2014, 7(1): a016634. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016634.
|
| [17] |
UANSCHOU C, SIWIEC T, PEDROSA-HARAND A, et al. A novel plant gene essential for meiosis is related to the human CtIP and the yeast COM1/SAE2 gene[J]. The EMBO Journal, 2007, 26(24): 5061-5070. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601913
|
| [18] |
OSMAN K, HIGGINS J D, SANCHEZ-MORAN E, et al. Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. New Phytologist, 2011, 190(3): 523-544. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03665.x
|
| [19] |
WATERWORTH W M, ALTUN C, ARMSTRONG S J, et al. NBS1 is involved in DNA repair and plays a synergistic role with ATM in mediating meiotic homologous recombination in plants[J]. The Plant Journal, 2007, 52(1): 41-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03220.x
|
| [20] |
JI J H, TANG D, WANG M J, et al. MRE11 is required for homologous synapsis and DSB processing in rice meiosis[J]. Chromosoma, 2013, 122(5): 363-376. doi: 10.1007/s00412-013-0421-1
|
| [21] |
JI J, TANG D, WANG K, et al. The role of OsCOM1 in homologous chromosome synapsis and recombination in rice meiosis [J] The Plant Journal, 2012, 72(1): 18-30.
|
| [22] |
TSUBOUCHI H, OGAWA H. Exo1 roles for repair of DNA double-strand breaks and meiotic crossing over in Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 2000, 11(7): 2221-2233. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.7.2221
|
| [23] |
HU Q, TANG D, WANG H J, et al. The exonuclease homolog OsRAD1 promotes accurate meiotic double-strand break repair by suppressing nonhomologous end joining[J]. Plant Physiology, 2016, 172(2): 1105-1116.
|
| [24] |
CHE L X, WANG K J, TANG D, et al. OsHUS1 facilitates accurate meiotic recombination in rice[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2014, 10(6): e1004405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004405.
|
| [25] |
WOLD M S. Replication protein A: A heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism[J]. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 1997, 66(1): 61-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.61
|
| [26] |
SHI B L, XUE J Y, YIN H, et al. Dual functions for the ssDNA-binding protein RPA in meiotic recombination[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2019, 15(2): e1007952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007952.
|
| [27] |
BROWN M S, BISHOP D K. DNA strand exchange and RecA homologs in meiosis[J]. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 2014, 7(1): a016659. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016659.
|
| [28] |
AKLILU B B, SODERQUIST R S, CULLIGAN K M. Genetic analysis of the replication protein A large subunit family in Arabidopsis reveals unique and overlapping roles in DNA repair, meiosis and DNA replication[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, 42(5): 3104-3118. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1292
|
| [29] |
ISHIBASHI T, KIMURA S, SAKAGUCHI K. A higher plant has three different types of RPA heterotrimeric complex[J]. The Journal of Biochemistry, 2006, 139(1): 99-104. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvj014
|
| [30] |
MIAO Y J, SHI W Q, WANG H J, et al. Replication protein A large subunit (RPA1a) limits chiasma formation during rice meiosis[J]. Plant Physiology, 2021, 187(3): 1605-1618. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab365
|
| [31] |
FERNANDES J B, DUHAMEL M, SEGUéLA -ARNAUD M, et al. FIGL1 and its novel partner FLIP form a conserved complex that regulates homologous recombination[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2018, 14(4): e1007317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007317.
|
| [32] |
DA INES O, ABE K, GOUBELY C, et al. Differing requirements for RAD51 and DMC1 in meiotic pairing of centromeres and chromosome arms in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2012, 8(4): e1002636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002636.
|
| [33] |
DA INES O, DEGROOTE F, GOUBELY C, et al. Meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis is catalysed by DMC1, with RAD51 playing a supporting role[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2013, 9(9): e1003787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003787.
|
| [34] |
CLOUD V, CHAN Y L, GRUBB J, et al. Rad51 is an accessory factor for Dmc1-mediated joint molecule formation during meiosis[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6099): 1222-1225. doi: 10.1126/science.1219379
|
| [35] |
SEELIGER K, DUKOWIC-SCHULZE S, WURZ-WILDERSINN R, et al. BRCA2 is a mediator of RAD51- and DMC1-facilitated homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. The New Phytologist, 2012, 193(2): 364-375. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03947.x
|
| [36] |
LIN Z, KONG H, NEI M, et al. Origins and evolution of the recA/RAD51 gene family: Evidence for ancient gene duplication and endosymbiotic gene transfer[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(27): 10328-10333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604232103
|
| [37] |
MERCIER R, MÉZARD C, JENCZEWSKI E, et al. The molecular biology of meiosis in plants[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2015, 66: 297-327. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035923
|
| [38] |
SU H, CHENG Z, HUANG J, et al. Arabidopsis RAD51, RAD51C and XRCC3 proteins form a complex and facilitate RAD51 localization on chromosomes for meiotic recombination[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2017, 13(5): e1006827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006827.
|
| [39] |
WANG Y, XIAO R, WANG H, et al. The Arabidopsis RAD51 paralogs RAD51B, RAD51D and XRCC2 play partially redundant roles in somatic DNA repair and gene regulation[J]. New Phytologist, 2014, 201(1): 292-304. doi: 10.1111/nph.12498
|
| [40] |
DA INES O, DEGROOTE F, AMIARD S, et al. Effects of XRCC2 and RAD51B mutations on somatic and meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. The Plant Journal, 2013, 74(6): 959-970. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12182
|
| [41] |
COLLINS I, NEWLON C S. Chromosomal DNA replication initiates at the same origins in meiosis and mitosis[J]. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1994, 14(5): 3524-3534.
|
| [42] |
SZOSTAK J W, ORR-WEAVER T L, ROTHSTEIN R J, et al. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination[J]. Cell, 1983, 33(1): 25-35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8
|
| [43] |
TERASAWA M, OGAWA H, TSUKAMOTO Y, et al. Meiotic recombination-related DNA synthesis and its implications for cross-over and non-cross-over recombinant formation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104(14): 5965-5970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611490104
|
| [44] |
LU P L, HAN X W, QI J, et al. Analysis of Arabidopsis genome-wide variations before and after meiosis and meiotic recombination by resequencing Landsberg erecta and all four products of a single meiosis[J]. Genome Research, 2012, 22(3): 508-518. doi: 10.1101/gr.127522.111
|
| [45] |
YANG H X, LU P L, WANG Y X, et al. The transcriptome landscape of Arabidopsis male meiocytes from high-throughput sequencing: The complexity and evolution of the meiotic process[J]. The Plant Journal, 2011, 65(4): 503-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04439.x
|
| [46] |
WANG Y X, CHENG Z H, HUANG J Y, et al. The DNA replication factor RFC1 is required for interference-sensitive meiotic crossovers in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2012, 8(11): e1003039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003039.
|
| [47] |
HUANG J Y, CHENG Z H, WANG C, et al. Formation of interference-sensitive meiotic cross-overs requires sufficient DNA leading-strand elongation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(40): 12534-12539. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507165112
|
| [48] |
HUANG J Y, COPENHAVER G P, MA H, et al. New insights into the role of DNA synthesis in meiotic recombination[J]. Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(16): 1260-1269. doi: 10.1007/s11434-016-1126-7
|
| [49] |
WANG C, HUANG J Y, ZHANG J, et al. The largest subunit of DNA polymerase delta is required for normal formation of meiotic type I crossovers[J]. Plant Physiology, 2019, 179(2): 446-459. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00861
|
| [50] |
MCVEY M, KHODAVERDIAN V Y, MEYER D, et al. Eukaryotic DNA polymerases in homologous recombination[J]. Annual Review of Genetics, 2016, 50: 393-421. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035243
|
| [51] |
MAGA G, STUCKI M, SPADARI S, et al. DNA polymerase switching: I: Replication factor C displaces DNA polymerase alpha prior to PCNA loading[J]. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2000, 295(4): 791-801. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3394
|
| [52] |
DE MAAGD R A, LOONEN A, CHOUAREF J, et al. CRISPR/Cas inactivation of RECQ4 increases homeologous crossovers in an interspecific tomato hybrid[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2020, 18(3): 805-813. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13248
|
| [53] |
MALOISEL L, BHARGAVA J, ROEDER G S. A role for DNA polymerase delta in gene conversion and crossing over during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Genetics, 2004, 167(3): 1133-1142. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.026260
|
| [54] |
BISHOP D K, ZICKLER D. Early decision: Meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis[J]. Cell, 2004, 117(1): 9-15. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00297-1
|
| [55] |
KURZBAUER M T, UANSCHOU C, CHEN D, et al. The recombinases DMC1 and RAD51 are functionally and spatially separated during meiosis in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2012, 24(5): 2058-2070. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.098459
|
| [56] |
REN L J, ZHAO T T, ZHAO Y Z, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase DESYNAPSIS1 regulates synapsis and recombination in rice meiosis[J]. Cell Reports, 2021, 37(5): 109941. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109941.
