CHEN Dongping, CHEN Zhiting, XU Hanhong, et al. Host type identification of Spodoptera frugiperda invading in Guangzhou by different molecular markers[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2020, 41(1): 17-21. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201906016
    Citation: CHEN Dongping, CHEN Zhiting, XU Hanhong, et al. Host type identification of Spodoptera frugiperda invading in Guangzhou by different molecular markers[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2020, 41(1): 17-21. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201906016

    Host type identification of Spodoptera frugiperda invading in Guangzhou by different molecular markers

    More Information
    • Received Date: June 07, 2019
    • Available Online: May 17, 2023
    • Objective 

      Different molecular markers were used to identify the host types of Spodoptera frugiperda which invaded Guangzhou, in order to monitor the diffusion of insect sources and to offer forecasting and early warning of insect conditions.

      Method 

      The host types of S. frugiperda collected from maize plants in Guangzhou were identified using three COI gene markers (COI-A, COI-B and COI-C) and the Tpi gene marker. The identification results were compared.

      Result 

      Based on sequence alignment and haplotype analysis, S. frugiperda samples invading Guangzhou were identified as the “rice strain” using COI-A,COI-B and COI-C markers. A sample was identified to be the hybrid of S. frugiperda and Mythimna separate using COI-A marker. S. frugiperda samples invading Guangzhou were identified as the “corn strain” using the Tpi gene marker, and the 126th and 127th bp were GA/AT heterozygous.

      Conclusion 

      The COI-A marker has relatively strong ability of species identification as it can identify the hybridization events between S. frugiperda and other close related species. Tpi marker can be used to identify host types of S. frugiperda. Combining the two markers will improve the identification accuracy. The development of microsatellite markers or functional gene markers related to host feeding would enable precise identification of the host types.

    • [1]
      SPARKSAN. A review of the biology of the fall armyworm[J]. Fla Entomol, 1979, 62(2): 82-87. doi: 10.2307/3494083
      [2]
      GOUIN A, BRETAUDEAU A, NAM K, et al. Two genomes of highly polyphagous lepidopteran pests (Spodoptera frugiperda, Noctuidae) with different host-plant ranges[J]. Sci Rep-UK, 2017, 7(1): 11816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10461-4
      [3]
      DUMAS P, LEGEAI F, LEMAITRE C, et al. Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host-plant variants: Two host strains or two distinct species?[J]. Genetica, 2015, 143(3): 305-316. doi: 10.1007/s10709-015-9829-2
      [4]
      MURÚA M G, NAGOSHI R N, DOS SANTOS D A, et al. Demonstration using field collections that Argentina fall armyworm populations exhibit strain-specific host plant preferences[J]. J Econ Entomol, 2015, 108(5): 203.
      [5]
      UNBEHEND M, HÄNNIGER S, MEAGHER R L, et al. Pheromonal divergence between two strains of Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. J Chem Ecol, 2013, 39(3): 364-376. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0263-6
      [6]
      FOTSO KUATE A, HANNA R, DOUMTSOP FOTIO A R P, et al. Spodoptera frugiperda Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Cameroon: Case study on its distribution, damage, pesticide use, genetic differentiation and host plants[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(4): e0215749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215749
      [7]
      HAJIBABAEI M, JANZEN D H, BURNS J M, et al. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera[J]. P Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103(4): 968-971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510466103
      [8]
      NAGOSHI R N, MEAGHER R L, HAYROE M. Inferring the annual migration patterns of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the United States from mitochondrial haplotypes[J]. Ecol Evol, 2012, 2(7): 1458-1467. doi: 10.1002/ece3.268
      [9]
      LEVY H C, GARCIA-MARUNIAK A, MARUNIAK J E. Strain identification of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: noctuidae) insects and cell line: PCR-RFLP of cytochrome oxidase c subunit i gene[J]. Fla Entomol, 2002, 85(1): 186-190. doi: 10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0186:SIOSFL]2.0.CO;2
      [10]
      NAGOSHI R N, MEAGHER R L, FLANDERS K, et al. Using haplotypes to monitor the migration of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) corn-strain populations from Texas and Florida[J]. J Econ Entomol, 2008, 101(3): 742-749. doi: 10.1093/jee/101.3.742
      [11]
      NAGOSHI R N, MEAGHER R L. Using intron sequence comparisons in the triose-phosphate isomerase gene to study the divergence of the fall armyworm host strains[J]. Insect Mol Biol, 2016, 25(3): 324-337. doi: 10.1111/imb.2016.25.issue-3
      [12]
      张磊, 靳明辉, 张丹丹, 等. 入侵云南草地贪夜蛾的分子鉴定[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(2): 19-24.
      [13]
      NAGOSHI R N, GOERGEN G, TOUNOU K A, et al. Analysis of strain distribution, migratory potential, and invasion history of fall armyworm populations in Northern Sub-Saharan Africa[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 3710. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21954-1
      [14]
      吴秋琳, 姜玉英, 吴孔明. 草地贪夜蛾缅甸虫源迁入中国的路径分析[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(2): 1-6.
      [15]
      NAGOSHI R N. Evidence that a major subpopulation of fall armyworm found in the Western Hemisphere is rare or absent in Africa, which may limit the range of crops at risk of infestation[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(4): e0208966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208966
      [16]
      吴秋琳, 姜玉英, 胡高, 等. 中国热带和南亚热带地区草地贪夜蛾春夏两季迁飞轨迹的分析[J]. 植物保护, 2019, 45(3): 1-9.
      [17]
      PAVINATO V A C, MARTINELLI S, DE LIMA P F, et al. Methodology microsatellite markers for genetic studies of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2013, 12(1): 370-380. doi: 10.4238/2013.February.8.1
      [18]
      do NASCIMENTO A R, FRESIA P, CÔNSOLI F L, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis of lufenuron-resistant and susceptible strains of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)[J]. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16(1): 985. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2183-z
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(30)

      1. 张捷,崔健,舒军,吴年隆,李梦晴,赵雄伟. 低磷胁迫下不同耐受型谷子的代谢组学差异. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2025(01): 144-155 .
      2. 王潇,王艺雄,季杭翔,施曼,王会来,宋新章,李全. 毛竹根际土壤磷组分对氮和生物炭添加的响应. 生态学杂志. 2025(04): 1135-1143 .
      3. 杜艺,周波,袁娜娜,姚佳妮,代金霞. 荒漠植物根际解磷细菌的筛选及抑菌和促生特性研究. 农业科学研究. 2024(01): 20-25 .
      4. 宋惠洁,吴艳,胡丹丹,胡志华,柳开楼,徐小林,张九兰. 不同磷肥用量下红壤区早稻季产量与田面水磷素动态变化. 中国土壤与肥料. 2024(02): 51-57 .
      5. 王敏,彭大榕,曾吉兴,王诗语,朱林星,郭世伟. 植物矿质营养与病害研究进展及展望. 植物营养与肥料学报. 2024(07): 1339-1353 .
      6. 李蒙,熊婷婷,朱思远,袁童瑶,张健,龚守富. 不同钾肥用量对甜瓜幼苗生长及基质特性的影响. 分子植物育种. 2024(18): 6120-6128 .
      7. 黄雨轩,游欣,张林平,吴斐,张扬,黄绍华. 根系分泌物提高土壤磷有效性研究概述. 林业科学研究. 2024(04): 193-203 .
      8. 安海涛,孙彩彩,董全民,杨晓霞,刘文亭,赵新全. 根系分泌物与植物—土壤间互作机制的研究进展. 青海畜牧兽医杂志. 2024(05): 50-59 .
      9. 薛迎斌,宋佳,李枭艺,李小豪,陈经烨,伍萍珍,朱胜男,刘颖. 大豆GmMADS4基因克隆、亚细胞定位及功能分析. 华南农业大学学报. 2023(03): 420-429 . 本站查看
      10. 孙志伟,徐月梅,许荣越,朱宽宇,杨建昌. 水稻低磷胁迫响应及其调控机制的研究进展. 核农学报. 2023(08): 1562-1570 .
      11. 刘瑀,陆超,焦点,刘宇馨,王国光. 低磷胁迫下翅碱蓬生长特性及脂肪酸含量的变化机制. 海洋科学. 2023(04): 117-125 .
      12. 吕铭滔,龚海光,黄永芳,龚勇军. 磷对铝胁迫油茶芽苗初生根保护酶的影响. 经济林研究. 2023(03): 271-277 .
      13. 陈浩婷,张玉静,刘洁,代泽敏,刘伟,石玉,张毅,李天来. 低磷胁迫下番茄转录因子WRKY6功能分析. 生物技术通报. 2023(10): 136-147 .
      14. 夏雪,蔡康锋,刘磊,宋秀娟,汪军妹,岳文浩. 大麦根形态和分子水平对低磷胁迫响应研究进展. 作物杂志. 2023(06): 11-16 .
      15. 田磊. 不同林龄泡桐根系分泌物对土壤酶活性和微生物的影响. 林业调查规划. 2022(01): 28-33 .
      16. 莫维维,韦建圩,梁嘉玲,刘易,谢伟东,任哲. 桂西北喀斯特地区漾濞泡核桃林地土壤与叶片养分化学计量特征. 经济林研究. 2022(01): 26-35 .
