Citation: | PENG Weixin, YANG Yuantong, FENG Jiayi, et al. Improvement of sewage sludge and enhanced measure on soil of rare earth mine wasteland[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2020, 41(5): 65-72. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202001007 |
To study the improvement effect of urban sewage sludge addition on soil of rare earth mine wasteland, and the strengthening effects of adding bagasse and soil conditioner on the basis of sewage sludge, and provide a theoretical guidance for soil improvement of rare earth mining areas and utilization of urban sewage sludge resources.
The soil of rare earth mine wasteland was selected as research object. Three treatments including adding sewage sludge (T1), adding sewage sludge and bagasse (T2), adding sewage sludge, bagasse and soil conditioner (T3) were set. The soil of rare earth mine wasteland was used as control (CK). Canavalia gladiata was chosen as test material to verify soil improvement effect through pot experiment. The physicochemical properties of testing soil and C. gladiata growth indexes were determined, and the soil improvement effects of different treatments were comprehensively analyzed by principal component analysis and fuzzy membership function analysis.
Compared with the control, three treatments greatly improved the physicochemical properties of soil in mining area, promoted the growth of C. gladiata and the absorption of N, P and K nutrient elements. T1 reduced soil bulk density by 27.64%, increased total porosity by 23.91%, increased capillary water holding capacity by 42.41%, increased the content of organic matter by 11.01 times, and meanwhile greatly increased the contents of total P, alkaline hydrolytic N, available P and available K. The soil physical properties of T2 were better than those of T1, with organic matter content increased by 25.9% and pH increased by 0.32. The soil pH (7.22) of T3 was the highest, which was 49.17% higher than T2, and the contents of available P and available K increased by 0.46% and 11.05% respectively. The total plant biomasses of T2 and T3 were significantly higher than those of T1 and CK, and there was no significant difference between T2 and T3. The accumulations of N, P and K per plant reached the maximums in T2, which were 934.43, 172.07 and 931.35 mg respectively, and significantly different from other treatments. The average subordinate function values of CK, T1, T2 and T3 were 0.06, 0.56, 0.83, 0.90 respectively, and the soil improvement effects were ranked as T3>T2>T1.
The addition of urban sewage sludge significantly improves the soil of mining area, and the improvement effect is significantly enhanced by adding bagasse and soil conditioner on the basis of adding sewage sludge.
[1] |
罗才贵, 罗仙平, 苏佳, 等. 离子型稀土矿山环境问题及其治理方法[J]. 金属矿山, 2014(6): 91-96.
|
[2] |
钟志刚, 周贺鹏, 胡洁, 等. 南方离子型稀土矿绿色提取技术研究进展[J]. 金属矿山, 2017(12): 76-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1250.2017.12.016
|
[3] |
郭伟, 付瑞英, 赵仁鑫, 等. 稀土开发导致的环境问题及土壤稀土污染治理措施初探[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2014, 14(5): 245-251.
|
[4] |
曾敏, 彭红霞, 刘凤梅, 等. 安远新龙稀土矿山地质环境综合治理研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2011(3): 136-139.
|
[5] |
闫美, 王璐, 郝存忠, 等. 煤矿废弃地生态修复的土壤有机碳效应[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(5): 1838-1845.
|
[6] |
白中科, 周伟, 王金满, 等. 再论矿区生态系统恢复重建[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018, 32(11): 1-9.
|
[7] |
李小飞, 陈志彪, 陈志强. 南方稀土采矿恢复地土壤稀土元素含量及植物吸收特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(8): 2126-2132.
|
[8] |
ROBINSON B, GREEN S, MILLS T M, et al. Phytoremediation: Using plants as biopumps to improve degraded environments[J]. Soil Res, 2003, 41(3): 599-611. doi: 10.1071/SR02131
|
[9] |
陈莺燕, 刘文深, 丁铿博, 等. 有机改良剂及生物炭对离子型稀土矿尾砂地生态修复的改良探究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(12): 4769-4778.