|
| [57] |
BENYAHYA F, NADAUD I, DA INES O, et al. SPO11.2 is essential for programmed double-strand break formation during meiosis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. )[J]. The Plant Journal, 2020, 104(1): 30-43. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14903
|
| [58] |
CRISMANI W, GIRARD C, FROGER N, et al. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers[J]. Science, 2012, 336(6088): 1588-1590. doi: 10.1126/science.1220381
|
| [59] |
GIRARD C, CRISMANI W, FROGER N, et al. FANCM-associated proteins MHF1 and MHF2, but not the other Fanconi anemia factors, limit meiotic crossovers[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, 42(14): 9087-9095. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku614
|
| [60] |
FERNANDES J B, SÉGUÉLA-ARNAUD M, LARCHEVÊQUE C, et al. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in hybrid plants[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(10): 2431-2436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713078114
|
| [61] |
MERCIER R, JOLIVET S, VEZON D, et al. Two meiotic crossover classes cohabit in Arabidopsis: One is dependent on MER3, whereas the other one is not[J]. Current Biology, 2005, 15(8): 692-701. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.056
|
| [62] |
LYNN A, SOUCEK R, BÖRNER G V. ZMM proteins during meiosis: Crossover artists at work[J]. Chromosome Research, 2007, 15(5): 591-605. doi: 10.1007/s10577-007-1150-1
|
| [63] |
MACAISNE N, VIGNARD J, MERCIER R. SHOC1 and PTD form an XPF-ERCC1-like complex that is required for formation of class I crossovers [J]. Journal of Cell Science, 2011, 124(Pt 16): 2687-91.
|
| [64] |
CHELYSHEVA L, VEZON D, CHAMBON A, et al. The Arabidopsis HEI10 is a new ZMM protein related to Zip3[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2012, 8(7): e1002799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002799.
|
| [65] |
CHELYSHEVA L, GENDROT G, VEZON D, et al. Zip4/Spo22 is required for class I CO formation but not for synapsis completion in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2007, 3(5): e83. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030083.
|
| [66] |
HIGGINS J D, ARMSTRONG S J H, FRANKLIN F C, et al. The Arabidopsis MutS homolog AtMSH4 functions at an early step in recombination: Evidence for two classes of recombination in Arabidopsis[J]. Genes & Development, 2004, 18(20): 2557-2570.
|
| [67] |
HIGGINS J D, VIGNARD J, MERCIER R, et al. AtMSH5 partners AtMSH4 in the class I meiotic crossover pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana, but is not required for synapsis[J]. The Plant Journal, 2008, 55(1): 28-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03470.x
|
| [68] |
MAZINA O M, MAZIN A V, NAKAGAWA T, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer3 helicase stimulates 3'-5' heteroduplex extension by Rad51: Implications for crossover control in meiotic recombination[J]. Cell, 2004, 117(1): 47-56. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00294-6
|
| [69] |
SNOWDEN T, ACHARYA S, BUTZ C, et al. hMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes holliday junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes[J]. Molecular Cell, 2004, 15(3): 437-451. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.040
|
| [70] |
DE MUYT A, PYATNITSKAYA A, ANDRÉANI J, et al. A meiotic XPF-ERCC1-like complex recognizes joint molecule recombination intermediates to promote crossover formation[J]. Genes & Development, 2018, 32(3/4): 283-296.
|
| [71] |
PYATNITSKAYA A, ANDREANI J, GUÉROIS R, et al. The Zip4 protein directly couples meiotic crossover formation to synaptonemal complex assembly[J]. Genes & Development, 2022, 36(1/2): 53-69.
|
| [72] |
REYNOLDS A, QIAO H Y, YANG Y, et al. RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis[J]. Nature Genetics, 2013, 45(3): 269-278. doi: 10.1038/ng.2541
|
| [73] |
TOBY G G, GHERRABY W, COLEMAN T R, et al. A novel RING finger protein, human enhancer of invasion 10, alters mitotic progression through regulation of cyclin B levels[J]. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2003, 23(6): 2109-2122. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.6.2109-2122.2003
|
| [74] |
ZIOLKOWSKI P A, UNDERWOOD C J, LAMBING C, et al. Natural variation and dosage of the HEI10 meiotic E3 ligase control Arabidopsis crossover recombination[J]. Genes & Development, 2017, 31(3): 306-317.
|
| [75] |
MORGAN C, FOZARD J A, HARTLEY M, et al. Diffusion-mediated HEI10 coarsening can explain meiotic crossover positioning in Arabidopsis[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 4674. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24827-w.
|
| [76] |
KURZBAUER M T, PRADILLO M, KERZENDORFER C, et al. Arabidopsis thaliana FANCD2 promotes meiotic crossover formation[J]. The Plant Cell, 2018, 30(2): 415-428. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00745
|
| [77] |
MORGAN T H. Heredity and sex[Z] //Columbia University Lectures. The jessup lectures, New York: Columbia University Press, 1913.
|
| [78] |
CAPILLA-PÉREZ L, DURAND S, HUREL A, et al. The synaptonemal complex imposes crossover interference and heterochiasmy in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(12): e2023613118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023613118.
|
| [79] |
NONOMURA K I, NAKANO M, MURATA K, et al. An insertional mutation in the rice PAIR2 gene, the ortholog of Arabidopsis ASY1, results in a defect in homologous chromosome pairing during meiosis[J]. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2004, 271(2): 121-129. doi: 10.1007/s00438-003-0934-z
|
| [80] |
YUAN W Y, LI X W, CHANG Y X, et al. Mutation of the rice gene PAIR3 results in lack of bivalent formation in meiosis[J]. The Plant Journal, 2009, 59(2): 303-315. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03870.x
|
| [81] |
FRANCE M G, ENDERLE J, RÖHRIG S, et al. ZYP1 is required for obligate cross-over formation and cross-over interference in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(14): e2021671118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021671118.
|
| [82] |
POCHON G, HENRY I M, YANG C, et al. The Arabidopsis Hop1 homolog ASY1 mediates cross-over assurance and interference[EB/OL]. BioRxiv, 2022: 46164616 (2022-03-17) [2022-08-20]. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.17.484635.
|
| [83] |
DURAND S, LIAN Q, JING J, et al. Dual control of meiotic crossover patterning[EB/OL]. BioRxiv, 2022: 491364 (2022-05-11) [2022-08-20]. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.11.491364.
|
| [84] |
ROG O, KÖHLER S, DERNBURG A F. The synaptonemal complex has liquid crystalline properties and spatially regulates meiotic recombination factors[J]. eLife, 2017, 6: e21455. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21455.
|
| [85] |
ZHANG L Y, STAUFFER W, ZWICKER D, et al. Crossover patterning through kinase-regulated condensation and coarsening of recombination nodules[EB/OL]. BioRxiv, 2021: 457865 (2021-08-26) [2022-08-20]. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.26.457865.
|
| [86] |
MAYER K F X, WAUGH R, LANGRIDGE P, et al. A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome[J]. Nature, 2012, 491(7426): 711-716. doi: 10.1038/nature11543
|
| [87] |
APPELS R, EVERSOLE K, STEIN N, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome[J]. Science, 2018, 361(6403): eaar7191. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7191.
|
| [88] |
LI X, LI L, YAN J B. Dissecting meiotic recombination based on tetrad analysis by single-microspore sequencing in maize[J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 6648. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7648.
|
| [89] |
CONSORTIUM T G. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution[J]. Nature, 2012, 485(7400): 635-641. doi: 10.1038/nature11119
|
| [90] |
MCCONAUGHY S J. Recombination hotspots in soybean [Glycine max (L. ) Merr. ], in Agronomy and Horticulture Department[D]. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 2022.
