Citation: | HAN Dongmei, CHEN Yongqi, ZHANG Jiali, et al. Comparison of different preharvest technologies to regulate and control storage quality of Dimocarpus longan fruit[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2021, 42(1): 61-71. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202004030 |
To investigate the influence of fruit maturity at harvest, tree vigour and preharvest regulation on the storage performance and shelf life of Dimocarpus longan fruit.
D. longan Lour. cv. Shixia fruits were used as experimental material. Three groups of single factor experiments were designed with fruit maturity, tree vigour and preharvest regulation as the experimental factors, and each factor had three levels. The harvested fruits were treated using SO2-released paper and were stored at (5±1) ℃ for 50 days. We observed the good fruit rate after storage (STGFR), and the good fruit rate during shelf life (SFGFR) at (25±1) ℃. The storage performances of fruits with different preharvest treatments were compared.
Fruits harvested at appropriate maturity (80%−85% maturity degree) had higher STGFR and SFGFR than those at full maturity (95%−100% maturity degree, CK) and over maturity, and the over matured fruits performed the worst. Both preharvest disease control and nutrition regulation treatments resulted in fruits with higher STGFR and SFGFR compared to CK with significant differences (P<0.01). Among them, disease control treatment performed the best with 93.26% STGFR, followed by nutrition regulation treatment (84.23%), and the worst was CK (67.71%). Among three types of trees with different vigor, fruits from strong tree had the best storability, followed by weak tree, and CK(medium tree) was the worst. Among all treatments, the fruit storability of disease control treatment was the best, with a SFGFR of 84.86% after four days on shelf, followed by strong tree, nutrition regulation and week tree treatments, with SFGFR of 63.23%, 56.14% and 51.12% respectively, and the worst was the over matured fruit (26.91%). The results of correlation analysis indicated that the content of total soluble solids in fruit pulp at harvest was significantly negatively correlated with the amount of SO2 residue in pulp and mass loss rate during shelf life, but not correlated with storability.
During the fruit growth period of D. longan, performing disease control and nutrition regulation, keeping reasonable tree vigour with suitable fruit setting rate, and harvesting at appropriate maturity can help the fruit obtain better storability and longer shelf life.
[1] |
SIDDIQUI M W. Principles and practices for quality maintenance, postharvest biology and technology of horticultural crops[M]. New Jersey: Apple Academic Press, 2015: 89-95.
|
[2] |
REICHEL M, CARLE R, SRUAMSIRI P, et al. Influence of harvest maturity on quality and shelf-life of litchi fruit (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2010, 57(3): 162-175. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.04.005
|
[3] |
SALVADOR A, ARNAL L, BESADA C, et al. Physiological and structural changes during ripening and deastringency treatment of persimmon fruit cv. ‘Rojo Brillante’[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2007, 46(2): 181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.05.003
|
[4] |
JU Z G, DUAN Y S, JU Z Q, et al. Different responses of 'Snow Giant' and 'Elegant Lady' peaches to fruit maturity and storage temperature[J]. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2000, 75(1): 86-91.
|
[5] |
高豪杰, 贾志伟, 李雯, 等. 采收成熟度与果实贮藏保鲜关系的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(5): 2897-2898. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2012.05.126
|
[6] |
DONG T, XIA R X, XIAO Z Y, et al. Effect of pre-harvest application of calcium and boron on dietary fibre, hydrolases and ultrastructure in ‘Cara Cara’ navel orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) fruit[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2009, 121(3): 272-277. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.02.003
|
[7] |
SIDDIQUI M W. Preharvest modulation of postharvest fruit and vegetable quality[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018: 169-182.
|
[8] |
ROKAYA P R, BARAL D R, GAUTAM D M, et al. Effect of pre-harvest application of gibberellic acid on fruit quality and shelf life of mandarin (Citrus reticulata blanco)[J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2016(7): 1033-1039.
|
[9] |
韩冬梅, 杨武, 牛佳佳, 等. 龙眼果实低温贮藏性能常规指标评价体系的构建[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(9): 1685-1693. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2015.09.023
|
[10] |
韩冬梅, 李建光, 李荣, 等. 不同龙眼品种果实的耐贮性比较[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2010, 31(4): 6-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2010.04.002
|
[11] |
韩冬梅, 曾婷, 李建光, 等. 龙眼果实挂树成熟与退糖期间的解剖学结构比较[J]. 广东农业科学, 2018, 45(4): 43-50.
