- Chinese Core Journal
- Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source journal
- Journal of Citation Report of Chinese S&T Journals (Core Edition)
| Citation: |
CHEN Guangyin, DONG Jinzhu, WU Pei, et al. Effect of different storage methods on physic-chemical properties of pig slurry[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2022, 43(4): 38-46. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202109031
|
Aiming at the great loss of nitrogen during swine slurry storage process, effects of open and sealed storage on the physic-chemical properties of swine slurry during the storage process were compared in autumn and winter to provide a theoretical reference for swine slurry storage and return to the field.
The effects of open and sealed storage on material transformation, nitrogen loss and harmlessness of pig slurry storage were compared in autumn and winter under laboratory condition. The changes of pH value, electrical conductivity (κ), chemical oxygen demand (COD), NH4+-N content, NO3−- N content, total nitrogen (TN) content, seed germination rate and heavy metal (As, Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd) contents were analyzed.
The pH value first increased and then remained relatively stable, κ, COD, the contents of TN, NO3−-N and heavy metals gradually decreased, NH4+-N content first increased and then decreased gradually, and the seed germination rate gradually increased during the storage of pig slurry. After storage, the proportion of inorganic nitrogen in pig slurry increased significantly (Except for winter open storage). Except Cu and Zn did not meet the requirements of “Water Quality Standard for Farmland Irrigation” (GB 5084—2021), As, Pb and Cd met the requirements of harmlessness and stabilization. However storage also caused serious nitrogen loss, with the nitrogen loss rates of 79.44% and 52.60% respectively in autumn and winter under open storage. Compared with open storage, sealed storage reduced the pH value of pig slurry, significantly reduced the nitrogen loss and Zn content during storage, especially the NH4+-N loss. The nitrogen loss rate of pig slurry after storage in autumn and winter decreased by 36.14 and 21.30 percentage points respectively compared with open storage. However, after storage, the κ of pig slurry was significantly higher than that of open storage, seed germination rate was slightly lower, and there was no significant effect on the contents of other heavy metals (As, Cu, Pb and Cd).
Although open storage is simple and convenient, but the nitrogen loss is serious, which reduces the fertilizer value of pig slurry after storage. Therefore, farms should be encouraged to store pig slurry in sealed condition.
| [1] |
国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴: 2021[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021.
|
| [2] |
徐鹏翔, 沈玉君, 丁京涛, 等. 规模化养猪场粪污全量收集及贮存工艺设计[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(9): 255-262.
|
| [3] |
国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于加快推进畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用的意见: 国办发〔2017〕48号[A/OL]. (2017-05-12)[2021-08-13]. https://huanbao.bjx.com.cn/news/20170613/830752.shtml.
|
| [4] |
农业部. 农业部关于印发《畜禽粪污资源化利用行动方案(2017—2020年)》的通知[A/OL]. (2017-07-07)[2021-08-13]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2017/dbq/201801/t20180103_6134011.htm.
|
| [5] |
全国畜牧总站, 中国饲料工业协会, 国家畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用科技创新联盟. 畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用主推技术模式[N]. 农民日报, 2017-12-6(6).
|
| [6] |
孔凡克, 鞠鑫鑫, 杨守军, 等. 种养结合技术在畜禽粪水处理与资源化利用中的应用[J]. 猪业科学, 2017, 34(8): 106-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5358.2017.08.035
|
| [7] |
张朋月, 丁京涛, 孟海波, 等. 牛粪水酸化贮存过程中氮形态转化的特性研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(8): 212-218.
|
| [8] |
马艳茹, 孟海波, 沈玉君, 等. 粪水酸化储存还田应用效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(15): 245-251. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.15.030
|
| [9] |
MANSYUR M, CHOI H L. Changes of physico–chemical properties of pig slurry during storage[J]. Media Peternakan, 2011, 34(3): 179-183. doi: 10.5398/medpet.2011.34.3.179
|
| [10] |
姜晨润, 孙靖博, 李华, 等. 规模化养猪场粪便贮存方式及土壤承载力[J]. 农业工程, 2019, 9(1): 35-37.
|
| [11] |
丁京涛, 张朋月, 赵立欣, 等. 养殖粪水长期贮存过程理化特性变化规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(14): 220-225.
|
| [12] |
朱海生, 董红敏, 栾冬梅, 等. 贮存高度和锯末覆盖厚度对猪粪NH3和温室气体排放量及其增温潜势的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(4): 937-943.
|
| [13] |
XUE S K, CHEN S, HERMANSON R E. Wheat straw cover for reducing ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from dairy manure storage[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1999, 42(4): 1095-1102. doi: 10.13031/2013.13257
|
| [14] |
VANDERZAAG A C, GORDON R J, GLASS V M, et al. Floating covers to reduce gas emissions from liquid manure storages: A review[J]. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2008, 24(5): 657-671. doi: 10.13031/2013.25273
|
| [15] |
PAIN B F, MISSELBROOK T H, REES Y J. Effects of nitrification inhibitor and acid addition to cattle slurry on nitrogen losses and herbage yields[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 1994, 49(2): 209-215. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb01994.x
|
| [16] |
SIMS J T, LUKA-MCCAFFERTY N J. On-farm evaluation of aluminum sulfate (alum) as a poultry litter amendment: Effect on litter properties[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2002, 31(6): 2066-2073. doi: 10.2134/jeq2002.2066
|
| [17] |
SØRENSEN P, ERIKSEN J. Effects of slurry acidification with sulphuric acid combined with aeration on the turnover and plant availability of nitrogen[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2009, 131(3/4): 240-246.
|
| [18] |
PEREIRA J L S, FIGUEIREDO V, PINTO A F M A P, et al. Effects of biochar and clinoptilolite on composition and gaseous emissions during the storage of separated liquid fraction of pig slurry[J/OL]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(16): 5652. [2021-09-20]. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165652
|
| [19] |
刘美玲. 生物炭与菌剂对猪粪氨气、甲烷和氧化亚氮排放的影响[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2020.
|
| [20] |
靳红梅, 付广青, 常志州, 等. 猪、牛粪厌氧发酵中氮素形态转化及其在沼液和沼渣中的分布[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(21): 208-214.
|
| [21] |
生态环境部. 国家市场监督管理总局. 农田灌溉水质标准: GB 5084—2021[S]. 北京: 生态环境部, 2021.
|
| [22] |
POPOVIC O, JENSEN L S. Storage temperature affects distribution of carbon, VFA, ammonia, phosphorus, copper and zinc in raw pig slurry and its separated liquid fraction[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(12): 3849-3858. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.020
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: