Effects of drip fertigation under shade on soil quality and water use of <i>Coffea</i> <i>arabica</i>

LI Huiyong; LIU Xiaogang; ZHANG Wenhui; SUN Wenyan; WU Lang; ZHANG Shuo; YANG Qiliang; XIONG Guomei

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202103007

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2022 > 43(2): 57-67. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202103007

LI Huiyong, LIU Xiaogang, ZHANG Wenhui, et al. Effects of drip fertigation under shade on soil quality and water use of Coffea arabica[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2022, 43(2): 57-67. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202103007

Citation:

PDF (858 KB)

Effects of drip fertigation under shade on soil quality and water use of Coffea arabica

Faculty of Agriculture and Food, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China

More Information

Received Date: March 03, 2021
Available Online: May 17, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To explore the effects of different coupling modes of water-fertilizer on root zone soil quality and water use of Coffea arabica under shade.

Method
C. arabica was chosen as test material, under 30% shading degree, three irrigation levels (W_H: 1.2 Ep, W_M: 1.0 Ep, W_L: 0.8 Ep) and three fertilization levels (F_H: 530.00 kg·hm⁻², F_M: 353.33 kg·hm⁻², F_L: 176.67 kg·hm⁻²) were completely designed with a total of nine treatments. The response laws of soil nutrient, microbial quantity, enzyme activities, dry mass and irrigation water use efficiency in root zone of C. arabica to water-fertilizer regulation were analyzed, and soil quality was comprehensively evaluated by combining membership function with factor analysis, and then the optimal water-fertilizer coupling mode of C. arabica was found by TOPSIS comprehensive analysis.

Result
Irrigation level and fertilization level had significant effects on soil nutrient, microbial quantity, enzyme activities (except catalase in autumn), root dry mass, stem dry mass, total dry mass and irrigation water use efficiency of C. arabica root zone. The average seasonal values of nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium contents in F_HW_L treatment were the highest. The average seasonal values of soil microorganism quantity and enzyme activities were the highest in F_MW_H treatment. Compared with F_LW_L treatment, F_HW_L treatment increased the average seasonal values of soil nitrate-nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium contents by 72.61%, 154.01% and 7.37%, respectively; F_MW_H treatment increased the average seasonal values of soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes number by 121.81%, 61.73% and 41.43%, respectively, and increased the average seasonal values of urease, catalase and phosphatase activities by 46.67%, 42.74% and 22.55%, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between soil nitrate nitrogen content and catalase activity. The number of soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes were significantly positively correlated with the activities of urease, catalase and phosphatase, respectively. The combination of membership function and factor analysis showed that soil quality index of F_MW_H treatment was the highest (0.75). The total dry mass (38 011.50 kg·hm⁻²) of F_MW_H treatment was the highest, and the irrigation water use efficiency (7.88 kg·m⁻³) of F_MW_L treatment was the highest. However, TOPSIS method showed that the comprehensive benefit (soil quality, dry matter and irrigation water use efficiency) of F_MW_M treatment ranked the first, followed by F_MW_H treatment.

Conclusion
Under 30% shading degree, F_MW_M treatment was the best coupling mode of water-fertilizer for improving soil quality and promoting efficient production of C. arabica .
- Coffea arabica,
- Drip fertigation,
- Soil quality,
- Dry mass,
- Irrigation water use efficiency

FullText(HTML)

References (39)