|
[12] |
张居念, 林河通, 谢联辉, 等. 龙眼果实潜伏性病原真菌的初步研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2006, 27(4): 78-82. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2006.04.017
|
[13] |
陈艺晖, 林河通, 林艺芬, 等. 拟茎点霉侵染对龙眼果实采后果皮褐变和活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(23): 4858-4866.
|
[14] |
刘爱媛, 陈维信, 程海慧. 龙眼采后炭疽病及对贮藏效果的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2006, 23(1): 77-80.
|
[15] |
叶素莲, 陈金洪. 钙硫锌硼肥对龙眼产量及品质的影响[J]. 广西农业科学, 2009, 40(6): 696-699.
|
[16] |
韦剑锋, 梁和, 韦冬萍, 等. 钙硼营养对龙眼果实品质及耐贮性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(9): 311-314. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2006.09.075
|
[17] |
韦剑锋, 韦冬萍, 何燕文, 等. 喷施钙硼对龙眼叶片和果实矿质营养状况的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2007, 20(1): 77-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2007.01.018
|
[18] |
LUO T, NIU J J, GUO X M, et al. Preharvest zinc sulfate spray improves the storability of longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.)fruits by protecting the cell wall components and antioxidants of pericarp[J]. Journal Science of Food and Agriculture, 2019, 99(3): 1098-1107. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9277
|
[19] |
牛佳佳. 采前矿质营养调控龙眼果实贮藏品质及其分子基础研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2014.
|
[20] |
韩冬梅, 吴振先, 杨武, 等. 龙眼果实品质评价理化指标体系的构建[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(3): 503-511.
|
[21] |
韩冬梅, 杨武, 吴振先, 等. 龙眼果实贮藏品质理化指标评估体系的构建[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2015, 36(6): 39-46. doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2015.06.007
|
[22] |
SHUAI L, LI J, NIU J J, et al. Sucrose-metabolizing enzymes and their genes in the arils of two Dimocarpus longan cultivars[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2016, 60(4): 741-748. doi: 10.1007/s10535-016-0602-x
|
[23] |
吴振先, 韩冬梅. 一种龙眼保鲜纸的应用: ZL 201610227848.7[P]. 2018-03-16.
|
[24] |
中华人民共和国农业部. 水果、蔬菜及其制品中二氧化硫总量的测定: NY/T 1435—2007[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
|
[25] |
中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 食品中亚硫酸盐的测定: GB/T 5009.34—2003[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.
|
[26] |
邓维斌, 唐兴艳, 胡大权, 等. SPSS19.0统计分析实用教程[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2013: 139-141.
|
[27] |
中华人民共和国农业部. 热带水果中二氧化硫残留限量: NY 1440—2007[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
|
[28] |
WOOLF A B, BOWEN J H, FERGUSON I B. Preharvest exposure to the sun influences postharvest responses of ‘Hass’ avocado fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 1999, 15(2): 143-153. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00077-5
|
[29] |
刘兆东. 果树采前管理对果品质量的影响及优化措施分析[J]. 中国果菜, 2017, 37(3): 28-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1038.2017.03.007
|
[30] |
丁云龙, 张斌斌, 陈星星, 等. 桃树冠不同部位果实低温贮藏期间的品质变化[J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(12): 1731-1743.
|
[31] |
KALAJ Y R, GEYER M, HERPPICH W B, et al. Interaction of maximum daily trunk shrinkage and fruit quality in European plum[J]. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 2018, 60(2): 105-112.
|
[32] |
吴大军, 陈妙金, 孙奇男, 等. 采前避雨栽培影响桃果实采后贮藏品质[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(1): 96-105.
|
[33] |
韩冬梅, 吴振先, 李建光, 等. 龙眼果实采收成熟度与耐贮性关系研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2008, 29(4): 12-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2008.04.003
|
[34] |
韩冬梅, 李建光, 潘学文, 等. 龙眼果实的主要经济性状与耐贮性关系研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2009, 38(6): 12-15.
|
[35] |
CHEN M Y, LIN H T, ZHANG S H, et al. Effects of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) treatment on postharvest physiology, quality and storage behavior of longan fruit[J]. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2015, 8(5): 971-982.
|
[36] |
WANG H, QIAN Z J, MA S M, et al. Energy status of ripening and postharvest senescent fruit of litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.)[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2013, 13: 55.
|
1. |
吴迪,栗云鹏,巴洪宇,杜鹃,吴惠明,张启龙,冯小宇,周德刚. 美洲型猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒实时荧光RT-PCR定量检测试剂盒测量不确定度研究. 中国动物检疫. 2020(05): 94-100 .
![]() |