Current advances on CRISPR/Cas genome editing technologies in plants

LIU Yaoguang; LI Gousi; ZHANG Yaling; CHEN Letian

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201905058

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2019 > 40(5): 38-49. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201905058

LIU Yaoguang, LI Gousi, ZHANG Yaling, et al. Current advances on CRISPR/Cas genome editing technologies in plants[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(5): 38-49. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201905058

Citation:

PDF (837 KB)

Current advances on CRISPR/Cas genome editing technologies in plants

State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources/College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

More Information

Received Date: May 04, 2019
Available Online: May 17, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Development of genome editing technologies provides efficient tools for functional genomics and crop molecular breeding. Owing to its simplicity and high efficiency, CRISPR/Cas systems, including CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cas12a, have been widely used for genome editing in many organisms. In this review, we summarize the recent advances on improvements and applications of CRISPR/Cas systems in plants, as well as the methods for analyzing targeted mutations in edited plants. Finally, we discuss current problems of CRISPR/Cas systems and give a prospect of genome editing technologies.
- CRISPR,
- plant,
- genome editing,
- targeted-mutation analysis

FullText(HTML)

References (125)

References

[1]	ZHANG Y, MA X, XIE X, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in plants [M]. Prog Mol Biol Transl, 2017, 149: 133-150.
[2]	李希陶, 刘耀光. 基因组编辑技术在水稻功能基因组和遗传改良中的应用[J]. 生命科学, 2016, 28(10): 1243-1249.
[3]	ISHINO Y, SHINAGAWA H, MAKINO K, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product[J]. J Bacteriol, 1987, 169(12): 5429-5433. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987
[4]	MOJICA F J, DIEZ-VILLASENOR C, SORIA E, et al. Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of archaea, bacteria and mitochondria[J]. Mol Microbiol, 2000, 36(1): 244-246. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x
[5]	MOJICA F J, FERRER C, JUEZ G, et al. Long stretches of short tandem repeats are present in the largest replicons of the archaea Haloferax mediterranei and Haloferax volcanii and could be involved in replicon partitioning[J]. Mol Microbiol, 1995, 17(1): 85-93. doi: 10.1111/mmi.1995.17.issue-1
[6]	JANSEN R, EMBDEN J D A V, GAASTRA W, et al. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes[J]. Mol Microbiol, 2002, 43(6): 1565-1575. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x
[7]	MOJICA F J M, DÍEZ-VILLASEÑOR C, GARCÍA-MARTÍNEZ J, et al. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements[J]. J Mol Evol, 2005, 60(2): 174-182. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3
[8]	POURCEL C, SALVIGNOL G, VERGNAUD G. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies[J]. Microbiology, 2005, 151(3): 653-663. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27437-0
[9]	BOLOTIN A, OUINQUIS B, SOROKIN A, et al. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin[J]. Microbiology, 2005, 151(8): 2551-2561. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0
[10]	BARRANGOU R, FREMAUX C, DEVEAU H, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5819): 1709-1712. doi: 10.1126/science.1138140
[11]	SOREK R, KUNIN V, HUGENHOLTZ P. CRISPR: A widespread system that provides acquired resistance against phages in bacteria and archaea[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2008, 6(3): 181-186. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1793
[12]	MARRAFFINI L A, SONTHEIMER E J. CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5909): 1843-1845. doi: 10.1126/science.1165771
[13]	DEVEAU H, BARRANGOU R, GARNEAU J E, et al. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus[J]. J Bacteriol, 2008, 190(4): 1390-1400. doi: 10.1128/JB.01412-07
[14]	GARNEAU J E, DUPUIS M E, VILLION M, et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA[J]. Nature, 2010, 468(7320): 67-71. doi: 10.1038/nature09523
[15]	JINEK M, CHYLINSKI K, FONFARA I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6096): 816-821. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829
[16]	GRISSA I, VERGNAUD G, POURCEL C. CRISPRFinder: A web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2007, 35(Web server issue): W52-W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm360
[17]	MAKAROVA K S, HAFT D H, BARRANGOU R, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2011, 9(6): 467-477. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2577
[18]	CONG L, RAN F A, COR D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 819-823. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143
[19]	MAKAROVA K S, KOONIN E V. Annotation and classification of CRISPR-Cas systems[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2015, 1311: 47-75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2687-9
[20]	SHMAKOV S, ABUDAYYEH O O, MAKAROVA K S, et al. Discovery and functional characterization of diverse class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems[J]. Mol Cell, 2015, 60(3): 385-397. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.008
[21]	GRATZ S J, CUMMINGS A M, NGUYEN J N, et al. Genome engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-Guided cas9 nuclease[J]. Genetics, 2013, 194(4): 1029-1035. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.152710
[22]	JINEK M, EAST A, CHENG A, et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells[J]. eLife, 2013, 2: e00471.
[23]	CHO S W, KIM S, KIM J M, et al. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(3): 230-232. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2507
[24]	HWANG W Y, FU Y, REYON D, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(3): 227-229. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2501
[25]	MALI P, YANG L, ESVELT K M, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 823-826. doi: 10.1126/science.1232033
[26]	FENG Z, ZHANG B, DING W, et al. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system[J]. Cell Res, 2013, 23(10): 1229-1232. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.114
[27]	MAO Y, ZHANG H, XU N, et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants[J]. Mol Plant, 2013, 6(6): 2008-2011. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst121
[28]	XIE K, YANG Y. RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Mol Plant, 2013, 6(6): 1975-1983. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst119
[29]	FU Y, FODEN J A, KHAYTER C, et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 822-826. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2623
[30]	SHAN Q, WANG Y, LI J, et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(8): 686-688. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2650
[31]	YIN K, GAO C, QIU J. Progress and prospects in plant genome editing[J]. Nat Plants, 2017, 3(8): 17107. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.107
[32]	LIU X, XIE C, SI H, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in plants[J]. Methods, 2017, 121/122: 94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.03.009
[33]	SOYARS C L, PETERSON B A, BURR C A, et al. Cutting edge genetics: CRISPR/Cas9 editing of plant genomes[J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2018, 59(8): 1608-1620. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy079
[34]	SONG G, JIA M, CHEN K, et al. CRISPR/Cas9: A powerful tool for crop genome editing[J]. Crop J, 2016, 4(2): 75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.12.002
[35]	SCHAEFFER S M, NAKATA P A. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: Transitioning from lab to field[J]. Plant Sci, 2015, 240: 130-142. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.011
[36]	ZETSCHE B, GOOTENBERG J S, ABUDAYYEH O O, et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Cell, 2015, 163(3): 759-771. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038
[37]	MAHFOUZ M M. Genome editing: The efficient tool CRISPR-Cpf1[J]. Nat Plants, 2017, 3: 17028. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.28
[38]	ZAIDI S S, MAHFOUZ M M, MANSOOR S. CRISPR-Cpf1: A new tool for plant genome editing[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2017, 22(7): 550-553. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.05.001
[39]	ENDO A, MASAFUMI M, KAYA H, et al. Efficient targeted mutagenesis of rice and tobacco genomes using Cpf1 from Francisella novicida[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 38169.
[40]	HU X, WANG C, LIU Q, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cpf1 system[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2017, 44(1): 71-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.12.001
[41]	WANG M, MAO Y, LU Y, et al. Multiplex gene editing in rice using the CRISPR-Cpf1 system[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(7): 1011-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.001
[42]	TANG X, LOWDER L G, ZHANG T, et al. A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants[J]. Nat Plants, 2017, 3: 17018.
[43]	XU R, QIN R, LI H, et al. Generation of targeted mutant rice using a CRISPR-Cpf1 system[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2017, 15(6): 713-717. doi: 10.1111/pbi.2017.15.issue-6
[44]	BEGEMANN M B, GRAY B N, JANUARY E, et al. Precise insertion and guided editing of higher plant genomes using Cpf1 CRISPR nucleases[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 11606.
[45]	LI S, ZHANG X, WANG W, et al. Expanding the scope of CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated genome editing in rice[J]. Mol Plant, 2018, 11(7): 995-998. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.03.009
[46]	MALZAHN A A, TANG X, LEE K, et al. Application of CRISPR-Cas12a temperature sensitivity for improved genome editing in rice, maize, and Arabidopsis[J]. BMC Biol, 2019, 17(1): 9.
[47]	KIM H, KIM S, RYU J, et al. CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated DNA-free plant genome editing[J]. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 14406. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14406
