Effects of biomass types and additions on soil infiltration characteristics and nutrient transport in fertilizer irrigation

ZHOU Yingjie; LIU Yanwei; HUANG Yifeng; LIU Xiaogang

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202208007

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2023 > 44(4): 585-592. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202208007

ZHOU Yingjie, LIU Yanwei, HUANG Yifeng, et al. Effects of biomass types and additions on soil infiltration characteristics and nutrient transport in fertilizer irrigation[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2023, 44(4): 585-592. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202208007

Citation:

PDF (1219 KB)

Effects of biomass types and additions on soil infiltration characteristics and nutrient transport in fertilizer irrigation

1.
College of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
2.
Guangxi Liugong Machinery Co., Ltd., Liuzhou 545007, China

More Information

Received Date: August 02, 2022
Available Online: September 03, 2023
Published Date: May 24, 2023

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
In order to explore the effects of different biomass additions and amounts on soil infiltration characteristics and nutrient transport in fertilizer irrigation, so as to provide a theoretical basis for improving fertilizer irrigation efficiency.
Method
Biochar (BC), coffee grounds (CF) and bagasse (SC) were used as biomass additives, and four levels of addition were set including T₁ (0.5%), T₂ (1.0%), T₃ (1.5%), and T₄ (2.0%). The transport characteristics of fertilizer solution in different biomass-added soils and their nutrient distributions were measured. The effects of different biomass additions on soil structure were evaluated.
Result
The inhibitory effects of three kinds of biomass on wetting front migration and soil cumulative infiltration were SC>CF>BC, and the inhibitory effects in each treatment group increased with increasing biomass addition. Compared with the CK group, the wetting front migration distances of SCT₄, CFT₄ and BCT₄ decreased by 38.33%, 37.00% and 34.00% respectively. The cumulative soil infiltration amounts of SCT₄, CFT₄ and BCT₄ decreased by 31.01%, 30.00% and 26.60% respectively. Compared with the CK group, the three kinds of biomass additions under the fertilizer irrigation improved the contents of three main inorganic nutrients in soil, and the soil fertility was improved with increasing biomass addition. The overall performance of soil nitrate nitrogen retention by the three kinds of biomass was BC>CF>SC. Among them, the soil nitrate nitrogen contents of BCT₄, CFT₄ and SCT₄ increased by 74.32%, 56.00% and 51.00% respectively. The overall performance of soil available phosphorus retention by the three kinds of biomass was CF>SC>BC. Among them, the soil available phosphorus contents of CFT₄, SCT₄ and BCT₄ increased by 140.70%, 139.20% and 30.25% respectively. The overall performance of soil available potassium retention by the three kinds of biomass was CF>BC>SC. Among them, CFT₄, BCT₄ and SCT₄ increased the soil available potassium contents by 143.87%, 126.85% and 104.03% respectively.
Conclusion
All three kinds of biomass have inhibitory effects on the infiltration of fertilizer solution with biochar being the best. The three kinds of biomass all have interception effects on fertility, meanwhile, biochar has the best interception effect on nitrate nitrogen, and coffee grounds have the best interception effect on available phosphorus and available potassium.
- Biomass,
- Fertilizer irrigation,
- Water and fertilizer,
- Soil infiltration characteristic,
- Nutrient transport

FullText(HTML)

References (30)

