• Chinese Core Journal
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source journal
  • Journal of Citation Report of Chinese S&T Journals (Core Edition)
WANG Guangyao, LI Xue, ZHOU Changyan, et al. Effects of different ratios of Pholiota nameko residue to pig manure on compost humus composition[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(6): 111-117. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201812020
Citation: WANG Guangyao, LI Xue, ZHOU Changyan, et al. Effects of different ratios of Pholiota nameko residue to pig manure on compost humus composition[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(6): 111-117. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201812020

Effects of different ratios of Pholiota nameko residue to pig manure on compost humus composition

More Information
  • Received Date: December 19, 2018
  • Available Online: May 17, 2023
  • Objective 

    To explore the effects of different fertilization ratios on compost humus composition.

    Method 

    Pholiota nameko residue was selected as the basic material. Different proportions of pig manure were added to analyze humus structure, and screen the best ratio of P. nameko residue to pig manure while composting organic fertilizer.

    Result 

    In the compost with different ratios of P. nameko residue to pig manure, the contents of water soluble organic matter and humic acid carbon all decreased firstly and then increased slowly as the composting process continued. The ratios of humic acid to fulvic acid (CHA/ CFA) all decreased significantly on the 15th day, and then increased. CHA/CFA in treatment Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ(the mass ratios of P. nameko residue to pig manure were 0︰10, 1︰9, 3︰7, 5︰5 and 7︰3) were significantly higher than the initial values, being 7.14, 3.23, 1.22, 4.38 and 2.52 times of the initial values respectively. CHA/ CFA in treatment Ⅳ was the best level. Meanwhile, the carbon content of humin in treatment Ⅳ was higher than those in other treatments.

    Conclusion 

    In compost with different proportions of P. nameko residue and pig manure, the organic carbon contents are more beneficial, and the humus composition contents and soil fertility are improved, as compared with using P. nameko residue or pig manure alone. Under the appropriate proportions of P. nameko residue and pig manure, the polymerization and humification degrees of soil humus improve with the increase of CHA/CFA. Organic material can improve the humus content of each combination form and the structure of soil organic matter, and the effect is better than other treatments when the ratio of P. nameko residue to pig manure is 5︰5.