[48]	FENG Z, MAO Y, XU N, et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111(12): 4632-4637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400822111
[49]	MA X, ZHANG Q, ZHU Q, et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(8): 1274-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.007
[50]	马兴亮, 刘耀光. 植物CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑系统与突变分析[J]. 遗传, 2016(2): 118-125.
[51]	ANDERSSON M, TURESSON H, NICOLIA A, et al. Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplasts[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2017, 36(1): 117-128. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2062-3
[52]	ZHANG Y, LIANG Z, ZONG Y, et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 12617.
[53]	ZHOU H, LIU B, WEEKS D P, et al. Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014, 42(17): 10903-10914. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku806
[54]	ORDON J, GANTNER J, KEMNA J, et al. Generation of chromosomal deletions in dicotyledonous plants employing a user-friendly genome editing toolkit[J]. Plant J, 2017, 89(1): 155-168. doi: 10.1111/tpj.2017.89.issue-1
[55]	CHO S, YU S, PARK J, et al. Accession-dependent CBF gene deletion by CRISPR/Cas system in arabidopsis[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1910.
[56]	WANG F, WANG C, LIU P, et al. Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e154027.
[57]	ZHOU J, PENG Z, LONG J, et al. Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice[J]. Plant J, 2015, 82(4): 632-643. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12838
[58]	TANG L, MAO B, LI Y, et al. Knockout of OsNramp5 using the CRISPR/Cas9 system produces low Cd-accumulating indica rice without compromising yield[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 14438.
[59]	XIE Y, NIU B, LONG Y, et al. Suppression or knockout of SaF/SaM overcomes the Sa-mediated hybrid male sterility in rice[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2017, 59(9): 669-679. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12564
[60]	SHEN R, WANG L, LIU X, et al. Genomic structural variation-mediated allelic suppression causes hybrid male sterility in rice[J]. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 1310.
[61]	XIE Y, XU P, HUANG J, et al. Interspecific hybrid sterility in rice is mediated by OgTPR1 at the S1 locus encoding a peptidase-like protein[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(8): 1137-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.05.005
[62]	XIE Y, TANG J, XIE X, et al. An asymmetric allelic interaction drives allele transmission bias in interspecific rice hybrids[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 2501.
[63]	LI Q, ZHANG D, CHEN M, et al. Development of japonica photo-sensitive genic male sterile rice lines by editing carbon starved anther using CRISPR/Cas9[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2016, 43(6): 415-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.04.011
[64]	ZHOU H, HE M, LI J, et al. Development of commercial thermo-sensitive genic male sterile rice accelerates hybrid rice breeding using the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TMS5 editing system[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 37395.
[65]	LI X, ZHOU W, REN Y, et al. High-efficiency breeding of early-maturing rice cultivars via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2017, 44(3): 175-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2017.02.001
[66]	LI M, LI X, ZHOU Z, et al. Reassessment of the four yield-related genes Gn1a, DEP1, GS3, and IPA1 in rice using a CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 377.
[67]	SHEN L, HUA Y, FU Y, et al. Rapid generation of genetic diversity by multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in rice[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2017, 60(5): 506-515. doi: 10.1007/s11427-017-9008-8
[68]	XU R, YANG Y, QIN R, et al. Rapid improvement of grain weight via highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing in rice[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2016, 43(8): 529-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.07.003
[69]	SUN Y, JIAO G, LIU Z, et al. Generation of high-amylose rice through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of starch branching enzymes[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 298.
[70]	ZHANG J, ZHANG H, BOTELLA J R, et al. Generation of new glutinous rice by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the Waxy gene in elite rice varieties[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2018, 60(5): 369-375. doi: 10.1111/jipb.v60.5
[71]	SUN Y, ZHANG X, WU C, et al. Engineering herbicide-resistant rice plants through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination of acetolactate synthase[J]. Mol Plant, 2016, 9(4): 628-631. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.001
[72]	LI J, MENG X, ZONG Y, et al. Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR-Cas9[J]. Nat Plants, 2016, 2: 16139.
