• Chinese Core Journal
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source journal
  • Journal of Citation Report of Chinese S&T Journals (Core Edition)
ZHANG Hongjian, WANG Fayong, LUO Jing, et al. Effects of soil and climate on photosynthetic characteristics and chemical constituents of strong-flavor flue-cured tobacco in different ecological subregions[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(1): 23-31. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201804023
Citation: ZHANG Hongjian, WANG Fayong, LUO Jing, et al. Effects of soil and climate on photosynthetic characteristics and chemical constituents of strong-flavor flue-cured tobacco in different ecological subregions[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(1): 23-31. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201804023

Effects of soil and climate on photosynthetic characteristics and chemical constituents of strong-flavor flue-cured tobacco in different ecological subregions

More Information
  • Received Date: April 11, 2018
  • Available Online: May 17, 2023
  • Objective 

    To investigate the effects of main ecological factors on feature formation of strong-flavor flue-cured tobacco.

    Method 

    ‘Yueyan 97’ was chosed as test material. According to the small differences on ecological condition and territory between two ecological subregions (Maozifeng and Gushi) in Nanxiong tobacco-growing area, four treatments by interchanging soil with the same texture were setted to study the effects of soil and climate on photosynthetic characteristics, chemical constituent contents and coordinations of strong-flavor flue-cured tobacco in different ecological subregions.

    Result 

    On the 50th day after transplanting, compared with tobacco planted in Gushi with local sandy soil and climate condition (T2), the net photosynthetic rate of tobacco planted in Gushi with Maozifeng sandy soil (T1) increased by 3.66%; the contents of total sugar, reducing sugar and starch in middle leaves decreased by 5.74%, 4.77% and 10.73% respectively, and the contents of nicotine, K+ and total nitrogen increased by 6.49%, 11.07% and 11.34% respectively. Meanwhile, compared with tobacco planted in Maozifeng with local sandy soil and climate condition (T4), the net photosynthetic rate of tobacco planted in Maozifeng with Gushi sandy soil (T3) increased by 1.81%, the contents of reducing sugar and nicotine in middle leaves decreased by 10.02% and 13.14% respectively, and starch content increased by 9.30%. The climate had significant impacts on the contents of total sugar, reducing sugar, nicotine , total nitrogen and starch, nitrogen-nicotine ratio, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, intercellular CO2 concentration and net photosynthetic rate; soil and climate interaction had significant impacts on the contents of reducing sugar, nicotine, total nitrogen and starch, nitrogen-nicotine ratio and stomatal conductance; soil had significant impacts on the contents of K+ and total nitrogen and sugar-nicotine ratio.

    Conclusion 

    Climate is the main factor affecting the feature formation of strong-flavor flue-cured tobacco, especially precipitation amount and mean temperature at root spreading and fast growing stages, followed by the interaction of soil and climate, and soil has the minimal role. The climate of Gushi is more suitable for production of superior strong-flavor tobacco leaves.

