Citation: | YUAN Zhongyou, LIANG Zhonglong, YANG Qijun, LIU Qing, WU Jialong, DAI Jun. Effects of organic fertilizer on microbial characteristics and enzyme activities of soil degraded by highway construction[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(6): 58-63. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2017.06.009 |
To study the short-term effects of different fertilizers on microbial characteristics and enzyme activities of lateritic soil degraded by highway construction.
Greenhouse pot experiments were performed using Neyraudia reynaudiana. The lateritic soil degraded by highway construction was used as control(CK). Three fertilization treatments included chemical fertilizer(HF) with the same NPK degree as vermicompost, cattle manure (NF) and vermicompost (YF). The effects of different treatments on soil microbial characteristics and enzyme activities were investigated by principal component analysis.
Compared with HF treatment, soil microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen, soil respiration, amounts of metabolic entropy, bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes significantly increased by 70%, 96%, 1 239%, 699%, 300%, 1 155% and 272% respectively in NF treatment, and increased by 80%, 130%, 1 458%, 773%, 295%, 324% and 285% respectively in YF treatment(P<0.05). Soil invertase, urease, catalase, acid phosphatase,β-glucosidase, acetylglucosaminidase, polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase activities significantly increased by 61%, 37%, 36%, 119%, 259%, 1 973%, 175% and 550% respectively in NF treatment, and increased by 66%, 40%, 52%, 128%, 302%, 1 641%, 182% and 428% respectively in YF treatment (P<0.05).
In short-term, applying organic fertilizer such as cattle manure and vermicompost is better than using chemical fertilizer for improving soil microbial properties, enhancing soil enzyme activities and improving comprehensive quality of soil degraded by construction. NF and YF treatments have no significant differences in their effects on soil microbial properties and enzyme activities. Applying organic fertilizer is an effective way to repair rapidly the soil degraded by construction.
[1] |
袁中友, 郭彦彪, 李强, 等. 有机无机肥配施对生态重建先锋植物类芦生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(5): 302-308.
|
[2] |
GIL-SOTRES F, TRASAR-CEPEDA C, LEIRÓS M C, et al. Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2005, 37(5): 877-887.
|
[3] |
LAGOMARSINO A, MOSCATELLI M C, TIZIO A D, et al. Soil biochemical indicators as a tool to assess the short-term impact of agricultural management on changes in organic C in a Mediterranean environment[J]. Ecol Indic, 2009, 9(3): 518-527.
|
[4] |
DORAN J W, SARRANTONIO M, LIEBIG M A. Soil health and sustainability[J]. Adv Agron, 1996, 56(8): 1-54.
|
[5] |
VANCE E D, BROOKES P C, JENKINSON D S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 1987, 19(6): 703-707.
|
[6] |
SPARLING G P. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter[J]. Soil Res, 1992, 30(2): 195-207.
|
[7] |
WANG W J, DALAL R C, MOODY P W, et al. Relationships of soil respiration to microbial biomass, substrate availability and clay content[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2003, 35(2): 273-284.
|
[8] |
ANDERSON T H. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to asses soil quality[J]. Agric Ecos Environ, 2003, 98(1/2/3): 285-293.
|
[9] |
李振高, 骆永明, 滕应. 土壤与环境微生物研究法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
|
[10] |
IYYEMPERUMAL K, SHI W. Soil enzyme activities in two forage systems following application of different rates of swine lagoon effluent or ammonium nitrate[J]. Appl Soil Eco, 2008, 38(2): 128-136.
|
[11] |
EIVAZI F, TABATABAI M A. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 1988, 20(5): 601-606.
|
[12] |
THIOULOUSE J, CHESSEL D, DOLE D S, et al. ADE-4: A multivariate analysis and graphical display software[J]. Statcomput, 1997, 7(1): 75-83.
|
[13] |
EBHIN MASTO R, CHHONKAR P K, SINGH D, et al. Changes in soil biological and biochemical characteristics in a long-term field trial on a sub-tropical inceptisol[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2006, 38(7): 1577-1582.
|
[14] |
PLAZA C, HEMÁNDEZ D, GARCIA-GIL J C, et al. Microbial activity in pig slurry-amended soils under semiarid conditions[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2004, 36(10): 1577-1585.
|
[15] |
KAUTZ T, WIRTH S, ELLMER F. Microbial activity in a sandy soil is governed by the fertilization regime[J]. Eur J Soil Biol, 2004, 40(2): 87-94.
|
[16] |
张聪俐, 戴军, 周波, 等. 不同比例蚓粪对玉米生长以及土壤肥力特性的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2013, 34(2): 137-143.
|
[17] |
贾德新, 李士平, 王风丹, 等. 蚯蚓粪对豇豆根际土壤生物学特征及微生物活性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016, 28(2): 318-323.
|
[18] |
井大炜. 施用蚯蚓粪对杨树苗根际土壤生物学特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2014, 34(1): 133-137.
|
[19] |
杨丽娟, 杨启迪, 周崇峻, 等. 施用蚓粪堆肥对温室番茄产量和品质及土壤微生物数量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(6): 1455-1459.
|
[20] |
JOERGENSEN R G, ANDERSON T H, WOLTERS V. Carbon and nitrogen relationships in the microbial biomass of soils in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests[J]. Biol Fertil Soil, 1995, 19(2): 141-147.
|
[21] |
黎宁, 李华兴, 朱凤娇, 等. 菜园土壤的理化性质和微生物生态特征与种植年限的关系[J]. 生态环境, 2005, 14(6): 925-929.
|
[22] |
张池, 陈旭飞, 周波, 等. 不同比例蚓粪对旱地土壤微生物学特性以及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2014, 19(1): 118-124.
|
[23] |
张宝贵, 李贵桐, 申天寿. 威廉环毛蚯蚓对土壤微生物量及活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2000, 20(1): 169-173.
|
[24] |
李君剑, 严俊霞, 李洪建. 矿区不同复垦措施对土壤碳矿化和酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(12): 4178-4185.
|
[25] |
苏晓红, 高志岭, 刘建玲, 等. 蚯蚓粪和磷肥配施对油菜生长和土壤性质的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2010, 33(3): 8-12.
|
[26] |
马晓霞, 王莲莲, 黎青慧, 等. 长期施肥对玉米生育期土壤微生物量碳氮及酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(17): 5502-5511.
|