Citation: | WANG Ting, WANG Wei, XU Huan, et al. Effects of duck Tembutsu virus E protein and its domains of I, II, III on DEF cell cycle and apoptosis[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2023, 44(2): 205-211. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202204018 |
To investigate the effects of the whole length of Duck Tambusu virus (DTMUV) E protein and its domains of I, II and III (DI, DII and DIII) on the cell cycle and apoptosis of duck embryo fibroblast (DEF) cells.
The full-length of DTMUV E protein, DI, DII and DIII eukaryotic expression plasmids were designed and synthesized, and transfected into DEF. The changes of DEF apoptosis and cell cycle caused by different proteins were detected by flow cytometry.
The results of apoptosis showed that after 24 h of plasmid transfection, the apoptosis rates of DEF induced by the full length, DI, DII and DIII were 16.4%, 15.1%, 14.0% and 17.2% respectively; after 36 h of plasmid transfection, the apoptosis rates of DEF induced by E protein full length, DI, DII and DIII were 23.4%, 18.5%, 26.7% and 29.4%. The results of cell cycle detection showed that the percentage of DNA synthesis phase (S-phase) cells transfected with E protein full length, DI, DII and DIII plasmid was obviously higher than those of cells transfected with pEGFP-N1 empty vector 24 h and 36 h later. After 24 h of plasmid transfection, the percentage of S-phase cells in E protein, DI, DII and DIII groups were 5.43%, 22.58%, 12.75% and 12.80%, respectively; After 36 h of plasmid transfection, the percentage of S-phase cells in E protein, DI, DII and DIII groups were 9.98%, 11.44%, 10.44% and 11.00%, respectively.
The full length of DTMUV E protein and its three domains can induce early cell apoptosis and arrest the S-phase cells, but the ability of each protein fragment to induce cell apoptosis and change the cell cycle is different.
[1] |
张帆帆, 曾艳兵, 方绍培, 等. 鸭坦布苏病毒病的研究进展[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2021, 52(6): 1489-1497.
|
[2] |
陈仕龙, 陈少莺, 王劭, 等. 一种引起蛋鸡产蛋下降的新型黄病毒的分离与初步鉴定[J]. 福建农业学报, 2011, 26(2): 170-174.
|
[3] |
章丽娇. 坦布苏病毒细胞适应毒免疫原性及致弱分子基础研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2017.
|
[4] |
姜胜男. 鸭DDX3X基因的克隆表达及其抗鸭坦布苏病毒活性研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020.
|
[5] |
董嘉文, 李林林, 孙敏华, 等. 鸭坦布苏病毒JM株E蛋白的截断表达及间接ELISA方法的建立[J]. 中国动物传染病学报, 2017, 25(1): 12-18.
|
[6] |
LIU M, LIU C, LI G, et al. Complete genomic sequence of duck flavivirus from China[J]. Journal of Virology, 2012, 86(6): 3398-3399. doi: 10.1128/JVI.07086-11
|
[7] |
YU K, SHENG Z Z, HUANG B, et al. Structural, antigenic, and evolutionary characterizations of the envelope protein of newly emerging Duck Tembusu Virus[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(8): e71319.
|
[8] |
ZHANG X, JIA R, SHEN H, et al. Structures and functions of the envelope glycoprotein in flavivirus infections[J]. Viruses, 2017, 9(11): 338. doi: 10.3390/v9110338.
|
[9] |
ZHAO D, HUANG X, LIU Y, et al. Domain I and II from newly emerging goose tembusu virus envelope protein functions as a dominant-negative inhibitor of virus infectivity[J]. Research in Veterinary Science, 2015, 98: 121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.11.003
|
[10] |
王若洁. 鸭坦布苏病毒E蛋白Domain III的原核表达及其免疫原性的初步研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2020.
|
[11] |
张琳. 鸭坦布苏病毒E蛋白抗原表位的鉴定[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2013.
|
[12] |
KOLASKAR A S, KULKARNI-KALE U. Prediction of three-dimensional structure and mapping of conformational epitopes of envelope glycoprotein of Japanese encephalitis virus[J]. Virology, 1999, 261(1): 31-42. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9859
|
[13] |
李秀丽, 提金凤, 路云建, 等. 鸭坦布苏病毒对雏鸭免疫系统的影响[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2017, 37(2): 211-217.
|
[14] |
提金凤, 李志杰, 刁有祥, 等. 坦布苏病毒诱导昆明鼠脾细胞凋亡[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2021, 41(4): 640-645.
|
[15] |
PAN Y, CHENG A, ZHANG X, et al. Transcriptome analysis of duck embryo fibroblasts for the dynamic response to duck tembusu virus infection and dual regulation of apoptosis genes[J]. Aging, 2020, 12(17): 17503-17527.
|
[16] |
于观留. 坦布苏病毒感染对鸭胚成纤维细胞生物学功能的影响及其机制研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019.
|
[17] |
林昀. 坦布苏病毒感染的鸭胚成纤维中长链非编码RNA的表达谱变化及其功能初步研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2020.
|
[18] |
林委卫, 陈雪明, 李晨曦, 等. 鸭坦布苏病毒E蛋白具有独特交叉反应性中和表位的鉴定[J]. 中国兽医学报, 2021, 41(1): 26-32.
|