YU Chengpeng, HU Ronghua, LIN Peijiong, et al. Sensitivity of four phages to host bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum and analysis of their receptors[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2020, 41(2): 82-87. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201903022
    Citation: YU Chengpeng, HU Ronghua, LIN Peijiong, et al. Sensitivity of four phages to host bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum and analysis of their receptors[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2020, 41(2): 82-87. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201903022

    Sensitivity of four phages to host bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum and analysis of their receptors

    More Information
    • Received Date: April 15, 2019
    • Available Online: May 17, 2023
    • Objective 

      To investigate the lysis abilities of different phages mixtures against Ralstonia solanacearum, study their effects on the generation of phage-resistant strains, and clarify the receptors of four types of phages.

      Method 

      Four types of phages, including P1556-1, P1556-2, P7-1 and P1521, were mixed in pairs. The sizes of plaques on R. solanacearum plates were determined. The resistance of R. solanacearum to phages was measured by co-culture of R. solanacearum and phages. Adsorption tests using phages, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and membrane protein were conducted to determine the receptors of phages.

      Result 

      Phage P1556-1 produced the largest plaque, indicating a strong lytic ability against R. solanacearum. The plaque sizes from the mixtures of two types of phages did not significantly differ from those of individual phages, while mixing two types of phages could slow down the generation of phage-resistant strains. Phage P1556-2 could be adsorbed by LPS of R. solanacearum, phage P1521 could be adsorbed by both LPS and membrane protein, while phage P1556-1 and P7-1 could be adsorbed by neither LPS nor membrane protein.

      Conclusion 

      Mixing different phages can not improve the lysis ability against R. solanacearum, but can delay the generation of resistant host strain. The receptors of different phages are different.

    • [1]
      RAHMANI R, ZARRINI G, SHEIKHZADEH F, et al. Effective phages as green antimicrobial agents against antibiotic-resistant hospital Escherichia coli[J]. Jundishapur J Microbiol, 2015, 8(2): e17744.
      [2]
      SARKER S A, SULTANA S, REUTELER G, et al. Oral phage therapy of acute bacterial diarrhea with two coliphage preparations: A randomized trial in children from Bangladesh[J]. Ebiomedicine, 2016, 4: 124-137.
      [3]
      WALL S, ZHANG J, ROSTAGNO M, et al. Phage therapy to reduce preprocessing Salmonella infections in market-weight swine[J]. Appl Environ Microb, 2010, 76(1): 48-53. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00785-09
      [4]
      WANG Y, BARTON M, ELLIOTT L, et al. Bacteriophage therapy for the control of Vibrio harveyi in greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata)[J]. Aquaculture, 2017, 473: 251-258. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.01.003
      [5]
      SUSIANTO G, FARID M M, DHANY N R, et al. Host range for bacteriophages that infect bacterial blight pathogen on soybean[J]. Proc Environ Sci, 2014, 20: 760-766. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.091
      [6]
      FLAHERTY J E, JONES J B, HARBAUGH B K, et al. Control of bacterial spot on tomato in the greenhouse and field with H-mutant bacteriophages[J]. Hortscience, 2000, 35(5): 882-884. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.35.5.882
      [7]
      FLAHERTY J E, HARBAUGH B K, JONES J B, et al. H-mutant bacteriophages as a potential biocontrol of bacterial blight of geranium[J]. Hortscience, 2001, 36(1): 98-100. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.36.1.98
      [8]
      BALOGH B, CANTEROS B I, STALL R E, et al. Control of citrus canker and citrus bacterial spot with bacteriophages[J]. Plant Dis, 2008, 92(7): 1048-1052. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-92-7-1048
      [9]
      SCHNABEL E L, FERNANDO W G D, MEYER M P, et al. Bacteriophage of Erwinia amylovora and their potential for biocontrol[J]. Acta Hortic, 1999, 489(489): 649-654.
      [10]
      RAVENSDALE M, BLOM T J, GRACIAl-GARZA J A, et al. Bacteriophages and the control of Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora[J]. Can J Plant Pathol, 2007, 29(2): 121-130. doi: 10.1080/07060660709507448
      [11]
      ADDY H S, ASKORA A, KAWASAKI T, et al. Loss of virulence of the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum through infection by φRSM filamentous phages[J]. Phytopathology, 2012, 102(5): 469. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-11-0319-R
      [12]
      ADDY H S, ASKORA A, KAWASAKI T, et al. Utilization of filamentous phage phi RSM3 to control bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum[J]. Plant Dis, 2012, 96(8): 1204-1209. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-11-1023-RE
      [13]
      FUJIWARA A, FUJISAWA M, HAMASAKI R, et al. Biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum by treatment with lytic bacteriophages[J]. Appl Environ Microb, 2011, 77(12): 4155-4162.
      [14]
      康洁. 3种方法提取大肠杆菌E.coli脂多糖的比较[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(21): 12-15.
      [15]
      余成鹏, 胡蓉花, 陈小强, 等. 江西和广东烟草青枯菌对噬菌体的敏感性及聚类分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018(4): 699-707.
      [16]
      WEI C H, LIU J L, MAINA A N, et al. Developing a bacteriophage cocktail for biocontrol of potato bacterial wilt[J]. Virol Sin, 2017, 32(6): 476-484.
      [17]
      BAE J Y, WU J, LEE H J, et al. Biocontrol potential of a lytic bacteriophage PE204 against bacterial wilt of tomato[J]. J Microbiol Biotechn, 2012, 22(12): 1613-1620. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1208.08072
      [18]
      MARRAFFINI L A. CRISPR-Cas immunity against phages: Its effects on the evolution and survival of bacterial pathogens[J]. PLoS Pathog, 2013, 9(12): e1003765. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003765
      [19]
      BARRANGOU R, FREMAUX C, DEVEAU H, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5819): 1709. doi: 10.1126/science.1138140
      [20]
      HYNES A P, VILLION M, MOINEAU S. Adaptation in bacterial CRISPR-Cas immunity can be driven by defective phages[J]. Nat Commun, 2014, 5: 4399. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5399
      [21]
      WEI Y, CHESNE M T, TERNS R M, et al. Sequences spanning the leader-repeat junction mediate CRISPR adaptation to phage in Streptococcus thermophilus[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015, 43(3): 1749-1758. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1407
      [22]
      SORENSEN M C H, van ALPHEN L B, HARBOE A, et al. Bacteriophage F336 recognizes the capsular phosphoramidate modification of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168[J]. J Bacteriol, 2011, 193(23): 6742-6749. doi: 10.1128/JB.05276-11
      [23]
      ZALESKI P. The role of Dam methylation in phase variation of Haemophilus influenzae genes involved in defence against phage infection[J]. Microbiology, 2005, 151(10): 3361-3369. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28184-0
      [24]
      KIM M, RYU S. Characterization of a T5-Like coliphage, SPC35, and differential development of resistance to SPC35 in Salmonella enteric serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli[J]. Appl Environ Microb, 2011, 77(6): 2042-2050. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02504-10
      [25]
      毛普加, 洪愉, 毛小萍, 等. 噬菌体受体及其鉴定方法[J]. 中国微生态学杂志, 2014(6): 731-734.
      [26]
      BAE H, CHO Y. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa podophage MPK7, which requires type IV pili for infection[J]. Genome Announc, 2013, 1(5): e00744-13.
      [27]
      NARULITA E, ADDY H S, KAWASAKI T, et al. The involvement of the PilQ secretin of type IV pili in phage infection in Ralstonia solanacearum[J]. Biochem Bioph Res Co, 2016, 469(4): 868-872. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.071
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(11)