References

[1]	李冬初, 黄晶, 马常宝, 等. 中国农耕区土壤有机质含量及其与酸碱度和容重关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6): 252-258.
[2]	刘振杰, 李鹏飞, 黄世威, 等. 小麦秸秆生物质炭施用对不同耕作措施土壤碳含量变化的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(6): 3000-3009.
[3]	王艳群, 彭正萍, 薛世川, 等. 过量施肥对设施农田土壤生态环境的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2005, 24(S1): 81-84.
[4]	ZHU X, CHEN B, ZHU L, et al. Effects and mechanisms of biochar-microbe interactions in soil improvement and pollution remediation: A review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 227: 98-115. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.032
[5]	LEHMANN J, GAUNT J, RONDON M. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: A review[J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2006, 11(2): 395-419.
[6]	刘书田, 窦森, 郑伟, 等. 基于配方施肥数据集的有机碳含量与温度和降水量相关性研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(7): 1413-1420.
[7]	魏阳, 彭勃, 汪元南, 等. 利用复合菌系处理甘蔗渣及城市污泥堆肥效果[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(7): 316-320.
[8]	田丹, 屈忠义, 李波, 等. 生物炭对砂土水力特征参数及持水特性影响试验研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2013, 32(3): 135-137.
[9]	廉辰, 于嘉佳, 高婷, 等. 3种壳类生物质炭对南方红壤理化性质的动态影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2022, 43(1): 20-27.
[10]	周建民, 沈仁芳. 土壤学大辞典[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
[11]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1981.
[12]	范严伟, 赵文举, 冀宏. 膜孔灌溉单孔入渗Kostiakov模型建立与验证[J]. 兰州理工大学学报, 2012, 38(3): 61-66.
[13]	PHILIP J R. The theory of infiltration: 1: The infiltration equation and its solution[J]. Soil Science, 1957, 83(5): 345-358. doi: 10.1097/00010694-195705000-00002
[14]	刘春成, 李毅, 任鑫, 等. 四种入渗模型对斥水土壤入渗规律的适用性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(5): 62-67.
[15]	SONE J S, OLIVEIRA P T S, EUCLIDES V P B, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilisation and stocking rates on soil erosion and water infiltration in a Brazilian Cerrado farm[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 304: 107159.
[16]	XIAO Y, HUANG Z, YANG F, et al. Dynamics of soil moisture and salt content after infiltration of saline ice meltwater in saline-sodic soil columns[J]. Pedosphere, 2017, 27(6): 1116-1124. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60465-X
[17]	ALAOUL A. Modelling susceptibility of grassland soil to macropore flow[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 525: 536-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.016
[18]	包维斌, 白一茹, 赵云鹏, 等. 生物炭添加对宁夏中部旱区土壤水分入渗及持水性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(6): 1326-1332.
[19]	HUSSAIN R, KUMAR GHOSH K, RAVI K. Impact of biochar produced from hardwood of mesquite on the hydraulic and physical properties of compacted soils for potential application in engineered structures[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 385: 114836. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114836
[20]	LIM T J, SPOKAS K A, FEYEREISEN G, et al. Predicting the impact of biochar additions on soil hydraulic properties[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 142: 136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.069
[21]	JEFFERY S, MEINDERS M B J, STOOF C R, et al. Biochar application does not improve the soil hydrological function of a sandy soil[J]. Geoderma, 2015, 251-252: 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.03.022
[22]	李帅霖, 王霞, 王朔, 等. 生物炭施用方式及用量对土壤水分入渗与蒸发的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(14): 135-144.
[23]	LIANG B Q, LEHMANN J, SOHI S P, et al. Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2010, 41(2): 206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.09.007
[24]	PUGET P, CHENU C, BALESDENT J. Dynamics of soil organic matter associated with particle size fractions of water-stable aggregates[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2000, 51(4): 595-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2000.00353.x
[25]	管瑶, 雷廷武, 刘芳芳, 等. 土壤点源入渗自动测量系统监测滴头下土壤湿润过程[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(14): 1-7.
[26]	刘目兴, 聂艳, 于婧. 不同初始含水率下粘质土壤的入渗过程[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3): 871-878.
[27]	LEHMANN J. Bio-energy in the black[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2007, 5(7): 381-387. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[381:BITB]2.0.CO;2
[28]	CRUZ R, MENDES E, TORRINHA Á, et al. Revalorization of spent coffee residues by a direct agronomic approach[J]. Food Research International, 2015, 73: 190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.018
[29]	黄绍文, 金继运. 土壤钾形态及其植物有效性研究进展[J]. 土壤肥料, 1995(5): 23-29.
[30]	王亚琼, 牛文全, 段晓辉, 等. 生物炭对关中塿土不同形态钾素含量的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2021, 46(2): 43-46.

Cited By

LIU Xiaogang

1.
College of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (135) PDF downloads (15)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of biomass types and additions on soil infiltration characteristics and nutrient transport in fertilizer irrigation

Abstract

References

Catalog

LIU Xiaogang

Export File

Citation

Format

Content