|
| [91] |
SCHMUTZ J, CANNON S B, SCHLUETER J, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean[J]. Nature, 2010, 463(7278): 178-183. doi: 10.1038/nature08670
|
| [92] |
BLARY A, JENCZEWSKI E. Manipulation of crossover frequency and distribution for plant breeding[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2019, 132(3): 575-592. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3240-1
|
| [93] |
HSU Y M, FALQUE M, MARTIN O C. Quantitative modelling of fine-scale variations in the Arabidopsis thaliana crossover landscape[J]. Quantitative Plant Biology, 2022, 3: e3. doi: 10.1017/qpb.2021.17.
|
| [94] |
PRATTO F, BRICK K, CHENG G, et al. Meiotic recombination mirrors patterns of germline replication in mice and humans[J]. Cell, 2021, 184(16): 4251-4267. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.025
|
| [95] |
UNDERWOOD C J, CHOI K, LAMBING C, et al. Epigenetic activation of meiotic recombination near Arabidopsis thaliana centromeres via loss of H3K9me2 and non-CG DNA methylation[J]. Genome Research, 2018, 28(4): 519-531. doi: 10.1101/gr.227116.117
|
| [96] |
CHOI K, ZHAO X H, TOCK A J, et al. Nucleosomes and DNA methylation shape meiotic DSB frequency in Arabidopsis thaliana transposons and gene regulatory regions[J]. Genome Research, 2018, 28(4): 532-546. doi: 10.1101/gr.225599.117
|
| [97] |
LIAN Q C, SOLIER V, WALKEMEIER B, et al. The megabase-scale crossover landscape is largely independent of sequence divergence[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 3828. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31509-8.
|
| [98] |
YELINA N E, LAMBING C, HARDCASTLE T J, et al. DNA methylation epigenetically silences crossover hot spots and controls chromosomal domains of meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis[J]. Genes & Development, 2015, 29(20): 2183-2202.
|
| [99] |
CHOI K, ZHAO X, KELLY K A, et al. Arabidopsis meiotic crossover hot spots overlap with H2A. Z nucleosomes at gene promoters[J]. Nature Genetics, 2013, 45(11): 1327-1336. doi: 10.1038/ng.2766
|
| [100] |
MARAND A P, JANSKY S H, ZHAO H N, et al. Meiotic crossovers are associated with open chromatin and enriched with Stowaway transposons in potato[J]. Genome Biology, 2017, 18: 203. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1326-8.
|
| [101] |
KIANIAN P M A, WANG M, SIMONS K, et al. Highresolution crossover mapping reveals similarities and differences of male and female recombination in maize[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 2370. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04562-5.
|
| [102] |
TOCK A J, HOLLAND D M, JIANG W, et al. Crossover-active regions of the wheat genome are distinguished by DMC1, the chromosome axis, H3K27me3, and signatures of adaptation[J]. Genome Research, 2021, 31(9): 1614-1628. doi: 10.1101/gr.273672.120
|
| [103] |
YELINA N E, CHOI K, CHELYSHEVA L, et al. Epigenetic remodeling of meiotic crossover frequency in Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methyltransferase mutants[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2012, 8(8): e1002844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002844.
|
| [104] |
PONT C, LEROY T, SEIDEL M, et al. Tracing the ancestry of modern bread wheats[J]. Nature Genetics, 2019, 51(5): 905-911. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0393-z
|
| [105] |
ROWAN B A, HEAVENS D, FEUERBORN T R, et al. An ultra high-density Arabidopsis thaliana crossover map that refines the influences of structural variation and epigenetic features[J]. Genetics, 2019, 213(3): 771-787. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302406
|
| [106] |
MARTÍN A C, SHAW P, PHILLIPS D, et al. Licensing MLH1 sites for crossover during meiosis[J]. Nature Communications, 2014, 5: 4580. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5580.
|
| [107] |
TAM S M, HAYS J B, CHETELAT R T. Effects of suppressing the DNA mismatch repair system on homeologous recombination in tomato[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 123(8): 1445-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1679-4
|
| [108] |
ZHANG L, PICKERING R, MURRAY B. Direct measurement of recombination frequency in interspecific hybrids between Hordeum vulgare and H. bulbosum using genomic in situ hybridization [J]. Heredity, 1999, 83 ( Pt 3): 304-309.