      1. 李欣宇,叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉,王娟,张新娜,张春雨,赵秀海. 基于非线性混合效应模型的东北红松树高-胸径关系. 北京林业大学学报. 2025(03): 38-48 .
      2. 程雯,武晓昱,叶尔江·拜克吐尔汉,王娟,赵秀海,张春雨. 基于混合效应和分位数回归的温带针阔混交林树高与胸径关系研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2024(02): 28-39 .
      3. 王维芳,崔梦琦,邢凯然. 包含哑变量的大兴安岭天然白桦林碳密度模型. 森林工程. 2024(05): 74-81 .
      4. 吕乐乐,王文彬,董灵波. 基于哑变量和分位数回归的兴安落叶松更新幼树的树高-胸径模型. 应用生态学报. 2023(09): 2355-2362 .
      5. 夏洪涛,郭晓斌,张珍,田相林,郭福涛,孙帅超. 基于不同立地质量评价指标的杉木大径材林分树高-胸径模型. 中南林业科技大学学报. 2023(10): 80-88 .
      6. 郭卫红,郑庆荣,胡砚秋,陈晓江,李眉红. 山西五台山主要针叶树种树高—胸径曲线模型研究. 湖南林业科技. 2022(06): 72-77 .
      7. 王泳腾,黄治昊,王俊,张童,郎立华,孙国明,崔国发. 濒危植物黄檗的生存压力研究. 北京林业大学学报. 2021(01): 49-57 .
      8. 陈浩,罗扬. 马尾松树高-胸径非线性混合效应模型构建. 森林与环境学报. 2021(04): 439-448 .
      9. 张冬燕,王冬至,李晓,高雨珊,李天宇,陈静. 基于分位数回归的针阔混交林树高与胸径的关系. 浙江农林大学学报. 2020(03): 424-431 .
      10. 邓楠,马丰丰,宋庆安,周满,杨蕊,李典军,彭湃,田育新. 环境梯度对杉木公益纯林分布特征及生长的影响. 湖南林业科技. 2020(04): 8-15 .
      11. 韩辉,袁春良,张学利,宋鸽,安宇宁,孙晓辉. 基于林分生长量的沙地樟子松初植造林密度确定. 辽宁林业科技. 2020(06): 1-9+58 .

      Other cited types(5)

    Catalog

      Article views (2180) PDF downloads (2634) Cited by(16)

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return