Citation: | HUANG Jie, YANG Huixiao, LIAO Huanqin, et al. Analyses of differentially expressed genes of Eucalyptus urophylla in response to single and dual factor stresses of water and nutrient[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2020, 41(5): 73-81. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202002002 |
To compare the molecular response mechanisms of Eucalyptus urophylla under single and dual factor stresses of water and nutrient, and provide insight and molecular basis for resistance breeding of Eucalyptus.
The experiment selected E. urophylla clone ZQUA44 as matetial, and set three stress treatments and one control (CK). Water and nutrient deficiency stress: 20%−40% field moisture capacity, applying 250 g calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer (CMPF) as base fertilizer; Water deficiency stress: 20%−40% field moisture capacity, applying 250 g CMPF and 150 g compound fertilizer as base fertilizer; Nutrient deficiency stress: 60%−80% field moisture capacity, applying 250 g CMPF as base fertilizer; CK: 60%−80% field moisture capacity, applying 250 g CMPF and 150 g compound fertilizer as base fertilizer. The urea of 100 g was applied at two months after planting, 150 g compound fertilizer in August, and 100 g compound fertilizer in the next spring in water deficiency stress and control treatments. High-throughput transcriptome sequencing was performed to E. urophylla leaves in different stress treatments, and the growth indexes of plant were determined. After assembling, differentially expressed genes were obtained using bioinformatics methods, and GO functional annotations and KEGG pathway analyses were performed. Finally, four differentially expressed genes with different expression patterns were randomly selected for qRT-PCR to validate the reliability of transcripcome sequencing data.
All three stress treatments partly suppressed the growth and development ofE. urophylla. Most of the growth indexes of E. urophylla in three stress treatments were significantly lower than those in control. A total of 5 547 differentially expressed genes were obtained in water and nutrient deficiency treatment, water deficiency treatment and nutrient deficiency treatment. The 2 585, 1 472 and 1 490 differentially expressed genes were obtained, including 1 195, 222 and 665 up-regulated genes and 1 390, 1 250 and 825 down-regulated genes, respectively. The 155, 75, 108 gene encoding transcription factors were respectively obtained in three stress treatments. The differentially expressed genes in three stress treatments were all significantly enriched in phenylpropane biosynthetic pathway. The qRT-PCR results were basically consistent with transcriptome sequencing results, indicating that the sequencing results were credible.
The transcriptional changes of E. urophylla in three stress treatments have obvious universality and specificity, and the effects of dual factor stress on plant growth are more than that of single factor stress. Plant may have different responce modes in different stress conditions.
[1] |
ZHOU Q, GUO J J, HE C T, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis between low- and high-cadmium-accumulating genotypes of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) in response to cadmium stress[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2016, 50(12): 6485-6494. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06326
|
[2] |
JOHNSON S M, LIM F L, FINKLER A, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of Sorghum bicolor responding to combined heat and drought stress[J]. BMC Genomics, 2014: 15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-456.
|
[3] |
AHUJA I, DE VOS R C H, BONES A M, et al. Plant molecular stress responses face climate change[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2010, 15(12): 664-674. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.002
|
[4] |
MITTLER R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2006, 11(1): 15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002
|
[5] |
RIZHSKY L, LIANG H J, SHUMAN J, et al. When defense pathways collide: The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress[J]. Plant Physiol, 2004, 134(4): 1683-1696. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.033431
|
[6] |
RAMPINO P, MITA G, FASANO P, et al. Novel durum wheat genes up-regulated in response to a combination of heat and drought stress[J]. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2012, 56: 72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.04.006
|
[7] |
RIZHSKY L, LIANG H J, MITTLER R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco[J]. Plant Physiol, 2002, 130(3): 1143-1151.
|
[8] |
MESEKA S, MENKIR A, BOSSEY B, et al. Performance assessment of drought tolerant maize hybrids under combined drought and heat stress[J]. Agronomy-Basel, 2018, 8(12). doi: 10.3390/agronomy8120274
|
[9] |
MACHADO S, PAULSEN G M. Combined effects of drought and high temperature on water relations of wheat and sorghum[J]. Plant Soil, 2001, 233(2): 179-187
|
[10] |
张胜. 侧柏对干旱与自然低温胁迫响应的分子机制研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017.
|
[11] |
潘文, 张卫华, 杨会肖, 等. 尾叶桉苯丙氨酸解氨酶基因的克隆、表达与单核苷酸多态性分析[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2018, 39(2): 89-94. doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2018.02.014
|
[12] |
赛佳. 根冠比[EB/OL]. [2019-12-20]. https://baike.sogou.com/v8081475.htm?fromTitle.
|
[13] |
曹维. 苗期玉米叶片响应非生物胁迫的转录组分析[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2017.
|
[14] |
杨献光, 梁卫红, 齐志广, 等. 植物非生物胁迫应答的分子机制[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(6): 158-161. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2006.06.034
|
[15] |
周峰. 干旱胁迫对植物生长及其生理的影响[J]. 北京农业, 2014.
|
[16] |
白禹, 卯丹, 王继玥. 黄酮类物质的生物合成及对干旱胁迫响应的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(16): 24-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2018.16.008
|
[17] |
王冰, 程宪国. 干旱、高盐及低温胁迫下植物生理及转录因子的应答调控[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1565-1574. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17312
|
[18] |
ABE H, URAO T, ITO T, et al. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling[J]. Plant Cell, 2003, 15(1): 63-78. doi: 10.1105/tpc.006130
|
[19] |
SEO P J, XIANG F, QIAO M, et al. The MYB96 transcription factor mediates abscisic acid signaling during drought stress response in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Physiol, 2009, 151(1): 275-289. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.144220
|
[20] |
关淑艳, 焦鹏, 蒋振忠, 等. MYB转录因子在植物非生物胁迫中的研究进展[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2019, 41(3): 253-260.
|
[21] |
戚莹雪, 王蕾, 王尧尧, 等. 植物WRKY类转录因子在非生物胁迫下的功能与作用机制[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(18): 5973-5979.
|
[22] |
MA T, LI M, ZHAO A, et al. LcWRKY5: An unknown function gene from sheepgrass improves drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2014, 33(9): 1507-1518. doi: 10.1007/s00299-014-1634-3
|
[23] |
CHEN Y F, LI L Q, XU Q, et al. The WRKY6 transcription factor modulates PHOSPHATE1 expression in response to low Pi stress in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell, 2009, 21(11): 3554-3566. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.064980
|
[24] |
于燕杰, 张大兵, 袁政. WOX蛋白家族调控干细胞发育分子机制的研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2016, 51(4): 565-574. doi: 10.11983/CBB15137
|
[25] |
HIRAKAWA Y, KONDO Y, FUKUDA H. TDIF peptide signaling regulates vascular stem cell proliferation via the WOX4 homeobox gene in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell, 2010, 22(8): 2618-2629. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.076083
|
[26] |
JI J, STRABLE J, SHIMIZU R, et al. WOX4 promotes procambial development[J]. Plant Physiol, 2010, 152(3): 1346-1356. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.149641
|