Effects of straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer on yield, sulfur accumulation and distribution in spring maize

ZHOU Lijuan; GENG Yuhui; CAO Guojun; ZHANG Meiling; LI Hao

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202010015

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2021 > 42(4): 17-24. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202010015

ZHOU Lijuan, GENG Yuhui, CAO Guojun, et al. Effects of straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer on yield, sulfur accumulation and distribution in spring maize[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2021, 42(4): 17-24. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202010015

Citation:

PDF (907 KB)

Effects of straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer on yield, sulfur accumulation and distribution in spring maize

College of Resources and Environment, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China

More Information

Received Date: October 19, 2020
Available Online: May 17, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To explore the effects of straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer on the yield and sulfur accumulation, distribution and transportation of spring maize, and provide theoretical bases for exploring the accumulation and transportation laws of sulfur fertilizer in spring maize as well as rational application of sulfur fertilizer.

Method
Two-factor split block design was used, the main plot was divided into straw returning and no straw returning, the subplot was divided into sulfur fertilizer application and no sulfur fertilizer, which formed five treatments of CK (no fertilizer), no straw returning and no sulfur fertilizer, no straw returning and sulfur fertilizer, straw returning and no sulfur fertilizer, straw returning and sulfur fertilizer. The effects of straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer application on the accumulation, distribution and transportation of sulfur in spring maize were studied through the field experiment.

Result
Straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer had a certain degree of increasing the yield. The maize yield of straw returning and sulfur fertilizer was 11.98% higher than that of straw returning and no sulfur fertilizer, and 20.34% higher than that of no straw returning and no sulfur fertilizer. Straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer could significantly increase the accumulation of sulfur in spring maize. The sulfur accumulation amount of straw returning and sulfur fertilizer was 13.37% higher than that of no straw returning and sulfur fertilizer, and 52.67% higher than that of no straw returning and no sulfur fertilizer. Sulfur fertilizer application could increase the accumulation of sulfur in plant organs. The sulfur accumulation amount of sulfur fertilizer application treatment was averagely 36.07% higher than that of no sulfur fertilizer application treatment. The sulfur accumulation amount in each organ generally behaved as grain > leaf > stem > ear. Compared with the treatment of no straw returning and no sulfur fertilizer, total sulfur transport amount of straw returning and sulfur fertilizer treatment increased by 74.54%, reaching the highest of 15.29 kg·hm ⁻², and total contribution rate of sulfur transport amount to grain increased by 17.27%.

Conclusion
Straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer can promote the accumulation of sulfur in spring maize and the transportation of sulfur from vegetative organs to grains, and ultimately improve the yield of spring maize.
- spring maize,
- yield,
- sulfur,
- straw returning,
- nutrient accumulation,
- nutrient distribution

FullText(HTML)

References (44)