|
[10] |
何士龙, 钱奎梅, 王丽萍, 等. 污泥在矿区废弃地复垦中的应用实验[J]. 环境科技, 2009, 22(4): 15-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4829.2009.04.005
|
[11] |
赖发英, 王国锋, 孙永明, 等. 城市污泥对矿区土壤性状的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2010, 24(2): 349-354. doi: 10.11869/hnxb.2010.02.0349
|
[12] |
徐雪云, 朱航, 邹华. 混合污泥堆肥在无锡茶园的应用研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2013, 34(2): 277-280. doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2013.02.029
|
[13] |
何飞飞, 曾建兵, 吴爱平, 等. 改良剂修复利用镉污染菜地土壤的田间效应研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(31): 247-251. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.31.047
|
[14] |
孙文博, 莫创荣, 安鸿雪, 等. 施用蔗渣对土壤镉赋存形态和生物有效性的影响研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(9): 1793-1799. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2013.09.013
|
[15] |
黄庆, 林小明, 柯玉诗, 等. 多元酸性土壤调理剂在辣椒上的施用效果研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2007, 34(1): 42-44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2007.01.019
|
[16] |
中国科学院《中国植物志》编委会. 中国植物志: 第41卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995: 208.
|
[17] |
DE MELO RANGEL W, DE OLIVEIRA LONGATTI S M, FERREIRA P A A, et al. Leguminosae native nodulating bacteria from a gold mine As-contaminated soil: Multi-resistance to trace elements, and possible role in plant growth and mineral nutrition[J]. Int J Phytorem, 2017, 19(10): 925-936. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2017.1303812
|
[18] |
董坚. 一种钼尾矿酸性土壤调理剂及其生产工艺: CN102826926A[P]. 2012-12-19.
|
[19] |
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 城镇污水处理厂污泥处置土地改良用泥质: GB/T24600—2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
|
[20] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[21] |
王婧, 莫其锋, 储双双, 等. 污泥堆肥对园林植物合果芋(Syngonium podophyllum)生长及重金属吸收累积的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(6): 1752-1758.
|
[22] |
梁丹妮, 郭兴燕, 兰剑. 6份沿阶草种质对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(2): 184-191. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0346
|
[23] |
万俐, 赵君凤, 付永胜, 等. 不同絮凝剂对活性污泥特性及除污效能的影响研究[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(2): 49-52.
|
[24] |
黄殿男, 谭杰, 傅金祥, 等. 城市污水处理厂污泥对沙漠化土壤的改良效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1): 326-330.
|
[25] |
丘锦荣, 卫泽斌, 吴长安, 等. 不同干燥处理对城市污泥物理性质和农业利用的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(1): 106-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2009.01.021
|
[26] |
孙永明, 郭衡焕, 孙辉明, 等. 城市污泥在矿区废弃地复垦中应用的可行性研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2008, 31(6): 28-31.
|
[27] |
张硕, 余宏军, 蒋卫杰. 发酵玉米芯或甘蔗渣基质的黄瓜育苗效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(11): 244-250.
|
[28] |
陈婵婵, 肖斌, 余有本, 等. 陕南茶园土壤有机质和pH值空间变异及其与速效养分的相关性[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(1): 182-188.
|
[29] |
王洋, 刘景双, 王金达, 等. 土壤pH值对冻融黑土重金属Cd赋存形态的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(2): 574-578. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2008.02.032
|
[30] |
吴敏, 韦家少, 孙海东, 等. 植物物料及其生物炭对酸性土壤的改良[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(12): 2276-2282. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2016.12.006
|
[31] |
付克强, 王殿武, 李贵宝, 等. 城市污泥与湖泊底泥土地利用对土壤−植物系统中养分及重金属Cd, Pb的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(4): 62-66. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.04.015
|
[32] |
张林丰, 任乐辉, 何月田, 等. 利用制糖副产物土壤化赤泥的效果[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(4): 1228-1236. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201710120
|
[33] |
储双双, 赖灿, WEI X H, 等. 污泥堆肥混合基质对香彩雀生长开花的影响及植物适应性评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(4): 966-972.
|
[34] |
刘强, 陈玲, 邱家洲, 等. 污泥堆肥对园林植物生长及重金属积累的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(6): 870-875. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2010.06.016
|
[35] |
安志装, 王校常, 施卫明, 等. 重金属与营养元素交互作用的植物生理效应[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(4): 392-396.
|
[36] |
杨旭初, 叶会财, 李大明, 等. 基于模糊数学和主成分分析的长期施肥红壤旱地土壤肥力评价[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(3): 79-84. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20180313
|
[37] |
吴海燕, 金荣德, 范作伟, 等. 基于主成分和聚类分析的黑土肥力质量评价[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(2): 325-334. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17225
|
[38] |
刘梦娇, 夏少攀, 王峻, 等. 城市污泥农用对植物−土壤系统的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12): 4134-4142.
|
[39] |
杨帅, 高照良, 白皓, 等. 矿山废弃地植物种植模式对土壤改良效果[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(3): 134-140.
|