|
| [109] |
BLACKWELL A R, DLUZEWSKA J, SZYMANSKA-LEJMAN M, et al. MSH2 shapes the meiotic crossover landscape in relation to interhomolog polymorphism in Arabidopsis[J]. The EMBO Journal, 2020, 39(21): e104858. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020104858.
|
| [110] |
GOODWILLIE C, KALISZ S, ECKERT C G, The evolutionary Enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence [J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2005, 36(1): 47-79.
|
| [111] |
MONNAHAN P, KOLÁŘ F, BADUEL P, et al. Pervasive population genomic consequences of genome duplication in Arabidopsis arenosa[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 3(3): 457-468.
|
| [112] |
BAUDAT F, BUARD J, GREY C, et al. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5967): 836-840. doi: 10.1126/science.1183439
|
| [113] |
SMAGULOVA F, GREGORETTI I V, BRICK K, et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots[J]. Nature, 2011, 472(7343): 375-378. doi: 10.1038/nature09869
|
| [114] |
SHILO S, MELAMED-BESSUDO C, DORONE Y, et al. DNA crossover motifs associated with epigenetic modifications delineate open chromatin regions in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2015, 27(9): 2427-2436. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00391
|
| [115] |
LIU S Z, YEH C T, JI T M, et al. Mu transposon insertion sites and meiotic recombination events co-localize with epigenetic marks for open chromatin across the maize genome[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2009, 5(11): e1000733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000733.
|
| [116] |
SAINTENAC C, FAURE S, REMAY A, et al. Variation in crossover rates across a 3-Mb contig of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) reveals the presence of a meiotic recombination hotspot[J]. Chromosoma, 2011, 120(2): 185-198. doi: 10.1007/s00412-010-0302-9
|
| [117] |
DEMIRCI S, VAN DIJK A D J, SANCHEZ PEREZ G, et al. Distribution, position and genomic characteristics of crossovers in tomato recombinant inbred lines derived from an interspecific cross between Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum pimpinellifolium[J]. The Plant Journal, 2017, 89(3): 554-564. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13406
|
| [118] |
HENDERSON I R. Control of meiotic recombination frequency in plant genomes[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2012, 15(5): 556-561. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.09.002
|
| [119] |
KUO P, DA INES O, LAMBING C. Rewiring meiosis for crop improvement[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 708948. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.708948.
|
| [120] |
UNDERWOOD C J, MERCIER R. Engineering apomixis: Clonal seeds approaching the fields[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2022, 73: 201-225. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-102720-013958
|
| [121] |
BERCHOWITZ L E, FRANCIS K E, BEY A L, et al. The role of AtMUS81 in interference-insensitive crossovers in A. thaliana[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2007, 3(8): e132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030132.
|
| [122] |
HARTUNG F, SUER S, PUCHTA H. Two closely related RecQ helicases have antagonistic roles in homologous recombination and DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104(47): 18836-18841. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705998104
|
| [123] |
SÉGUÉLA-ARNAUD M, CHOINARD S, LARCHEVÊQUE C, et al. RMI1 and TOP3α limit meiotic CO formation through their C-terminal domains[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, 45(4): 1860-1871.
|
| [124] |
SÉGUÉLA-ARNAUD M, CRISMANI W, LARCHEVÊQUE C, et al. Multiple mechanisms limit meiotic crossovers: TOP3α and two BLM homologs antagonize crossovers in parallel to FANCM[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(15): 4713-4718. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423107112
|
| [125] |
GIRARD C, CHELYSHEVA L, CHOINARD S, et al. Correction: AAA-ATPase FIDGETIN-LIKE 1 and helicase FANCM antagonize meiotic crossovers by distinct mechanisms[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2015, 11(9): e1005448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005448.
|
| [126] |
BLARY A, GONZALO A, EBER F, et al. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers in Brassica crops[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 368. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00368.
|
| [127] |
DESJARDINS S D, SIMMONDS J, GUTERMAN I, et al. FANCM promotes class I interfering crossovers and suppresses class II non-interfering crossovers in wheat meiosis[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 3644. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31438-6.
|
| [128] |
MIEULET D, AUBERT G, BRES C, et al. Unleashing meiotic crossovers in crops[J]. Nature Plants, 2018, 4(12): 1010-1016. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0311-x
|
| [129] |
RAZ A, DAHAN-MEIR T, MELAMED-BESSUDO C, et al. Redistribution of meiotic crossovers along wheat chromosomes by virus-induced gene silencing[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 11: 635139. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.635139.
|
| [130] |
LI X, YU M S, BOLAÑOS-VILLEGAS P, et al. Fanconi anemia ortholog FANCM regulates meiotic crossover distribution in plants[J]. Plant Physiology, 2021, 186(1): 344-360. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab061
|
| [131] |
ARRIETA M, MACAULAY M, COLAS I, et al. An induced mutation in HvRECQL4 increases the overall recombination and restores fertility in a barley HvMLH3 mutant background[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 706560. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.706560.
|
| [132] |
DE MUYT A, ZHANG L R, PIOLOT T, et al. E3 ligase Hei10: A multifaceted structure-based signaling molecule with roles within and beyond meiosis[J]. Genes & Development, 2014, 28(10): 1111-1123.
|
| [133] |
SERRA H, LAMBING C, GRIFFIN C H, et al. Massive crossover elevation via combination of HEI10 and recq4a recq4b during Arabidopsis meiosis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(10): 2437-2442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713071115
|
| [134] |
TAAGEN E, BOGDANOVE A J, SORRELLS M E. Counting on crossovers: Controlled recombination for plant breeding[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2020, 25(5): 455-465. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.017
|
| [135] |
MELAMED-BESSUDO C, LEVY A A. Deficiency in DNA methylation increases meiotic crossover rates in euchromatic but not in heterochromatic regions in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(16): E981-E988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120742109.
|
| [136] |
LIU C L, CAO Y W, HUA Y F, et al. Concurrent disruption of genetic interference and increase of genetic recombination frequency in hybrid rice using CRISPR/Cas9[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 757152. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.757152.
|
| [137] |
WANG K J, WANG C, LIU Q, et al. Increasing the genetic recombination frequency by partial loss of function of the synaptonemal complex in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2015, 8(8): 1295-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.011
|
| [138] |
NAGESWARAN D C, KIM J, LAMBING C, et al. HIGH CROSSOVER RATE1 encodes PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE X1 and restricts meiotic crossovers in Arabidopsis[J]. Nature Plants, 2021, 7(4): 452-467. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00889-y
|
| [139] |
HOCHHOLDINGER F, BALDAUF J A. Heterosis in plants[J]. Current Biology, 2018, 28(18): R1089-R1092. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.041
|
| [140] |
SPILLANE C, CURTIS M D, GROSSNIKLAUS U. Apomixis technology development: Virgin births in farmers’ fields?[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2004, 22(6): 687-691. doi: 10.1038/nbt976
|
| [141] |
WANG C, LIU Q, SHEN Y, et al. Clonal seeds from hybrid rice by simultaneous genome engineering of meiosis and fertilization genes[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(3): 283-286. doi: 10.1038/s41587-018-0003-0
|
| [142] |
MARIMUTHU M P A, JOLIVET S, RAVI M, et al. Synthetic clonal reproduction through seeds[J]. Science, 2011, 331(6019): 876. doi: 10.1126/science.1199682.
|
| [143] |
D'ERFURTH I, JOLIVET S, FROGER N, et al. Turning meiosis into mitosis[J]. PLoS Biology, 2009, 7(6): e1000124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000124.
|
| [144] |
MIEULET D, JOLIVET S, RIVARD M, et al. Turning rice meiosis into mitosis[J]. Cell Research, 2016, 26(11): 1242-1254. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.117
|
| [145] |
CROMER L, HEYMAN J, TOUATI S, et al. OSD1 promotes meiotic progression via APC/C inhibition and forms a regulatory network with TDM and CYCA1;2/TAM[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2012, 8(7): e1002865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002865.
|
| [146] |
RAVI M, MARIMUTHU M P A, SIDDIQI I. Gamete formation without meiosis in Arabidopsis[J]. Nature, 2008, 451(7182): 1121-1124.