References

[1]	张美玲, 耿玉辉, 曹国军, 等. 秸秆还田下施镁对土壤交换镁及春玉米镁素积累和产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3): 226-231.
[2]	张国芹, 牟建梅, 徐瑶, 等. 施硫对苋菜生长及品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(35): 48-49.
[3]	刘洋, 石慧清, 龚月桦. 硫氮配施对持绿型小麦氮素运转及叶片衰老的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(6): 1206-1213.
[4]	司贤宗, 张翔, 索炎炎, 等. 施硫对花生产质量和硫吸收利用的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(6): 59-63.
[5]	刘崇群. 中国南方土壤硫的状况和对硫肥的需求[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 1995(3): 14-18.
[6]	BEARCHELL S J, FRAAIJE B A, SHAW M W, et al. Wheat archive links long-term fungal pathogen population dynamics to air pollution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(15): 5438-5442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501596102
[7]	MIYAKE T, SAMMOTO H, KANAYAMA M, et al. Role of the sulphate assimilation pathway in utilization of glutathione as a sulphur source by Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Yeast, 1999, 15(14): 1449-1457. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199910)15:14<1449::AID-YEA469>3.0.CO;2-S
[8]	DAOUDI M, SINGH R. Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on growth and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2017, 6(6): 1930-1935. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.225
[9]	李惠民, 王保莉. 玉米硫素营养状况及应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2008, 10(4): 16-21.
[10]	陈国安. 我国东北黑土地区农业中的硫素问题[J]. 中国农学通报, 1994, 10(3): 36-38.
[11]	吴宇, 高蕾, 曹民杰, 等. 植物硫营养代谢、调控与生物学功能[J]. 植物学通报, 2007, 24(6): 735-761.
[12]	刘文国, 赵强, 杨艳美. 秸秆还田处理对土壤理化性状及玉米产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(27): 111-117.
[13]	张宇飞, 刘立志, 马昱萱, 等. 耕作和秸秆还田方式对玉米产量及钾素积累转运的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(2): 122-127.
[14]	高日平, 赵思华, 刁生鹏, 等. 秸秆还田对黄土风沙区土壤微生物、酶活性及作物产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2019, 50(6): 1370-1377.
[15]	LI H, DAI M W, DAI S L, et al. Current status and environment impact of direct straw return in China’s cropland: A review[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 159: 293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.014
[16]	鲍彩英. 玉米秸秆还田技术[J]. 农民致富之友, 2018(21): 31.
[17]	邹文秀, 韩晓增, 陆欣春, 等. 秸秆还田后效对玉米氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(20): 4237-4247.
[18]	JIANG H, HAN X Z, ZOU W X, et al. Seasonal and long-term changes in soil physical properties and organic carbon fractions as affected by manure application rates in the Mollisol region of Northeast China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2018, 268: 133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.007
[19]	李荣, 侯贤清, 吴鹏年, 等. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对土壤性状与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(8): 289-298.
[20]	朱泽亮, 陶胜. 钾肥和稻草对水稻生长及产量的影响[J]. 土壤, 1992(6): 310-311.
[21]	马春英, 李雁鸣, 韩金玲. 不同种类硫肥对冬小麦光合性能和子粒产量性状的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2004, 19(1): 67-70.
[22]	谢迎新, 朱云集, 郭天财. 施用硫肥对两种穗型冬小麦品种群体生理、产量和品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2003, 23(1): 44-48.
[23]	谢迎新, 刘超, 朱云集, 等. 氮、硫配施对冬小麦氮素利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(1): 64-71.
[24]	ZHAO F J, SALMON S E, WITHERS P J, et al. Variation in the breadmaking quality and rheological properties of wheat in relation to sulphur nutrition under field conditions[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 1999, 30(1): 19-31. doi: 10.1006/jcrs.1998.0244
[25]	张庆栋, 李晓菲, 张淑艳, 等. 中微量元素锌在玉米上的施用效果试验[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2019(10): 128-129.