  • [1]
    周越, 周冀衡, 范幸龙, 等. 云南保山高海拔地区不同烤烟品种适宜性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(1): 254-257.
    [2]
    邵丽, 晋艳, 杨宇虹, 等. 生态条件对不同烤烟品种烟叶产质量的影响[J]. 烟草科技, 2002(10): 40-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0861.2002.10.010
    [3]
    许自成, 刘国顺, 刘金海, 等. 铜山烟区生态因素和烟叶质量特点[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(7): 1748-1753. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.07.031
    [4]
    李旭华, 何传国, 陈建军, 等. 广东浓香型特色烟叶关键生产技术理论与应用[M]. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2011.
    [5]
    蔡永占, 周普雄, 张柳, 等. 不同气候条件对“云烟87”旺长期叶片光合速率及蛋白表达的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2015, 21(1): 39-48.
    [6]
    赵福杨, 张耸, 钱宇, 等. 不同土壤类型对烤烟化学成分及其协调性的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(20): 38-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.20.013
    [7]
    王海涛. 河南烟区气候因素特征及对烟叶化学成分的影响与调控[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2013.
    [8]
    郭治兴, 陈泽鹏, 王静, 等. 广东省烟草土壤生态适宜性评价[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(4): 75-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2011.04.017
    [9]
    邓明军, 石媛媛, 高华军, 等. 广西靖西烟区烤烟种植生态适宜性分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(8): 86-90.
    [10]
    胡蓉花, 付宗仁, 凡中良, 等. 吉安烟区生态因素及植烟应对措施分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(27): 61-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2015.27.024
    [11]
    刘丽, 文俊, 林锐锋, 等. 浓香型烟叶特征及影响因素研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(18): 9504-9506. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.18.048
    [12]
    谢晓斌, 陈永明, 王军, 等. 南雄烟区生态条件分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2014, 35(4): 75-78.
    [13]
    刘国敏. 种植密度和施氮量对烟叶组织结构发育、化学成分及产质量的影响[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016.
    [14]
    全国烟草标准化技术委员会. 烤烟基本烘烤技术规程: YC/T42-1996[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1996.
    [15]
    王瑞新. 烟草化学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
    [16]
    邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
    [17]
    易建华, 彭新辉, 邓小华, 等. 气候和土壤及其互作对湖南烤烟还原糖、烟碱和总氮含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(16): 4467-4475.
    [18]
    雷利琴. 基于冠层反射光谱的油菜光合及生长监测[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2012.
    [19]
    金云峰, 王莎莎, 张建波, 等. 生长温度对不同生育期烟草叶片光合作用及质体色素代谢的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(22): 57-74. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15020075
    [20]
    柯学, 李军营, 李向阳, 等. 不同光质对烟草叶片生长及光合作用的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2011, 47(5): 512-520.
    [21]
    柯学, 李军营, 徐超华, 等. 不同光质对烟草叶片组织结构及Rubisco羧化酶活性和rbcrca基因表达的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2012, 48(3): 251-259.
    [22]
    COVARELLI L. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the photosynthetic activity, growth and yield of Virginia tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)[J]. Beiträge Zur Tabakforschung, 2015, 18(6): 245-254.
    [23]
    郑璞帆, 崔志燕, 陈富彩, 等. 喷施硅肥对烤烟圆顶期光合特性、氮钾含量及产质量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(4): 124-128.
    [24]
    刘国顺. 烟草栽培学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
    [25]
    王行, 郑荣豪, 柯油松, 等. 广东浓香型优质烟叶开发密集烘烤关键技术研究方向[J]. 江西农业学报, 2012, 24(9): 101-105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2012.09.028
    [26]
    黄爱缨, 木志坚, 蒋珍茂, 等. 土壤–气候和烟草品种及其互作对云南昭通烟叶化学品质的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(10): 55-63.
    [27]
    BOZHINOVA R. Effect of long-term potassium fertilization on the chemical composition of Oriental tobacco[J]. J Central European Agric, 2012, 13(3): 510-518. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/13.3.1078
    [28]
    彭新辉, 易建华, 周清明, 等. 土壤与气候及其互作对湖南烤烟还原糖与总植物碱含量的影响[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2010, 16(1): 11-15.
    [29]
    王育军, 周冀衡, 张一扬, 等. 云南保山烟区气象因子与烤烟化学成分的相关性分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(2): 109-115.
    [30]
    李琦, 王勇军, 蔡凤梅. 气候因子与烤烟常规化学成分相关性分析[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2014(4): 27-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2014.04.008
    [31]
    蔡雪姣, 陈建军, 吕永华, 等. 不同土壤类型烟叶组织结构及化学成分的差异比较[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2013, 25(6): 1177-1182.
    [32]
    母少东, 蒋光华, 李浩, 等. 不同植烟区土壤对烟叶碳氮代谢品质相关指标的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2014, 37(4): 109-116.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Hongna, SU Zuanxian, CHEN Houbin. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics of three litchi cultivars at full-bloom stage[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(2): 43-47. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2017.02.009
    [2]SHAN Tijiang, TANG Xiangyou, LIU Yi, WANG Wei, CHEN Xuan, DUAN Zhihao, WU Huixiong, WANG Jun. Chemical compositions and antibacterial activities of volatile oils from Taxodium ascendens leaves and cones[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(5): 72-76. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.05.013
    [3]WANG Jun, DING Xiaodong, LUO Jing, WANG Xiaobin, WANG Zhengren, CHEN Zepeng. Effects of climatic conditions on yield components and main chemical constituents of tobacco in Nanxiong, Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(3): 54-61. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.03.008
    [4]LIU Hao,CHEN Xiao-yang. Analysis on the Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil in Rhododendron nivale from Tibet[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2008, 29(4). DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2008.04.027
    [5]HE Ting-yu,GU Wen-xiang,MO Li-ping,FENG Li-ping,HE Yan-biao. Studies on the chemical constituents of volatile oil from Myoporum bontiodes[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2005, 26(3): 114-116. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2005.03.032
    [6]Zhou Zhihong 1 Luo Shiming 2 Mou Zipin 2. STUDY ON ALLELOPATHIC POTENTIALS OF SEVERAL CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OF TOMATO (Lycopersicon)[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 1998, (3): 56-60.
    [7]Dai Suxian \ Xie Chijun \ Yuan Xuepei \ Huang Guogan. THE AROMATIC CHEMICAL COMPONENT OF KODINGCHA ( Ilex kodingcha )[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 1998, (1): 68-72.
    [8]Lj Yuanzhi,Jian Jieyin. THE MAJOR CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS AND TOXICOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF Alpinia oxyphylla MIQ.[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 1996, (2): 108-111.
    [9]Huang Zhiwu, Lu Renjun. STUDIES ON RICE PLANTATION WITH PROPER COORDINATE FERTILIZATION OF RICE STRAW AND UREA[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 1996, (1): 61-66.
    [10]Ren Yonghao, Chen Jianjun ,Ma Changli. STUDY ON AROMA CHEMICAL COMPONENTS IN FLUE-CURED TOBACCO UNDER DIFFERENT pH VALUE AROUND ROOTS[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 1994, (1): 127-132.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(10)