[73]	LI C, ZONG Y, WANG Y, et al. Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion[J]. Genome Biol, 2018, 19: 59.
[74]	LU Y, ZHU J. Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(3): 523-525. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.11.013
[75]	LUO M, GILBERT B, AYLIFFE M. Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for targeted mutagenesis, gene replacement and stacking of genes in higher plants[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2016, 35(7): 1439-1450. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1989-8
[76]	WANG M, LU Y, BOTELLA J R, et al. Gene targeting by homology-directed repair in rice using a geminivirus-based CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(7): 1007-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.002
[77]	MIKI D, ZHANG W, ZENG W, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation[J]. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 1967.
[78]	KOMOR A C, KIM Y B, PACKER M S, et al. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage[J]. Nature, 2016, 533(7603): 420-424. doi: 10.1038/nature17946
[79]	GAUDELLI N M, KOMOR A C, REES H A, et al. Programmable base editing of A·T to G·C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage[J]. Nature, 2017, 551(7681): 464-471. doi: 10.1038/nature24644
[80]	LI J, SUN Y, DU J, et al. Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(3): 526-529. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.001
[81]	SHIMATANI Z, KASHOJIYA S, TAKAYAMA M, et al. Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2017, 35(5): 441-443. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3833
[82]	ZONG Y, WANG Y, LI C, et al. Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2017, 35(5): 438-440. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3811
[83]	CHEN Y, WANG Z, NI H, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing system efficiently generates gain-of-function mutations in Arabidopsis[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2017, 60(5): 520-523. doi: 10.1007/s11427-017-9021-5
[84]	HUA K, TAO X, YUAN F, et al. Precise A·T to G·C base editing in the rice genome[J]. Mol Plant, 2018, 11(4): 627-630. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.007
[85]	YAN F, KUANG Y, REN B, et al. Highly efficient A·T to G·C base editing by Cas9n-guided tRNA adenosine deaminase in rice[J]. Mol Plant, 2018, 11(4): 631-634. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.008
[86]	KANG B, YUN J, KIM S, et al. Precision genome engineering through adenine base editing in plants[J]. Nat Plants, 2018, 4(7): 427-431. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0178-x
[87]	REN B, YAN F, KUANG Y, et al. Improved base editor for efficiently inducing genetic variations in rice with CRISPR/Cas9-guided hyperactive hAID mutant[J]. Mol Plant, 2018, 11(4): 623-626. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.01.005
[88]	LI X, XIE Y, ZHU Q, et al. Targeted genome editing in genes and cis-regulatory regions improves qualitative and quantitative traits in crops[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(11): 1368-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.10.009
[89]	RODRIGUEZ-LEAL D, LEMMON Z H, MAN J, et al. Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing[J]. Cell, 2017, 171(2): 470. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.030
[90]	PUCHTA H. Using CRISPR/Cas in three dimensions: Towards synthetic plant genomes, transcriptomes and epigenomes[J]. Plant J, 2016, 87(1): 5-15. doi: 10.1111/tpj.2016.87.issue-1
[91]	PIATEK A, ALI Z, BAAZIM H, et al. RNA-guided transcriptional regulation[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2015, 13(4): 578-589. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12284
[92]	LOWDER L G, ZHANG D, BALTES N J, et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation[J]. Plant Physiol, 2015, 169(2): 971-985. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00636
[93]	LI Z, ZHANG D, XIONG X, et al. A potent Cas9-derived gene activator for plant and mammalian cells[J]. Nat Plants, 2017, 3(12): 930-936. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0046-0
[94]	MA X, CHEN L, ZHU Q, et al. Rapid decoding of sequence-specific nuclease-induced heterozygous and biallelic mutations by direct sequencing of PCR products[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(8): 1285-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.02.012
[95]	LIU W, XIE X, MA X, et al. DSDecode: A web-based tool for decoding of sequencing chromatograms for genotyping of targeted mutations[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(9): 1431-1433. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.05.009
[96]	XIE X, MA X, ZHU Q, et al. CRISPR-GE: A convenient software toolkit for CRISPR-based genome editing[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(9): 1246-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.004
[97]	XUE L J, TSAI C J. AGEseq: Analysis of genome editing by sequencing[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(9): 1428-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.001
[98]	PARK J, LIM K, KIM J, et al. Cas-analyzer: An online tool for assessing genome editing results using NGS data[J]. Bioinformatics, 2017, 33(2): 286-288. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw561
[99]	GUELL M, YANG L, CHURCH G M. Genome editing assessment using CRISPR genome analyzer (CRISPR-GA)[J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(20): 2968-2970. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu427
[100]	PINELLO L, CANVER M C, HOBAN M D, et al. Analyzing CRISPR genome-editing experiments with CRISPResso[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2016, 34(7): 695-697. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3583
[101]	LIU Q, WANG C, JIAO X, et al. Hi-TOM: A platform for high-throughput tracking of mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas systems[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2019, 62(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9402-9
[102]	LLOYD A, PLAISIER C L, CARROLL D, et al. Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102(6): 2232-2237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409339102
[103]	VOYTAS D F. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases [M]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2013: 64, 327-350.
[104]	GUSCHIN D Y, WAITE A J, KATIBAH G E, et al. A rapid and general assay for monitoring endogenous gene modification [M]. Method Mol Biol, 2010, 649: 247-256.
[105]	ZHENG X, YANG S, ZHANG D, et al. Effective screen of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants in rice by single-strand conformation polymorphism[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2016, 35(7): 1545-1554. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1967-1
[106]	HSU P D, SCOTT D A, WEINSTEIN J A, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 827-832. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647
[107]	ANDERSON K R, HAEUSSLER M, WATANABE C, et al. CRISPR off-target analysis in genetically engineered rats and mice[J]. Nat Methods, 2018, 15(7): 512-514. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0011-5
[108]	ZHANG H, ZHANG J, WEI P, et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2014, 12(6): 797-807. doi: 10.1111/pbi.2014.12.issue-6
[109]	TANG X, LIU G, ZHOU J, et al. A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals highly specific genome editing by both Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) nucleases in rice[J]. Genome Biol, 2018, 19: 84.
[110]	NEKRASOV V, WANG C, WIN J, et al. Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 482.
[111]	LI J, MANGHWAR H, SUN L, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals rare off-target mutations and considerable inherent genetic or/and somaclonal variations in CRISPR/Cas9-edited cotton plants[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2019, 17(5): 858-868. doi: 10.1111/pbi.2019.17.issue-5
[112]	ZUO E, SUN Y, WEI W, et al. Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 289-292.
[113]	JIN S, ZONG Y, GAO Q, et al. Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 292-295.
[114]	FU Y, SANDER J D, REYON D, et al. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2014, 32(3): 279-284. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2808
[115]	CHO S W, KIM S, KIM Y, et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases[J]. Genome Res, 2014, 24(1): 132-141. doi: 10.1101/gr.162339.113
[116]	PATTANAYAK V, LIN S, GUILINGER J P, et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 839-843. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2673
[117]	ZHANG D, ZHANG H, LI T, et al. Perfectly matched 20-nucleotide guide RNA sequences enable robust genome editing using high-fidelity SpCas9 nucleases[J]. Genome Biol, 2017, 18: 191.
[118]	SVITASHEV S, SCHWARTZ C, LENDERTS B, et al. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 13274.
[119]	MIRCETIC J, STEINEBRUNNER I, DING L, et al. Purified Cas9 fusion proteins for advanced genome manipulation[J]. Small Methods, 2017, 1: 1600052. doi: 10.1002/smtd.v1.4
[120]	SLAYMAKER I M, GAO L, ZETSCHE B, et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity[J]. Science, 2015, 351(6268): 84-88.
[121]	KLEINSTIVER B P, PATTANAYAK V, PREW M S, et al. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects[J]. Nature, 2016, 529(7587): 490-495. doi: 10.1038/nature16526
[122]	TANG J, CHEN L, LIU Y. Off-target effects and the solution[J]. Nat Plants, 2019, 5(4): 341-342. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0406-z
[123]	AKCAKAYA P, BOBBIN M L, GUO J A, et al. In vivo CRISPR editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations[J]. Nature, 2018, 561: 416-419. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0500-9
[124]	WIENERT B, WYMAN S K, RICHARDSON C D, et al. Unbiased detection of CRISPR off-targets in vivo using DISCOVER-Seq[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 286.
[125]	JUN R, XIXUN H, KEJIAN W, et al. Development and application of CRISPR/Cas system in rice[J]. Rice Sci, 2019, 26(2): 69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2019.01.001