References

[1]	郝琨, 费良军, 刘小刚, 等. 香蕉树中度荫蔽下充分灌水提高干热区咖啡产量及品质[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(12): 72-80. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.12.009
[2]	彭有亮, 刘小刚, 韩志慧, 等. 不同蓖麻荫蔽模式下亏缺灌溉对小粒咖啡生长及土壤微生物数量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(10): 2968-2974.
[3]	CAO X, YANG P, ENGEL B A, et al. The effects of rainfall and irrigation on cherry root water uptake under drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2018, 197: 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.10.021
[4]	刘小刚, 张岩, 程金焕, 等. 水氮耦合下小粒咖啡幼树生理特性与水氮利用效率[J]. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45(8): 160-166. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2014.08.025
[5]	李欢欢, 刘浩, 庞婕, 等. 水氮互作对盆栽番茄生长发育和养分累积的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(9): 272-279. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2019.09.032
[6]	NISHA S K, SREELATHAKUMARY I. Growth and yield of watermelon Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) with different levels of fertigation and drip irrigation[J]. Journal of Krishi Vigyan, 2020, 8(2): 157. doi: 10.5958/2349-4433.2020.00033.1
[7]	王同顺, 孙保平, 冯磊, 等. 不同水分处理对甘蒙柽柳幼苗根系生长特性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(3): 591-596.
[8]	王伟华, 刘毅, 唐海明, 等. 长期施肥对稻田土壤微生物量、群落结构和活性的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(1): 430-437.
[9]	陆太伟, 蔡岸冬, 徐明岗, 等. 施用有机肥提升不同土壤团聚体有机碳含量的差异性[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(10): 2183-2193. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2017-1767
[10]	SAINJU U M. Improving nitrogen balance with irrigation practice and cropping system[J]. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 2019, 74(16): 622-631.
[11]	TIAN Z, LIU X, GU S, et al. Postponed and reduced basal nitrogen application improves nitrogen use efficiency and plant growth of winter wheat[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(12): 2648-2661. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62086-6
[12]	赵青云, 邢诒彰, 林兴军, 等. 施用咖啡果皮对咖啡幼苗生长及土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2017, 37(8): 54-59.
[13]	赵青云, 邢诒彰, 孙燕, 等. 施用土壤调节剂对咖啡苗生长及连作酸化土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38(10): 1868-1873. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2017.10.016
[14]	MARJERISON R D, MELKONIAN J, HUTSON J L, et al. Drainage and nitrate leaching from artificially drained maize fields simulated by the precision nitrogen management model[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2016, 45(6): 2044-2052. doi: 10.2134/jeq2016.04.0129
[15]	章宇阳, 刘小刚, 余宁, 等. 不同遮荫条件下施肥量对西南干热区小粒咖啡产量和肥料利用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 515-523.
[16]	刘小刚, 郝琨, 韩志慧, 等. 水氮耦合对干热区小粒咖啡产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(2): 143-150. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.02.019
[17]	郝琨, 刘小刚, 张岩, 等. 干旱胁迫−复水与氮肥耦合对小粒咖啡生长和水氮生产力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12): 4034-4042.
[18]	郝琨, 刘小刚, 韩志慧, 等. 周期性亏缺复水灌溉与氮肥耦合对小粒咖啡生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2017, 35(7): 616-626. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.16.0271
[19]	刘小刚, 李义林, 齐韵涛, 等. 干热区小粒咖啡提质增产的灌水和遮荫耦合模式[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1140-1146.
[20]	LIU X, LI F, ZHANG Y, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and nutritional quality of Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) under different N rates in dry and hot region of southwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 172: 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.007
[21]	张鲁鲁, 蔡焕杰, 王健, 等. 不同灌水量对温室甜瓜生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27(6): 58-62.
[22]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[23]	李志刚, 谢应忠. 翻埋与覆盖林木枝条改善宁夏沙化土壤性质[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(10): 174-181. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.10.023
[24]	张义, 谢永生, 郝明德, 等. 不同地表覆盖方式对苹果园土壤性状及果树生长和产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(2): 279-286.
[25]	赵彩衣, 王媛媛, 董青君, 等. 不同水肥处理对苕子和后茬玉米生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4): 161-166.
[26]	YANG W, JIAO Y, YANG M, et al. Minimizing soil nitrogen leaching by changing furrow irrigation into sprinkler fertigation in potato fields in the Northwestern China plain[J]. Water, 2020, 12(8): 2229. doi: 10.3390/w12082229
[27]	关焱, 宇万太, 李建东. 长期施肥对土壤养分库的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(6): 131-137. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2004.06.028
[28]	王涛, 杨怡钧, 邓琳, 等. 不同固体微生物菌剂对砒砂岩土壤性质和紫花苜蓿生长的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(8): 96-102. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.08.012
[29]	张凯煜, 谷洁, 王小娟, 等. 微生物有机肥对樱桃园土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(3): 1245-1252. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2019.03.042
[30]	蒋朝晖, 曾清如, 皮荷杰, 等. 不同品种尿素施入土壤后pH值的变化和氨气释放差异[J]. 环境化学, 2009, 28(2): 177-180. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-6108.2009.02.004
[31]	李艳鹏, 贺同鑫, 王清奎. 施肥对杉木林土壤酶和活性有机碳的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(10): 2722-2731.
[32]	YANG L, LI T, LI F, et al. Fertilization regulates soil enzymatic activity and fertility dynamics in a cucumber field[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2008, 116(1): 21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.11.001
[33]	GUAN S Y. Soil enzyme and its research methods[M]. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1986.
[34]	GRAMSS G, VOIGT K D, KIRSCHE B. Oxidoreductase enzymes liberated by plant roots and their effects on soil humic material[J]. Chemosphere, 1999, 38(7): 1481-1494. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00369-5
[35]	侯湖平, 王琛, 李金融, 等. 煤矸石充填不同复垦年限土壤细菌群落结构及其酶活性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(11): 4230-4240. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2017.11.028
[36]	邓浩亮, 张恒嘉, 李福强, 等. 河西绿洲菘蓝生长、光合特性及品质对膜下滴灌调亏的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(3): 321-327.
[37]	HE Y, XI B, LI G, et al. Influence of drip irrigation, nitrogen fertigation, and precipitation on soil water and nitrogen distribution, tree seasonal growth and nitrogen uptake in young triploid poplar (Populus tomentosa) plantations[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 243: 106460. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106460
[38]	张学林, 徐钧, 安婷婷, 等. 不同氮肥水平下玉米根际土壤特性与产量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(14): 2687-2699. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.14.004
[39]	丁少男, 薛萐, 刘国彬. 施肥处理对黄土丘陵区农田土壤酶活性和水溶性有机碳、氮的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(11): 2146-2154. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2015.11.016