      17. 赵宽,万昕,邢德科,胡睿鑫,周葆华,袁可升. 低分子量有机酸对土壤有效磷及重金属释放影响的研究进展. 土壤通报. 2022(05): 1228-1236 .
      18. 蔡银美,赵庆霞,张成富. 低磷下植物根系分泌物对土壤磷转化的影响研究进展. 东北农业大学学报. 2021(02): 79-86 .
      19. 马庆华,贺淑霞,王伟南,曹晗,李贺. 磷供应水平对盆花月季‘仙境’生长和品质的影响. 北方园艺. 2021(11): 69-75 .
      20. 周梦岩,何冬梅,李亚超,刘静,马祥庆,李明. 紫色酸性磷酸酶在植物响应低磷胁迫中的作用研究进展. 分子植物育种. 2021(11): 3763-3770 .
      21. 惠乾龙,叶文彬,郭晋隆,袁照年,许莉萍. 植物磷匮乏下的根系、代谢和分子响应研究进展. 中国糖料. 2021(03): 34-42 .
      22. 靳琇,陈浩婷,石玉,白龙强,侯雷平,张毅. 柠檬酸浸种引发对低磷胁迫下番茄幼苗生长及生理特性的影响. 中国生态农业学报(中英文). 2021(07): 1159-1170 .
      23. 沈启维,李艳春,张健. 提高植物磷高效利用能力方法的研究进展. 绿色科技. 2021(11): 157-160 .
      24. 肖如武,黄楚龙,宗钊辉,王维,赵伟才,王军. 低磷胁迫对烤烟根系有机酸含量及土壤磷酸酶活性的影响. 广东农业科学. 2021(08): 74-82 .
      25. 忙顺兰,罗晓蔓,丁贵杰. 马尾松幼苗根系分泌物对土壤酶活性和养分的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2021(12): 53-59 .
      26. 丁艳,邢媛,任蒙莲. 低磷水稻根表铁膜形成对养分吸收的影响. 安徽科技学院学报. 2021(05): 47-52 .
      27. 武海燕,李喜焕,李文龙,孔佑宾,杜汇,张彩英. 大豆耐低磷性状鉴定及优异种质筛选. 河南农业科学. 2020(01): 61-67 .
      28. 张弛,孟琳钦,苏丹,仝则乾,胡祖庆. 麦蚜及植物病毒胁迫下小麦体内保护酶和解毒酶活性的变化. 麦类作物学报. 2020(03): 328-333 .
      29. 赵雄伟,吴年隆,乔佳辉,李旭凯,韩渊怀,邢国芳. 谷子酸性磷酸酶ACP家族基因鉴定与SiACP1耐低磷单倍型分析. 华北农学报. 2020(04): 35-45 .
      30. 王宇蕴,汤利. 多样性种植体系提高酸性红壤磷有效性的研究进展. 磷肥与复肥. 2020(09): 47-49 .

      Other cited types(35)

    Catalog

      Article views (1147) PDF downloads (1292) Cited by(65)

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return