|
| [147] |
HSU P D, LANDER E S, ZHANG F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering[J]. Cell, 2014, 157(6): 1262-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010
|
| [148] |
RÖNSPIES M, DORN A, SCHINDELE P, et al. CRISPR-Cas-mediated chromosome engineering for crop improvement and synthetic biology[J]. Nature Plants, 2021, 7(5): 566-573. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00910-4
|
| [149] |
SARNO R, VICQ Y, UEMATSU N, et al. Programming sites of meiotic crossovers using Spo11 fusion proteins[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, 45(19): e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx739.
|
| [150] |
YELINA N E, HOLLAND D, GONZALEZ-JORGE S, et al. Coexpression of MEIOTIC-TOPOISOMERASE VIB-dCas9 with guide RNAs specific to a recombination hotspot is insufficient to increase crossover frequency in Arabidopsis[J]. G3 (Genes Genomes Genetics), 2022, 12(7): jkac105. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac105.
|
| [151] |
MANCERA E, BOURGON R, BROZZI A, et al. High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast[J]. Nature, 2008, 454(7203): 479-485. doi: 10.1038/nature07135
|
| [152] |
WANG Y Z, VAN RENGS W M J, ZAIDAN M W A M, et al. Meiosis in crops: From genes to genomes[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72(18): 6091-6109. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab217
|
| [153] |
FILLER HAYUT S, MELAMED BESSUDO C, LEVY A A. Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8: 15605. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15605.
|
| [154] |
KOURANOV A, ARMSTRONG C, SHRAWAT A, et al. Demonstration of targeted crossovers in hybrid maize using CRISPR technology[J]. Communications Biology, 2022, 5(1): 53. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03004-9.
|
| [155] |
BEYING N, SCHMIDT C, PACHER M, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated induction of heritable chromosomal translocations in Arabidopsis[J]. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(6): 638-645. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0663-x
|
| [156] |
SCHMIDT C, FRANSZ P, RÖNSPIES M, et al. Changing local recombination patterns in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/Cas mediated chromosome engineering[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 4418. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18277-z.
|
| [157] |
SCHWARTZ C, LENDERTS B, FEIGENBUTZ L, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated 75.5-Mb inversion in maize[J]. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(12): 1427-1431. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00817-6
|
| [158] |
GALLEGO-BARTOLOMÉ J, GARDINER J, LIU W L, et al. Targeted DNA demethylation of the Arabidopsis genome using the human TET1 catalytic domain[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(9): E2125-E2134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716945115.
|
| [159] |
GALLEGO-BARTOLOMÉ J, LIU W L, KUO P H, et al. Co-targeting RNA polymerases IV and V promotes efficient de novo DNA methylation in Arabidopsis[J]. Cell, 2019, 176(5): 1068-1082.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.029
|
| [160] |
DIRKS R, VAN DUN K, DE SNOO C B, et al. Reverse breeding: A novel breeding approach based on engineered meiosis[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2009, 7(9): 837-845. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00450.x
|
| [161] |
WIJNKER E, DEURHOF L, VAN DE BELT J, et al. Hybrid recreation by reverse breeding in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Nature Protocols, 2014, 9(4): 761-772. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.049
|
| [162] |
WIJNKER E, VAN DUN K, DE SNOO C B, et al. Reverse breeding in Arabidopsis thaliana generates homozygous parental lines from a heterozygous plant[J]. Nature Genetics, 2012, 44(4): 467-470. doi: 10.1038/ng.2203
|
| [163] |
CALVO‐BALTANÁS V, WIJNEN C L, YANG C, et al. Meiotic crossover reduction by virus‐induced gene silencing enables the efficient generation of chromosome substitution lines and reverse breeding in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. The Plant Journal, 2020, 104(5): 1437-1452. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14990
|
| 1. |
高旻. 视频分析技术在港口交通流量监控中的应用. 电视技术. 2025(01): 223-225 .
| |
| 2. |
陈钇果. 基于FPGA架构的人工智能加速器设计与实现. 软件. 2025(01): 59-61 .
| |
| 3. |
沃英达. 基于深度学习算法的激光散斑音频信号提取与增强. 电声技术. 2025(02): 52-54+77 .
| |
| 4. |
蓝壮青. 基于欠定盲源分离的双路音频信号噪声自适应分离. 现代电子技术. 2024(24): 68-72 .
| |
| 5. |
吴源源. 基于机器学习的音频信号处理系统设计. 电声技术. 2024(11): 182-184 .
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: