- Chinese Core Journal
- Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source journal
- Journal of Citation Report of Chinese S&T Journals (Core Edition)
| Citation: |
FANG Yiran, CAI Jinhuan, XUE Li. Undergrowth plant diversity and soil physical properties in three reformed plantations[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2018, 39(4): 87-92. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2018.04.014
|
To investigate the undergrowth diversity and soil physical properties in three plantations at Yunyong forest farm in Foshan, Guangdong Province and provide a theoretical basis for ecological forest cultivation and management.
Tutcheria championii was planted in a pure broad-leaved plantation (P1 plot); Cunninghamia lanceolata, Mytilaria laosensis, Elaeocarpus apiculatus, Michelia macclurei, Liquidambar formosana and Alstonia scholarisv were planted in a mixed conifer-broad leaf plantation (P2 plot); M. laosensis, Castanopsis hystri and Erythrophleum fordii were planted in a mixed broad-leaved plantation (P3 plot). Species diversity, coverage, number of total plants and average height of shrub-herb layer under canopy of above plots were investigated. Diversity and evenness indexes were used to study undergrowth species diversity of these plantations. The 100 cm3 cutting ring was used to collect soil samples from the 0-20 cm soil layer at three plots, respectively, and soil physical properties such as water content and bulk density were determined.
The mean values of Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Simpson diversity index of shrub species were lower than herb species while the mean values of evenness indexes of shrub species were larger than herb species in the three plots. The growth status of herb species were superior to shrub species in the three plots. The species number and quantity of the undergrowth of P1 plot were more than those of P2 and P3 plots. The soil bulk density of P1 plot was the highest among the three plots while that of P2 plot was the lowest. The values of total soil porosity, natural moisture content, capillary moisture capacity, capillary porosity, non-capillary porosity and aeration porosity of the three plots were all in the order of P2 plot > P3 plot > P1 plot.
The community structure and soil quality of mixed plantations are better than those of pure plantation.
| [1] |
黄继红, 郭仲军, 刘永红, 等. 陕西省宁陕县天然林保护工程生态效益价值评估[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(1): 298-303.
|
| [2] |
魏天兴, 赵健, 朱文德, 等. 退耕还林区水土保持植被恢复及物种多样性特征[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2013, 28(1): 1-6.
|
| [3] |
李民义, 张建军, 郭宝妮, 等. 晋西黄土区不同密度油松人工林林下植物多样性及水文效应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(5): 1083-1090.
|
| [4] |
郭琦, 王新杰. 不同混交模式杉木人工林林下植被生物量与土壤物理性质研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(5): 70-74.
|
| [5] |
任小丽, 何洪林, 刘敏, 等. 基于模型数据融合的千烟洲亚热带人工林碳水通量模拟[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(23): 7313-7326.
|
| [6] |
彭佳红, 王华, 邹冬生, 等. 亚热带区域几种典型人工林生态系统林地土壤质量评价[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(1): 93-99.
|
| [7] |
RASHEED S M K. The Effect of clay content and land use on dispersion ratio at different locations in Sulaimani Governorate, Kurdistan Region, Iraq[J]. Open J Soil Sci, 2016, 6(1): 1-8.
|
| [8] |
谢亚军, 谢永宏, 陈心胜, 等. 洞庭湖湿地土壤持水能力及其影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(8): 1153-1160.
|
| [9] |
ALEM S, PAVLIS J, URBAN J, et al. Pure and mixed plantations of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Cupressus lusitanica: Their growth interactions and effect on diversity and density of undergrowth woody plants in relation to light[J]. Open J Forestry, 2015, 5(4): 375-386.
|
| [10] |
唐铭灿, 潘登, 潘高. 湘中丘陵区3种林分林下植物多样性与土壤特性研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2016, 43(1): 38-43.
|
| [11] |
崔宁洁, 张丹桔, 刘洋, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(10): 2610-2617.
|
| [12] |
白可喻, 戎郁萍, 杨云卉, 等. 北方农牧交错带草地生物多样性与草地生产力和土壤状况的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(1): 22-26.
|
| [13] |
DE CARVALHO F, GODOY E L, LISBOA F J G, et al. Relationship between physical and chemical soil attributes and plant species diversity in tropical mountain ecosystems from Brazil[J]. J Mount Sci, 2014, 11(4): 875-883.
|
| [14] |
侯晓丽, 薛立. 冰雪灾害对粤北杉木林生物多样性的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(5): 89-94.
|
| [15] |
齐智娟, 冯浩, 张体彬, 等. 干旱区大田玉米膜下滴灌土壤水热效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(1): 172-178.
|
| [16] |
丛培东, 刘孝竹, 马红. 蒲石河蓄能电站河岸带土壤性质分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(27): 172-174.
|
| [17] |
苏宇乔, 张毅, 贾小容, 等. 几种多样性指标在森林群落分析中的应用比较[J]. 生态科学, 2017(1): 132-138.
|
| [18] |
刘彤, 胡丹, 魏晓雪, 等. 红松人工林林下植物物种多样性分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(5): 28-29.
|
| [19] |
张桐, 王玉杰, 王云琦, 等. 晋西黄土区不同森林群落类型植物多样性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(11): 82-88.
|
| [20] |
潘声旺, 何茂萍, 杨丽娟, 等. 先锋植物丰富度对公路边坡植物群落生长发育及护坡效益的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(11): 24-31.
|
| [21] |
刘平, 马履一, 贾黎明, 等. 北京低山油松人工林径阶结构及林下植物多样性特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(3): 57-63.
|
| [22] |
高俊芳, 陈云明, 许鹏辉, 等. 不同干扰措施下黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林生长结构及土壤理化性质分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2011, 31(5): 69-74.
|
| [23] |
刘效东, 乔玉娜, 周国逸. 土壤有机质对土壤水分保持及其有效性的控制作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(12): 1209-1218.
|
| [24] |
徐昕, 刘晓勇, 江柳春, 等. 江西省生态公益林5种典型林分类型土壤性质特点分析[J]. 南方林业科学, 2016, 44(5): 54-57.
|
| [25] |
赵筱青, 和春兰, 许新惠. 云南山地尾叶桉类林引种对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(11): 1810-1816.
|
| [26] |
马云波, 牛聪傑, 许中旗. 不同造林模式对铁尾矿地土壤性质的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3): 242-248.
|
| [27] |
曹鹤, 薛立, 谢腾芳, 等. 华南地区八种人工林的土壤物理性质[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(4): 620-625.
|
| [28] |
陈奇伯, 王克勤, 李艳梅, 等. 金沙江干热河谷不同类型植被改良土壤效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2003, 17(2): 67-70.
|
| [29] |
顾宇书, 邢兆凯, 韩友志, 等. 浑河上游4种典型水源林土壤物理性质及其水源涵养功能[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(1): 37-41.
|
| [30] |
叶绍明, 温远光, 杨梅, 等. 连栽桉树人工林植物多样性与土壤理化性质的关联分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(4): 246-250.
|
| [31] |
杜忠, 蔡小虎, 包维楷, 等. 林下层植被对上层乔木的影响研究综述[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3): 963-972.
|
| [32] |
TAKAHASHI K, UEMURA S, SUZUKI J I, et al. Effects of understory dwarf bamboo on soil water and the growth of overstory trees in a dense secondary Betula ermanii, forest, northern Japan[J]. Ecol Res, 2003, 18(6): 767-774.
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: