Effects of sugarcane-mungbean intercropping, bean straw returning and nitrogen application level on sugarcane traits

SU Lirong; HE Tieguang; SU Tianming; LI Qin; QIN Fang; LI Yangrui

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201807029

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2019 > 40(3): 20-28. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201807029

SU Lirong, HE Tieguang, SU Tianming, et al. Effects of sugarcane-mungbean intercropping, bean straw returning and nitrogen application level on sugarcane traits[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(3): 20-28. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201807029

Citation:

PDF (896 KB)

Effects of sugarcane-mungbean intercropping, bean straw returning and nitrogen application level on sugarcane traits

SU Lirong^{1, 2,},
HE Tieguang²,
SU Tianming²,
LI Qin²,
QIN Fang²,
LI Yangrui^{1, 3, ,}

1.
College of Agriculture, Guangxi University/State Key Laboratory for Subtropical Agri-Bioresources Conservation and Utilization, Nanning 530004, China
2.
Agricultural Resources and Environmental Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China
3.
Sugarcane Research Institute of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Sugarcane Research Center of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi), Ministry of Agriculture/Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Nanning 530007, China

More Information

Received Date: July 16, 2018
Available Online: May 17, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
To explore the effect of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)-mungbean(Vigna radiata) intercropping and different nitrogen application levels on sugarcane growth, yield and nitrogen nutrition, and provide a reference for rational sugarcane intercropping.

Method
Three cropping patterns (monocropping of mungbean, monocropping of sugarcane, intercropping of sugarcane and mungbean with mungbean straw returning), and three nitrogen treatments (no N application, reduced N application, conventional N application) were used in the experiments. Sugarcane traits during different growth period were measured.

Result
Tiller number, dry biomass, nitrogen uptake, number of millable stalks and cane yield of sugarcane were significantly affected by nitrogen level and cropping pattern. Sugarcane emergency number was also significantly affected by cropping pattern. Number and percentage of millable stalks, dry biomass and nitrogen uptake of sugarcane were significantly affected by nitrogen level×cropping pattern. Compared with monocropping of sugarcane, intercropping treatment reduced emergency number and tiller nubmer by 9.61%−10.52% and 10.30%−11.05% respectively, while increased number of millable stalks, dry biomass, nitrogen uptake and cane yield of sugarcane by 0.15%−14.28%, 14.28%−34.76%, 24.00%−29.58% and 15.88%−20.16%, respectively. For the intercropping treatment, the land equivalent ratio was 1.47−1.53 after sugarcane grew for 80 days, and the land equivalent ratio at sugarcane harvest was 1.76−1.94. The competition ability of sugarcane was greater than that of mungbean. Compared with monocropping of sugarcane with conventional N application, intercropping treatment with reduced N application did not decrease cane yield and soil nitrogen level.

Conclusion
Intercropping of sugarcane and mungbean can increase the land equivalent ratio and soil nitrogen level, promote sugarcane growth and increase cane yield and nitrogen uptake.
- sugarcane,
- mungbean,
- intercropping,
- N application level,
- growth,
- yield,
- nitrogen nutrition

FullText(HTML)

References (40)