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	冯雅琪，陈嘉慧，张静妮，隋超，陈基伟，刘志鹏，周强，刘文献. 基于重测序紫花苜蓿高蛋白、高产关联InDel分子标记开发. 草业学报. 2025(04): 137-149 .
2.	马伦，杨大兵，杜雪树，胡亮，夏明元，李进波，戚华雄，徐俊英，万丙良. 分子标记辅助选择创制长粒香型抗病水稻光温敏核不育系. 杂交水稻. 2025(02): 24-33 .
3.	张习春，李祖军，唐会会，王倩，吴朝昕，吴健强，朱速松. Pigm导入对稻瘟病高感水稻品种大粒香的抗性改良. 贵州农业科学. 2024(12): 35-42 .
4.	李友根. 不同杀菌剂对水稻稻瘟病的防效研究. 现代化农业. 2023(07): 15-17 .
5.	宋云生，于雅洁，曹鹏辉，袁彩勇. 基于分子标记辅助选择的优质、高产、抗稻瘟病水稻新品种育种综述. 江西农业学报. 2023(07): 20-25+36 .
6.	吴子帅，李虎，陈传华，刘广林，罗群昌，覃孙骞，朱其南. 常规籼稻品种的稻瘟病抗性基因及穗颈瘟抗性分析. 华南农业大学学报. 2023(05): 718-724 . 本站查看

Other cited types(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (506) PDF downloads (827) Cited by(7)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of drip fertigation under shade on soil quality and water use of Coffea arabica

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

Other cited types(1)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content