Differences of soil cadmium accumulation and translocation in different maize varieties

DENG Ting; LU Weisheng; WU Jialong; ZHAO Yu; ZHAO Yang; YAO Yuanmeng; LI Guijie

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201808045

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2019 > 40(4): 33-39. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201808045

DENG Ting, LU Weisheng, WU Jialong, et al. Differences of soil cadmium accumulation and translocation in different maize varieties[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(4): 33-39. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201808045

Citation:

PDF (970 KB)

Differences of soil cadmium accumulation and translocation in different maize varieties

1.
College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2.
Guangdong Jingdi Planning Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510630, China

More Information

Received Date: August 23, 2018
Available Online: May 17, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
A pot experiment was conducted to study Cd accumulation and translocation capacities of 11 maize (Zea Mays) varieties and to screen these varieties, so as to provide a theoretical basis for discovering maize varieties with high Cd accumulation.

Method
Eleven maize varieties were cultured in soil with 2.5 mg·kg⁻¹ Cd for 50 d. The dry biomass and Cd content were measured. We used variance analysis and principal component analysis to study the differences in dry biomass, Cd accumulation and translocation capacities of 11 maize varieties.

Result
There were significant differences in the dry biomass of root and shoot, Cd content, Cd accumulation coefficient and translocation coefficient among 11 maize varieties (P<0.05). The Cd contents of Huacainuo 3 and Guanghongnuo 8 shoots were 26.66 and 20.25 mg·kg⁻¹ respectively, accumulation coefficients were 10.66 and 8.10 respectively, and translocation coefficients were 1.46 and 2.16 respectively, which were significantly higher than those of other varieties (P<0.05). Principal component analysis showed that the Cd accumulation and translocation capacities of Huacainuo 3 and Guanghongnuo 8 were stronger compared with other varieties (P<0.01).

Conclusion
Huacainuo 3 and Guanghongnuo 8 have relatively high capacity in Cd accumulation and translocation, and belong to the varieties with high Cd accumulation. They have great potential to remediate to Cd contaminated soil.
- maize,
- soil,
- cadmium accumulation,
- translocation,
- variety screening

FullText(HTML)

References (26)

References

[1]	环境保护部, 国土资源部. 全国土壤污染状况调查公报[EB/OL].(2014-04-17)[2018-08-10]. http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/qt/201404/t20140417_270670.htm.
[2]	WANG M, ZOU J, DUAN X, et al. Cadmium accumulation and its effects on metal uptake in maize (Zea mays L.)[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2007, 98(1): 82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.11.028
[3]	邢艳帅, 乔冬梅, 朱桂芬, 等. 土壤重金属污染植物修复技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(17): 208-214. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2867
[4]	刘小梅, 吴启堂, 李秉滔. 超富集植物治理重金属污染土壤研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2003, 22(5): 636-640. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2003.05.032
[5]	屈冉, 孟伟, 李俊生, 等. 土壤重金属污染的植物修复[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(4): 626-631.
[6]	EIJSACHERS H J P, HAMERS T. Intergrates soil and sediment research: A basis for proper protection[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993:673-676.
[7]	KUMAR N P B A, DUSHENKOV V, MOTTO H, et al. Phytoextraction: The use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 1995, 29(5): 1232-1238.
[8]	YANG X E, LONG X X, YE H B, et al. Cadmium tolerance and hyper-accumulation in a new Zn-hyperaccumulating plant species (Sedum alfredii Hance)[J]. Plant Soil, 2004, 259(1/2): 181-189.
[9]	刘威, 束文圣, 蓝崇钰. 宝山堇菜(Viola baoshanensis)一种新的镉超富集植物[J]. 科学通报, 2003, 48(19): 2046-2049. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2003.19.009
[10]	魏树和, 周启星, 王新, 等. 一种新发现的镉超积累植物龙葵(Solanum nigrum L.)[J]. 科学通报, 2004, 49(23): 2568-2573.
[11]	FÄSSLER E, ROBINSON B H, GUPTA S K, et al. Uptake and allocation of plant nutrients and Cd in maize, sunflower and tobacco growing on contaminated soil and the effect of soil conditioners under field conditions[J]. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys, 2010, 87(3): 339-352. doi: 10.1007/s10705-009-9342-z
[12]	陈建军, 于蔚, 祖艳群, 等. 玉米(Zea mays)对镉积累与转运的品种差异研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(10): 1671-1676. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2014.10.016
[13]	祁剑英, 杜天庆, 郝建平, 等. 能源作物甜高粱和玉米对土壤重金属的富集比较[J]. 玉米科学, 2017, 25(6): 73-78.
[14]	辛艳卫, 梁成华, 杜立宇, 等. 不同玉米品种对镉的富集和转运特性[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(5): 839-846.
[15]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 495.
[16]	中华人民共和国卫生部. 食品中镉的测定: GB/T 5009.15—2003[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003: 112-117.
[17]	THIOULOUSE J, CHESSEL D, DOLÉDEC S, et al. ADE–4: A multivariate analysis and graphical display software[J]. Stat Comput, 1997, 7(1): 75-83. doi: 10.1023/A:1018513530268
[18]	LIU D H, JIAN W H, LIU C J, et al. Uptake and accumulation of lead by roots, hypocotyls and shoots of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)][J]. Bioresour Technol, 2000, 71(3): 273-277. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00082-6
[19]	孙洪欣, 赵全利, 薛培英, 等. 不同夏玉米品种对镉、铅积累与转运的差异性田间研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(12): 2068-2074.
[20]	GRANT C A, CLARKE J M, DUGUID S, et al. Selection and breeding of plant cultivars to minimize cadmium accumulation[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2008, 390: 301-310.
[21]	刘维涛, 周启星. 重金属污染预防品种的筛选与培育[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(6): 1452-1458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.06.035
[22]	孙姣辉, 陈婷婷, 邱博, 等. 几种重金属(Cd、Cr、As) 在玉米植株中的分布研究[J]. 作物研究, 2016, 30(4): 402-405.
[23]	文秋红, 于丽华. 玉米自交系富集镉能力和最佳收获时期[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(12): 4066-4070. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.12.020
[24]	徐稳定. 超甜38玉米对镉的耐受机理及强化富集研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2014.
[25]	MÅTHÉ-GÅSPÅR G, ANTON A. Phytoremediation study: Factors influencing heavy metal uptake of plants[J]. Acta Biol Szegediensis, 2005, 49(1/2): 69-70.
[26]	袁林, 刘颖, 兰玉书, 等. 不同玉米品种对镉吸收累积特性研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2018, 36(1): 22-27.

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1064) PDF downloads (1121)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Differences of soil cadmium accumulation and translocation in different maize varieties

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content