    1. 翁倩文,陈伟强,王德勋,陈逸林,史宏志,马月红,于滢,苑钰珂. 基于集成机器学习的大理红花大金元种植适宜性区划. 中国烟草科学. 2025(02): 113-120 .
    2. 王发勇,王玉真,刘泽,祁林,刘继辉,王金宏,华一崑,汪显国,杨晶津. 醇化过程中云南清香型烟叶的化学成分分析. 西南农业学报. 2023(08): 1671-1676 .
    3. 杨佳豪,李钠钾,刘化冰,李正,刘建军,汪代斌,程昌和,刘洋,叶协锋. 有机无机肥配施对植烟土壤肥力和氮组分以及烟叶品质的影响. 江西农业学报. 2023(11): 72-79+86 .
    4. 刘一凡,李淮源,单雪华,雷佳,姚强,叶卫国,郭维,陈建军. 打顶涂抹生长素对烤烟上部叶内源激素和光合作用的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(04): 47-54 .
    5. 季舜华,赵羡波,王超超,詹仁锋,卢平,方正华. 保山烟区主要气候因子与烟叶化学成分的相关性. 贵州农业科学. 2021(06): 134-139 .
    6. 余凌翔,鲁韦坤,张加云,朱勇,逄涛,赵泽. 烤烟叶片光合速率日变化特征及其影响因素分析. 气象与环境科学. 2021(05): 79-86 .
    7. 梁琼月,潘明君,尹永强,唐新莲,陈登科,沈方科,韦建玉,张纪利,贾海江. 育苗期施用复合植物生长调节剂对烤烟生长、产量及品质的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报. 2020(02): 98-104+111 .
    8. 郑小雨,白森,祁春苗,白金莹,马京民,王勇军,申洪涛. 烤烟上部叶的生态环境匹配度分析. 河南农业大学学报. 2020(03): 520-525 .
    9. 赵文军,田阳阳,常立,陈华,冯瑜,王正旭,王军伟,刘魁,朱云聪,孙蒙猛,宛祥,杨继周,胡保文. 抚仙湖流域植烟土壤养分特征及烟叶综合质量对比. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2020(05): 513-518 .
    10. 路丹,张得平,梁永进,石保峰,韦建玉,袁维,李界秋,首安发,沈方科. 不同用量高碳基有机肥对烤烟生长及产质量的影响. 贵州农业科学. 2019(10): 23-28 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Corresponding author: CHEN Jianjun, chenjianjun@scau.edu.cn

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed
    Article views (1192) PDF downloads (1161) Cited by(15)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return