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(62)

1.	文博霖，万敏，胡建军，王克秀，景晟林，王心悦，朱博，唐铭霞，李兵，何卫，曾子贤. 马铃薯川芋50遗传转化及基因编辑体系的建立. 生物技术通报. 2025(04): 88-97 .
2.	林秋鹏，朱秀丽，马琳莎，姚鹏程. 引导编辑系统研究进展. 华南农业大学学报. 2024(02): 159-171 . 本站查看
3.	周千，沈月，王学涛，田永强. 基因编辑在植物育种领域中的应用进展研究. 智慧农业导刊. 2024(05): 65-69 .
4.	吴敏，黄娟，石桃雄，朱丽伟，邓娇，梁成刚，汪燕，刘飞，李荣，蔡芳，陈庆富. 应用CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术获得高直链淀粉水稻种质. 福建农业学报. 2024(01): 17-24 .
5.	胡丹玲，孙永伟. 病毒介导的植物基因组编辑技术研究进展. 植物学报. 2024(03): 452-462 .
6.	隆静，陈婧敏，刘霄，张一凡，周利斌，杜艳. 植物DNA双链断裂修复机制及其在重离子诱变和基因编辑中的作用. 生物技术通报. 2024(07): 55-67 .
7.	洪霞，陈孝赏，卢基来，屈为栋. 芋的基因组研究及其遗传多样性. 分子植物育种. 2024(19): 6330-6339 .
8.	陆地，胡春华，盛鸥，杨乔松，窦同心，何维弟，邓贵明，高慧君，刘思文，李春雨，董涛，易干军，毕方铖. 植物CRISPR/Cas无外源DNA基因组编辑技术研究进展. 园艺学报. 2024(08): 1927-1948 .
9.	张文宣，梁晓梅，戴成，文静，易斌，涂金星，沈金雄，傅廷栋，马朝芝. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术突变BnaMPK6基因降低甘蓝型油菜的耐盐性. 作物学报. 2023(02): 321-331 .
10.	李欣，刘旭霞，张文斐. 全球农业基因编辑技术监管动态及发展趋势. 生命科学. 2023(02): 114-122 .
11.	覃玉芬，廖山岳，郭新颖，周海，房耀宇，滕开冲，刘芳，覃宝祥，庄楚雄，李容柏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑系统创制新型水稻温敏雄性核不育系. 分子植物育种. 2023(05): 1551-1561 .
12.	宋思，徐杰，赵霞，周晶. 基因编辑技术在抗白粉病小麦育种中的研究进展. 粮食与油脂. 2023(03): 13-16 .
13.	闫强，胡亚群，薛冬，周琰琰，丁佩，韦雅雯，袁星星，陈新. 基于绿豆发状根的快速CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑方法. 江苏农业科学. 2023(10): 48-52 .
14.	高上，满淼淼，赵华，张丽娜，王加峰. 利用CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术创建水稻OsPUX2突变体. 安徽农业科学. 2023(09): 73-76 .
15.	谷玉娟，梁大安，郝天琪，高倩，刘磊. 缺失OSR结构域功能的GS3蛋白正向调控水稻籽粒大小. 植物遗传资源学报. 2023(04): 1133-1140 .
16.	马庆，付强，杨银，陈兰娅，陈海，代方霞，邹颉. 铁皮石斛分子生物学研究进展. 山地农业生物学报. 2023(04): 45-50 .
17.	彭歆，钱乾，谭健韬，彭波，甘玉立，王成睿，刘琦，沈梦圆. 水稻遗传育种相关生物信息数据库和工具的研究进展. 华南农业大学学报. 2023(06): 854-866 . 本站查看
18.	王兵，赵会纳，余婧，陈杰，骆梅，雷波. 利用CRISPR/Cas9系统研究REVOLUTA参与烟草叶芽发育的调控. 生物技术通报. 2023(10): 197-208 .
19.	娄红梅，杨庆玲，向小雪. 番茄MYB44基因敲除载体构建研究. 特种经济动植物. 2022(01): 19-22 .
20.	石育钦，孙梦丹，陈帆，成洪涛，胡学志，付丽，胡琼，梅德圣，李超. 通过CRISPR/Cas9技术突变BnMLO6基因提高甘蓝型油菜的抗病性. 作物学报. 2022(04): 801-811 .
21.	黄成，徐莹，张昊，刘雄伦，罗红兵. “金课”背景下“遗传学”课程建设的探索与思考. 教育教学论坛. 2022(03): 101-104 .