[26]	MANDAL K G, SINHA A C. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, oil content and nutrient uptake of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in foothills soils of eastern India[J]. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 2002, 47(1): 109-113.
[27]	RILEY N G, ZHAO F J, MCGRATH S P. Availability of different forms of sulphur fertilisers to wheat and oilseed rape[J]. Plant and Soil, 2000, 222(1/2): 139-147. doi: 10.1023/A:1004757503831
[28]	崔俊讲, 周明先, 张红英, 等. 秸秆还田条件下不同氮肥用量对冬小麦产量及氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 农学学报, 2020, 10(8): 47-51.
[29]	白伟, 张立祯, 逄焕成, 等. 秸秆还田配施氮肥对东北春玉米光合性能和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12): 1845-1855.
[30]	战秀梅, 彭靖, 李秀龙, 等. 耕作及秸秆还田方式对春玉米产量及土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(3): 204-209.
[31]	周怀平, 解文艳, 关春林, 等. 长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米产量、效益及水分利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 321-330.
[32]	赵玉霞, 李娜, 王文岩, 等. 施用硫肥对陕西关中地区冬小麦氮、硫吸收与转运及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(6): 1321-1328.
[33]	曹殿云. 硫、锌肥对玉米生长发育、元素吸收及产量的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2017.
[34]	曹殿云, 王宏伟, 徐晓旭. 硫肥用量对玉米氮硫吸收分配和产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(9): 1298-1305.
[35]	崔彦宏, 张桂银, 郭景伦, 等. 高产夏玉米硫的吸收与再分配研究[J]. 玉米科学, 1993, 1(1): 48-52.
[36]	王空军, 胡昌浩, 董树亭. 夏玉米硫素吸收与时空分布研究[J]. 作物学报, 2000, 26(6): 899-904.
[37]	朱庆杰. 浅析玉米秸秆还田技术的利弊[J]. 种子科技, 2019, 37(15): 145.
[38]	张维乐, 戴志刚, 任涛, 等. 不同水旱轮作体系秸秆还田与氮肥运筹对作物产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(7): 1254-1266.
[39]	党红凯, 孙亚辉, 张馨文, 等. 超高产冬小麦硫素的吸收、积累和分配的研究[C]//中国作物学会. 作物逆境生理研究进展: 中国作物生理第十次学术研讨会文集. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 109-117.
[40]	刘宝存, 吴静, 孙明德. 夏玉米硫的吸收、累积及分配的研究[C]//中国土壤学会青年工作委员会. 青年学者论土壤与植物营养科学: 第七届全国青年土壤暨第二届全国青年植物营养科学工作者学术讨论会论文集. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000: 340-345.
[41]	于淼, 王志学, 吴红艳, 等. 秸秆还田技术对红干椒植株以及土壤中微量元素的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(2): 32-35.
[42]	柳开楼, 张会民, 韩天富, 等. 长期化肥和有机肥施用对双季稻根茬生物量及养分积累特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(18): 3540-3548.
[43]	王东, 于振文, 王旭东. 硫肥对冬小麦硫素吸收分配和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2003, 29(5): 791-793.
[44]	张军, 吴秀宁, 陈新宏. 小麦骨干品种小偃22研究进展[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2017, 63(2): 65-69.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	李秀玉，唐继敏，殷晓洁，刘一飞，李子康. 应用优化最大熵模型的珍稀濒危玉兰属物种适生区预测. 东北林业大学学报. 2025(01): 64-72 .
2.	李益敏，向倩英，邓选伦，冯显杰. 基于优化MaxEnt模型的怒江州滑坡易发性评价. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2025(01): 57-67 .
3.	姜垒，胡喻华，吴玉芬，梁键明，蒋庆莲，张铭，谭淦，何春梅，韦霄，施诗，唐光大. 基于MaxEnt模型的广东省红豆属植物潜在适生区研究. 广西科学. 2024(01): 149-166 .
4.	张春玲，杨毅哲，陈丽丽，陈瑜，王佳，李欣迪，张献瑞，史岩，谢军，武艺凡，刘刚. 外来植物节节麦入侵过程中的生态位进化与入侵潜力研究. 中国农学通报. 2024(29): 120-130 .
5.	唐继敏，殷晓洁，李干，高伟杰，黎宏琴. 气候变化下中国珍稀濒危拟单性木兰属适生区模拟及GAP分析. 西南农业学报. 2024(09): 2120-2129 .
6.	刘磊，赵立娟，刘佳奇，张辉盛，张志伟，黄瑞芬，高瑞贺. 基于优化的MaxEnt模型预测气候变化下松褐天牛在我国的潜在适生区. 林业科学. 2024(11): 139-148 .
7.	徐扬，张琦，郭线茹，赵曼，李为争，席玉强，王高平，胡明鑫，张利娟. 当前和未来气候下龟纹瓢虫在中国的适生区预测. 环境昆虫学报. 2024(06): 1391-1400 .
8.	谢梦琪，寸得娇，姚晓燕，王飞，李兰花，田娜. 气候变化对我国黑胸大蠊分布的影响研究. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志. 2023(04): 542-547 .
9.	张雅茜，王淋，包福海，张淑宁，红梅，刘一超，陈俊兴，蔺悦，敖敦，白玉娥，包文泉. 应用最大熵模型预测的欧李潜在适生区分布及气候变化对其的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2023(11): 54-62 .

Other cited types(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (549) PDF downloads (660) Cited by(11)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of straw returning combining with sulfur fertilizer on yield, sulfur accumulation and distribution in spring maize

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

Other cited types(2)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content