References

[1]	LI Y R, YANG L T. Sugarcane agriculture and sugar industry in China[J]. Sugar Tech, 2015, 17(1): 1-8.
[2]	LIAO Q, WEI G P, CHEN G F, et al. Effect of trash addition to the soil on microbial communities and physico-chemical properties of soils and growth of sugarcane plants[J]. Sugar Tech, 2014, 16(4): 400-404.
[3]	SOLANKI M K, WANG Z, WANG F Y, et al. Intercropping in sugarcane cultivation influenced the soil properties and enhanced the diversity of vital diazotrophic bacteria[J]. Sugar Tech, 2017, 19(2): 1-12.
[4]	杨丽涛, 胡春锦, 林丽, 等. 广西甘蔗内生固氮菌资源及其应用的相关基础研究[C]//中国作物学会, 2014年中国作物学会学术年会论文集. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014.
[5]	朱秋珍, 李杨瑞, 刘晓燕. 广西发展农作物间套种技术的意义与建议[J]. 现代农业科技, 2012(1): 119-120.
[6]	邓宇驰, 王维赞, 张荣华, 等. 2016年广西蔗区甘蔗生产情况调研报告[J]. 热带农业科学, 2016, 36(12): 105-110.
[7]	曾艳, 黄金生, 周柳强, 等. 广西桂南蔗区土壤养分状况调查分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(12): 2198-2202.
[8]	谢如林, 谭宏伟, 周柳强, 等. 广西兴宾蔗区土壤养分状况分析[J]. 中国糖料, 2004, 26(1): 22-25.
[9]	SINGH A, KANG J S, KAUR C. Effect of ryegrass intercropping on the yield and net profit of autumn planted sugarcane[J]. Sugar Tech, 2004, 6(1/2): 99-100.
[10]	KF N K K, UMRIT G, DEVILLE J. Nitrogen fertilization of sugarcane in an intercropping system with maize and potato in the humid tropical climate of Mauritius[J]. Exp Agr, 1996, 32(2): 213-218.
[11]	GANA A K, BUSARI L D. Intercropping study in sugarcane[J]. Sugar Tech, 2003, 5(3): 193-196.
[12]	CHEN B, WANG J, ZHANG L, et al. Effect of intercropping pepper with sugarcane on populations of Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae) and its parasitoids[J]. Crop Prot, 2011, 30(3): 253-258.
[13]	SINGH A K, LAL M, SUMAN A. Effect of intercropping in sugarcane (Saccharum complex hybrid) on productivity of plant cane-ratoon system[J]. Indian J Agr Sci, 2008, 53(2): 140-144.
[14]	LI X, MU Y, CHENG Y, et al. Effects of intercropping sugarcane and soybean on growth, rhizosphere soil microbes, nitrogen and phosphorus availability[J]. Acta Physiol Plant, 2013, 35(4): 1113-1119.
[15]	SUMAN A, LAL M, SINGH A K, et al. Microbial biomass turnover in Indian subtropical soils under different sugarcane intercropping systems[J]. Agron J, 2006, 98(3): 698-704.
[16]	KAUR N, BHULLAR M S, GILL G. Weed management in sugarcane-canola intercropping systems in northern India[J]. Field Crop Res, 2016, 188: 1-9.
[17]	李宏图, 罗建新, 彭德元, 等. 绿肥翻压还土的生态效应及其对土壤主要物理性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(5): 172-175.
[18]	潘福霞, 鲁剑巍, 刘威, 等. 不同种类绿肥翻压对土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(6): 1359-1364.
[19]	张旭升. 甘蔗间种菜用大豆对其产量品质及土壤理化性状的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2013.
[20]	张丽琼, 陈超君, 欧丽萍, 等. 绿肥对甘蔗产量及品质的效应[J]. 亚热带农业研究, 2007, 3(2): 91-93.
[21]	刘鹏飞, 李向勇, 张正学, 等. 绿肥压青对甘蔗产量及抗旱性的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2015, 43(9): 35-37.
[22]	苏利荣, 何铁光, 苏天明, 等. 不同时期绿豆与甘蔗套种及秸秆还田模式研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(11): 2461-2467.
[23]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999.
[24]	肖焱波, 段宗颜, 金航, 等. 小麦–蚕豆间作体系中的氮节约效应及产量优势[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(2): 267-271.
[25]	李隆, 杨思存, 孙建好, 等. 小麦–大豆间作中作物种间的竞争作用和促进作用[J]. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(2): 197-200.
[26]	余常兵, 孙建好, 李隆. 种间相互作用对作物生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(1): 1-8.
[27]	李纪潮. 机械种植下不同行距间作春大豆对甘蔗的生长效应研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2017.
[28]	吴建明, 李杨瑞, 杨丽涛, 等. 甘蔗间种大豆的试验[J]. 作物杂志, 2011(5): 103-105.
[29]	谢金兰, 王维赞, 李长宁, 等. 甘蔗与豆科作物不同间种模式研究[J]. 中国糖料, 2015, 37(3): 12-14.
[30]	HE T G, SU L R, LI Y R, et al. Nutrient decomposition rate and sugarcane yield as influenced by mung bean intercropping and crop residue recycling[J]. Sugar Tech, 2018, 20(2): 154-162.
[31]	AMBROSANO E J, CANTARELLA H, AMBROSANO G M B, et al. The role of green manure nitrogen use by corn and sugarcane crops in Brazil[J]. Agr Sci, 2013, 4(12): 89-108.
[32]	BOKHTIAR S M, SAKURAI K. Effects of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on soil fertility and productivity of plant and ratoon crops of sugarcane[J]. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2005, 51(3): 325-334.
[33]	CHANDRA R, RANA N S, KUMAR S, et al. Effects of sugarcane residue and green manure practices in sugarcane-ratoon-wheat sequence on productivity, soil fertility and soil biological properties[J]. Arch Agron Soil Sci, 2008, 54(6): 651-664.
[34]	AMBROSANO E J, TRIVELIN P C O, CANTARELLA H, et al. ¹⁵N-labeled nitrogen from green manure and ammonium sulfate utilization by the sugarcane ratoon[J]. Sci Agr, 2011, 68(3): 361-368.
[35]	AMBROSANO E J, TRIVELIN P C O, CANTARELLA H, et al. Utilization of nitrogen from green manure and mineral fertilizer by sugarcane[J]. Sci Agr, 2005, 62(6): 534-542.
[36]	褚贵新, 沈其荣, 张娟, 等. 用¹⁵N富积标记和稀释法研究旱作水稻–花生间作系统中氮素固定和转移[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(4): 385-389.
[37]	雍太文, 杨文钰, 向达兵, 等. 小麦–玉米–大豆和小麦–玉米–甘薯套作对土壤氮素含量及氮素转移的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1): 148-158.
[38]	王秀林, 阳代天. 甘蔗不同生育期对氮磷钾的吸收与分配[J]. 土壤通报, 1994(5): 224-226.
[39]	杨文亭, 李志贤, 舒磊, 等. 甘蔗−大豆间作和减量施氮对甘蔗产量、植株及土壤氮素的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(20): 6108-6115.
[40]	宋为超, 刘春雨, 徐娇, 等. 初花后土壤碱解氮浓度对棉花生物量和氮素累积特征的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(7): 1257-1265.