22.	蒋萌，付尚谭，王晓峰. CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑技术在番茄中的应用现状及展望. 西北植物学报. 2022(02): 348-360 .
23.	邓心安，王舒，曾海燕. 基因编辑食品监管与标识管理研究——基于认知度视角分析. 世界科技研究与发展. 2022(02): 210-221 .
24.	张慧博，孙超. CRISPR/Cas9技术在药用植物功能基因组研究中的应用和展望. 世界科学技术-中医药现代化. 2022(02): 638-648 .
25.	杨永昌，常帅，赵欣宇. CRISPR-Cas介导基因编辑技术的发展趋势及研究进展. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2022(06): 131-136 .
26.	李莹，段俊枝，邓俊锋. 典型农业科技期刊高被引论文分析——以入选综合性农业科学类中文核心期刊的16种高校学报为例. 科技传播. 2022(14): 29-36 .
27.	偶春，张敏，丁霖，姚侠妹，王泽璐，彭城，徐俊锋. CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术在植物中的应用与政策监管. 浙江农业学报. 2022(08): 1806-1814 .
28.	张金霞，刘骏，王士苗，董彦琪，张栩，彭东. CRISPR/Cas基因编辑技术及其在花生育种中的应用前景. 分子植物育种. 2022(15): 5011-5020 .
29.	魏雪珂，张大鹏，石鹏，李志瑛，王永. 基于CRISPR/Cas系统的热带作物基因编辑研究进展. 中国热带农业. 2022(05): 9-14 .
30.	张艳雯，杨晓祎，王慧慧，侯典云，张红晓，张卓妍，胥华伟. 应用CRISPR/Cas9技术研究水稻OsPIN10a基因功能. 植物生理学报. 2022(09): 1715-1723 .
31.	李凯强，王晶，肖伟，任红艳，华再东，董发明，毕延震. 缺失VIM基因大白猪肾成纤维细胞的构建及其NF-κB和MAPK信号通路的研究. 中国预防兽医学报. 2022(09): 970-976 .
32.	康志强，邓小大，袁永强，蔡书静，郑礼军，赵利锋，叶雯华，王燕，王新荣. 基于CRISPR/Cas9系统的番茄LeMYB330突变体制作及突变位点分析. 分子植物育种. 2022(23): 7785-7795 .
33.	陈娜，邵勤，李晓鹏，高阳，卢其能. 马铃薯野生种SpSBP1基因的克隆及CRISPR/Cas9载体构建. 华北农学报. 2022(06): 23-33 .
34.	侯应霞，韦文俊，陈浩，顾艳，龚丝雨. CRISPR/Cas9技术在农作物育种中的应用. 湖北农业科学. 2022(S1): 4-10 .
35.	程伟，刘昆霖，何水林，廖玉才. 基于高校学生认知度的转基因科普及产业化的思考和建议. 农业生物技术学报. 2021(01): 137-145 .
36.	刘肖静，王旭静，王志兴. CRISPR-Cas系统在植物中的研究进展与监管政策. 生物技术进展. 2021(01): 1-8 .
37.	杨雪，孙雅佩，王政博，于茹恩，李雪萍，李红英. CRISPR/Cas9介导靶向敲除拟南芥REVOLUTA基因突变体的鉴定. 分子植物育种. 2021(03): 867-873 .
38.	张洪文，赵圣博，闫晓红，李俊，翟杉杉，肖芳，高鸿飞，李允静，吴刚，武玉花. 一种基因编辑位点特异性PCR方法的开发和应用. 中国油料作物学报. 2021(01): 77-89 .
39.	张旺，冼俊霖，孙超，王春明，石丽，于为常. CRISPR/Cas9编辑花生FAD2基因研究. 作物学报. 2021(08): 1481-1490 .
40.	潘志文，张旭冬，高洁儿，刘鹏程，姚涓，张秀杰，姜大刚. 基因组编辑植物的监管与检测技术. 科技导报. 2021(09): 87-92 .
41.	王潇然，孟凡荣，李会强，金维环，李涛，崔晓娜，石永春，王小纯. 基于“互联网+”的生物化学课程建设与探索. 河南教育学院学报(自然科学版). 2021(02): 54-57 .
42.	王梦雨，王颢潜，王旭静，王志兴. 基因编辑产品检测技术研究进展. 生物技术进展. 2021(04): 438-445 .
43.	李凯强，李琦，姚杰，任红艳，董发明，毕延震. CRISPR-Cas技术用于核酸检测的现状和前景. 中国预防兽医学报. 2021(07): 791-795 .