  • [1]
    李恕艳, 李吉进, 张邦喜, 等. 菌剂对鸡粪堆肥腐殖质含量品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(S2): 268-274.
    [2]
    WANG X Q, CUI H Y, SHI J H, et al. Relationship between bacterial diversity and environmental parameters during composting of different raw materials[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2015, 198: 395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.041
    [3]
    曹晓晓, 和苗苗. 好氧堆肥过程中碳素损失及其控制技术研究进展[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 13(4): 396-401. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-232X.2014.04.013
    [4]
    索超. 猪粪堆肥过程中腐殖质的生成及其对Cu的吸附作用研究[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2009.
    [5]
    XI B D, ZHAO X Y, HE X S, et al. Successions and diversity of humic-reducing microorganisms and their association with physical-chemical parameters during composting[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2016, 219: 204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.120
    [6]
    ZHAO X Y, HE X S, XI B D, et al. The evolution of water extractable organic matter and its association with microbial community dynamics during municipal solid waste composting[J]. Waste Manage, 2016, 56: 79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.018
    [7]
    姜继韶, 黄懿梅, 黄华, 等. 猪粪秸秆高温堆肥过程中碳氮转化特征与堆肥周期探讨[J]. 环境科学学报, 2011, 31(11): 2511-2517.
    [8]
    李国学, 李玉春, 李彦富. 固体废物堆肥化及堆肥添加剂研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2003(2): 252-256. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2003.02.034
    [9]
    王玉军, 窦森, 张晋京, 等. 农业废弃物堆肥过程中腐殖质组成变化[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2009, 37(8): 79-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2009.08.029
    [10]
    屠巧萍. 生物质炭添加对猪粪堆肥腐殖化的影响及机理研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
    [11]
    孙向平. 不同控制条件下堆肥过程中腐殖质的转化机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2013.
    [12]
    ZHANG J M, WANG J K, AN T T, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil humic acid composition and structure in Black Soil[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(11): e0186918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186918
    [13]
    SÁNCHEZ-MONEDERO M, ROIG A, CEGARRA J, et al. Relationships between water-soluble carbohydrate and phenol fractions and the humification indices of different organic wastes during composting[J]. Bioresour Technol, 1999, 70(2): 193-201. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00018-8
    [14]
    SHI M, WEI Z, WANG L, et al. Response of humic acid formation to elevated nitrate during chicken manure composting[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2018, 258: 390-394. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.056
    [15]
    AMBROSOLI R, PETRUZZELLI L, MINATI J L, et al. Anaerobic PAH degradation in soil by a mixed bacterial consortium under denitrifying conditions[J]. Chemosphere, 2005, 60(9): 1231-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.030
    [16]
    JOURAIPHY A, AMIR S, EL GHAROUS M, et al. Chemical and spectroscopic analysis of organic matter transformation during composting of sewage sludge and green plant waste[J]. Int Biodeter Biodegr, 2005, 56(2): 101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.06.002
    [17]
    王利娟, 谢利娟, 杨桂军, 等. 不同填充剂及复合微生物菌剂对蓝藻堆肥效果的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2009, 3(12): 2261-2265.
    [18]
    WU J Q, ZHAO Y, QI H S, et al. Identifying the key factors that affect the formation of humic substance during different materials composting[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 244: 1193-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.100
    [19]
    SANCHEZ-MONEDERO M A, CEGARRA J, GARCIA D, et al. Chemical and structural evolution of humic acids during organic waste composting[J]. Biodegradation, 2002, 13(6): 361-371. doi: 10.1023/A:1022888231982
    [20]
    鲍艳宇, 颜丽, 娄翼来, 等. 鸡粪堆肥过程中各种碳有机化合物及腐熟度指标的变化[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2005(4): 820-824. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2005.04.046
    [21]
    WEN B, ZHANG J J, ZHANG S Z, et al. Phenanthrene sorption to soil humic acid and different humin fractions[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2007, 41(9): 3165-3171. doi: 10.1021/es062262s
    [22]
    牟克珺. 不同调理剂及堆制条件对猪粪堆肥理化指标的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2008.
    [23]
    唐璐. 不同堆肥条件对堆肥过程中碳素损失及腐殖质形成的影响研究[D]. 杭州: 杭州师范大学, 2016.
    [24]
    ADHIKARI B K, BARRINGTON S, MARTINEZ J, et al. Effectiveness of three bulking agents for food waste composting[J]. Waste Manage, 2009, 29(1): 197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.001
    [25]
    ZHAO Y, WEI Y Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Roles of composts in soil based on the assessment of humification degree of fulvic acids[J]. Ecol Indic, 2017, 72: 473-480. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.051
    [26]
    王悦, 张润, 刘莎. 猪粪和玉米秸秆的不同配方比对厌氧发酵产沼气的影响[J]. 现代农村科技, 2018(3): 69-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5329.2018.03.063
    [27]
    江滔, 李国学, 唐琼, 等. 腐熟堆肥筛上粗颗粒对堆肥化过程中温室气体排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(7): 1363-1370. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2015.07.019
    [28]
    张雪英, 张宇峰. 污泥堆肥前后水溶性有机物的性质变化研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008(4): 1667-1671. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2008.04.068
    [29]
    黄国锋, 钟流举, 张振钿, 等. 有机固体废弃物堆肥的物质变化及腐熟度评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003(5): 813-818. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2003.05.037
    [30]
    CANARUTTO S, PETRUZZELLI G, LUBRANO L, et al. How composting affects heavy metal content[J]. Bio Cycle(United States), 1991, 32(6): 48-50.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 李轩宇,郑天尧,王越. 基于深度学习的视频信号降噪技术研究. 电视技术. 2025(01): 220-222 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (1645) PDF downloads (1278) Cited by(1)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return