Feeding preference and growth adaptability of <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i> on different sugarcane varieties and <i>Rottboellia cochinchinensis</i>

HUANG Qian; QIN Jiangmei; HUANG Xiaofeng; ZHONG Yong; LI Cheng; WU Biqiu; HUANG Suosheng; HUANG Fengkuan; LING Yan; LONG Liping

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202201016

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2022 > 43(5): 29-34. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202201016

HUANG Qian, QIN Jiangmei, HUANG Xiaofeng, et al. Feeding preference and growth adaptability of Spodoptera frugiperda on different sugarcane varieties and Rottboellia cochinchinensis[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2022, 43(5): 29-34. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202201016

Citation:

PDF (871 KB)

Feeding preference and growth adaptability of Spodoptera frugiperda on different sugarcane varieties and Rottboellia cochinchinensis

1.
Plant Protection Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Guangxi Key Laboratory for Biology of Crop Diseases and Insect Pests, Nanning 530007, China
2.
Baise Modern Agricultural Technology Research and Extension Center in Guangxi, Baise 533612, China

More Information

Received Date: January 11, 2022
Available Online: May 17, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To clarify the feeding preference and growth adaptability of Spodoptera frugiperda on sugarcane and Rottboellia cochinchinensis.

Method
Two sugarcane varieties (‘Guitang 42’ and ‘Taitang 22’) , two fruit cane varieties (‘Guiguozhe 1’ and ‘Yellow skin sugarcane’) , and a common weed of R. cochinchinensis in sugarcane field were selected as the research objects. Through the feeding preference experiment and constructing the life table of the experimental population, the feeding preference and growth adaptability of S. frugiperda on sugarcane and R. cochinchinensis were studied.

Result
The larvae of different instars of S. frugiperda preferred to feed on fruit sugarcane when choosing between sugarcane and fruit sugarcane, and the feeding selection rate on ‘Guiguozhe 1’ was most significantly higher than those of other tested varieties. The larvae of S. frugiperda had a significant feeding tendency to R. cochinchinensis when choosing between ‘Guiguozhe 1’ and R. cochinchinensi. The larval survival rate of S. frugiperda on R. cochinchinensiswas the highest, which was 66%, followed by 12% on ‘Guiguozhe 1’. On other sugarcane varieties, S. frugiperda had died in the period of low instar. The life cycle of S. frugiperda could be completed on R. cochinchinensis, and the intrinsic rate of increase (r_m) and finite rate of increase (λ) were 1.16 and 1.52, respectively.

Conclusion
Compared with sugarcane, S. frugiperda preferes to feed on R. cochinchinensis and has higher adaptability.
- Spodoptera frugiperda,
- Sugarcane,
- Rottboellia cochinchinensis,
- Feeding preference,
- Adaptability

FullText(HTML)

References (19)

References

[1]	陈辉, 杨学礼, 谌爱东, 等. 我国最早发现为害地草地贪夜蛾的入侵时间及其虫源分布[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2020, 57(6): 1270-1278.
[2]	张磊, 柳贝, 姜玉英, 等. 中国不同地区草地贪夜蛾种群生物型分子特征分析[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(4): 20-27.
[3]	赵金凤, 郑宇, 邱良妙, 等. 福建省草地贪夜蛾越冬种群生物型鉴定与分析[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2020, 57(6): 1326-1332.
[4]	梁沛, 谷少华, 张雷, 等. 我国草地贪夜蛾的生物学、生态学和防治研究概况与展望[J]. 昆虫学报, 2020, 63(5): 624-638.
[5]	唐运林, 顾偌铖, 吴燕燕, 等. 入侵重庆地区的草地贪夜蛾种群生物型鉴定[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(7): 1-7.
[6]	CHORMULE A, SHEJAWAL N, DESHMUKH S, et al. First report of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) on sugarcane and other crops from Maharashtra, India[J]. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 2019, 7(1): 114-117.
[7]	BHAVANI B, SEKHAR C, VARMA K, et al. Morphological and molecular identification of an invasive insect pest, fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda occurring on sugarcane in Andhra Pradesh, India[J]. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 2019, 7(4): 12-18.
[8]	刘杰, 姜玉英, 李虎, 等. 草地贪夜蛾为害甘蔗初报[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2019, 39(6): 35-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2019.06.006
[9]	孙东磊, 文明富, 李继虎, 等. 广东蔗区草地贪夜蛾为害调查初报[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(6): 1155-1162.
[10]	李德伟, 罗亚伟, 覃振强, 等. 广西崇左蔗田草地贪夜蛾发生为害调查及其药剂防治[J]. 热带农业科学, 2021, 41(5): 55-60.
[11]	太红坤, 郭井菲, 杨世常, 等. 草地贪夜蛾在云南德宏州甘蔗上的生物学习性及为害状观察[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(6): 75-79.
[12]	吴道慧, 李宜儒, 王思勤, 等. 玉米及玉米田3种杂草对草地贪夜蛾生长发育和产卵的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(2): 116-121.
[13]	汤清波, 王琛柱. 一种测定鳞翅目幼虫取食选择的方法: 叶碟法及其改进和注意事项[J]. 昆虫知识, 2007(6): 912-915.
[14]	MONTENEGRO I J, CORRAL S D, NAPAL G N D, et al. Antifeedant effect of polygodial and drimenol derivatives against Spodoptera frugiperda and Epilachna paenulata and quantitative structure-activity analysis[J]. Pest Management Science, 2018, 74(7): 1623-1629. doi: 10.1002/ps.4853
[15]	QIN J D. Host spacificity and nutrition of phytophagous insects[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 1962, 11(2): 169-185.
[16]	BOREGAS K, MENDES S M, WAQUIL J M, et al. Fitness stage of Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on alternative hosts[J]. Bragantia, 2013, 72(1): 61-70. doi: 10.1590/S0006-87052013000100009
[17]	曹凑贵. 生态学概论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 101.
[18]	吴正伟, 师沛琼, 曾永辉, 等. 3种寄主植物饲养的草地贪夜蛾种群生命表[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(6): 59-64.
[19]	DESHMUKH S, KALLESHWARASWAMY C M, MARUTHI M S, et al. Biology of invasive fall army worm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on maize[J]. Indian Journal of Entomology, 2018, 80(3): 540-543. doi: 10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00238.9

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	何朋阳，李贤，刘同先，张世泽. 产卵次数和寄主幼虫龄期对草地贪夜蛾寄生蜂螟蛉盘绒茧蜂生物学特性的影响. 昆虫学报. 2023(08): 1095-1104 .
2.	何朋阳，李贤，刘同先，张世泽. 草地贪夜蛾寄生蜂螟蛉盘绒茧蜂的个体发育. 中国生物防治学报. 2023(06): 1488-1494 .
3.	雷春媚，肖勇，吴雨洪，彭争科，尹飞，周小毛，李振宇，张俊杰. 四种十字花科蔬菜对草地贪夜蛾生长发育和繁殖的影响. 应用昆虫学报. 2023(04): 1108-1115 .

Other cited types(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (174) PDF downloads (387) Cited by(5)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Feeding preference and growth adaptability of Spodoptera frugiperda on different sugarcane varieties and Rottboellia cochinchinensis

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

Other cited types(2)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content