44.	罗丽婷，蒋君梅，李向阳，谢鑫. CRISPR技术在改良植物抗病性中的应用. 山地农业生物学报. 2021(04): 46-57 .
45.	王洁，吴怀通. CRISPR/Cas9系统介导的基因编辑文库筛选在植物中的应用. 分子植物育种. 2021(18): 6051-6058 .
46.	吴世洋，杨晓祎，张艳雯，侯典云，胥华伟. 利用CRISPR/Cas9基因编辑技术构建水稻ospin9突变体. 中国农业科学. 2021(18): 3805-3817 .
47.	谭晓菁，王忠华，吴月燕，郑二松，徐如梦，陈剑平，王栩鸣，严成其. 基因编辑技术在水稻抗病基因与育种研究中的应用进展. 浙江农业学报. 2021(10): 1982-1990 .
48.	张伟梅，张古文，冯志娟，刘娜，王斌，卜远鹏. 菜用大豆籽粒中蔗糖的遗传与调控机制研究进展. 浙江农业学报. 2021(12): 2446-2456 .
49.	黄锦，李勇，于翠，朱志贤，莫荣利，董朝霞，胡兴明，邓文. 基因编辑技术及其在桑树育种中的应用前景展望. 湖北农业科学. 2021(23): 8-14 .
50.	冷燕，孙康泰，刘倩倩，蒲阿庆，李翔，万向元，魏珣. 全球基因编辑作物监管趋势研究. 中国生物工程杂志. 2021(12): 24-29 .
51.	王超凡，张大健. 基因编辑技术在大豆种质资源研究中的利用. 植物遗传资源学报. 2020(01): 26-32 .
52.	陈玉冲，温国泉，蒋显斌. 华南稻区近20年水稻品种审定与保护现状分析. 中国种业. 2020(04): 46-52 .
53.	薛永国，刘鑫磊，唐晓飞，曹旦，栾晓燕. CRISPR-Cas9技术在作物中研究进展. 黑龙江农业科学. 2020(02): 125-130 .
54.	李志亮，黄丛林，刘晓彬，邢浩春，吴忠义. 转基因植物及其安全性的研究进展. 北方园艺. 2020(08): 129-135 .
55.	王一博，赫兆辉. 基因编辑技术在植物育种工作中的应用. 种子科技. 2020(11): 108+110 .
56.	陈赢男，陆静. CRISPR/Cas9系统在林木基因编辑中的应用. 遗传. 2020(07): 657-668 .
57.	朱奕骋. CRISPR/Cas9技术的研究进展及其在肺癌研究中的应用. 科技传播. 2020(14): 172-174 .
58.	王慧媛，刘晓，薛淮，赵剑峰，熊燕. 完善安全管理, 促进基因编辑作物的科技与产业发展. 植物生理学报. 2020(11): 2317-2328 .
59.	潘志文，高洁儿，陈伟庭，周峰，姚涓，姜大刚. 基因组编辑技术在植物中的应用研究进展. 贵州农业科学. 2020(12): 16-20 .
60.	He Rui，Cao Qin，Chen Jiejun，Tian Jinqiang. Perspectivesonthemanagementofsyntheticbiologicalandgeneeditedfoods. 生物安全与健康（英文）. 2020(04): 193-198 .
61.	律文堂，尹静静，阴筱，徐国鑫，吴小宾，李效尊，吴修. PARMS在水稻基因编辑后代基因分型中的应用研究. 山东农业科学. 2019(10): 8-13 .
62.	Gousi Li，Yao-Guang Liu，Yuanling Chen. Genome-editing technologies: the gap between application and policy. Science China(Life Sciences). 2019(11): 1534-1538 .

Other cited types(90)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (3954) PDF downloads (5507) Cited by(152)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Current advances on CRISPR/Cas genome editing technologies in plants

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(62)

Other cited types(90)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content