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(15)

1.	周诗玉，王庆雷，赵胜国，韩建春，赵鹏武，刘春琴，张燕如. 白星花金龟虫粪砂对3种内蒙道地药材生长的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2024(04): 107-113 .
2.	周灵芝，黄渝岚，周佳，劳承英，申章佑，李艳英，韦本辉，张宪，王锋，李素平. 粉垄耕作与绿肥还田对土壤酶活性和甘蔗产量的影响. 福建农业学报. 2024(04): 409-417 .
3.	金建华，周恩强，周瑶，王学军，缪亚梅，顾春燕. 绿豆“通绿1号”生产技术规程. 农业科技与信息. 2023(01): 64-68 .
4.	尹若言，邹佳运. 绿豆新品种“凤绿4号”的选育及栽培技术. 云南农业科技. 2023(03): 55-57 .
5.	邹佳运，赵建荣. 绿豆新品种‘凤绿1号’的选育及栽培技术. 安徽科技学院学报. 2023(03): 60-64 .
6.	白善军，邹佳运. 绿豆新品种“凤绿3号”的选育及栽培技术. 湖南农业科学. 2023(06): 11-14 .
7.	莫璋红，谢金兰，林丽，李长宁，覃宁，潘红春，黄应设，陈荣发，莫善平. 减量施氮间作豆科绿肥压青对甘蔗农艺性状及产质量的影响. 现代农业科技. 2023(20): 38-42+46 .
8.	毛兵，曾悦，赖彩婷，杨艳，周春宏，李卓亭，徐强胜，李廷化. 减氮施肥对甘蔗生物量及土壤硝态氮和铵态氮的影响. 生态学杂志. 2023(11): 2604-2612 .
9.	范业赓，丘立杭，陈荣发，周慧文，李燕娇，闫海锋，罗含敏，周忠凤，邓宇驰，吴建明. 不同分蘖特性甘蔗品种生产力差异和相关性研究. 中国农业科技导报. 2023(12): 35-43 .
10.	范业赓，陈荣发，闫海锋，周慧文，翁梦苓，黄杏，罗霆，周忠凤，丘立杭，吴建明. 甘蔗轮作青饲玉米和花生对甘蔗生长和土壤性状的影响. 作物杂志. 2021(01): 104-111 .
11.	钟培阁，孙洪仁，张吉萍，吕玉才，王应海. 中国南方甘蔗土壤全氮丰缺指标与适宜施氮量初步研究. 中国糖料. 2020(03): 43-48 .
12.	谢金兰，林丽，李长宁，罗霆，莫璋红. 氮肥减量条件下间作绿豆压青对甘蔗生长及氮代谢的影响. 作物杂志. 2020(04): 164-169 .
13.	罗高玲，李经成，陈燕华. 适宜甘蔗间种的绿豆品种筛选. 中国种业. 2019(08): 41-44 .
14.	范业赓，丘立杭，陈荣发，周慧文，黄杏，卢星高，甘崇琨，吴建明，李杨瑞. 施氮水平对不同甘蔗品种产量和蔗糖分的影响. 中国糖料. 2019(04): 36-40 .
15.	罗高玲，李经成，陈燕华. 甘蔗间套种绿豆适宜播期试验研究. 农业科技通讯. 2019(11): 113-115+118 .

Other cited types(6)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1561) PDF downloads (1539) Cited by(21)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effects of sugarcane-mungbean intercropping, bean straw returning and nitrogen application level on sugarcane traits

Abstract

References

Cited by

Periodical cited type(15)

Other cited types(6)

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content