• Chinese Core Journal
  • Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source journal
  • Journal of Citation Report of Chinese S&T Journals (Core Edition)
MA Yonghong, YANG Zengjiang, XU Daping, LIU Xiaojin, ZHANG Ningnan. Variations in morphology and sowing quality of Dalbergia tonkinensis seeds from different provenances in Vietnam[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(3): 107-114. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.03.017
Citation: MA Yonghong, YANG Zengjiang, XU Daping, LIU Xiaojin, ZHANG Ningnan. Variations in morphology and sowing quality of Dalbergia tonkinensis seeds from different provenances in Vietnam[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(3): 107-114. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.03.017

Variations in morphology and sowing quality of Dalbergia tonkinensis seeds from different provenances in Vietnam

More Information
  • Received Date: September 10, 2015
  • Available Online: May 17, 2023
  • Objective 

    To investigate the variations in morphology and sowing quality of Dalbergia tonkinensis seeds, and provide a basis for elite germplasm selection and further genetic improvement.

    Method 

    Morphology and germination of D. tonkinensis seeds of 47 families collected from 10 provenances in Vietnam were studied.

    Result 

    Seed length ranged from 10.22 mm to 15.43 mm, seed width ranged from 5.76 mm to 8.56 mm, seed thickness ranged from 1.59 mm to 2.56 mm and 1 000-seed mass ranged from 64.90 g to 153.73 g. The seeds from Gia Lai provenance had the highest germination rate of 72.6%, followed by those from Bắc Ninh of 69.4% germination rate, and the seeds from Huế had the lowest germination rate of 30.0%. Analysis of variance revealed that seed length, seed width, 1 000-seed mass, germination potential and germination index had highly significant differences (P<0.01) among provenances. Seed germination rate and seed thickness/width ratio had significant differences (P<0.05) among provenances. Seed thickness and seed length/width ratio had the lowest differences among provenances. There were also significant differences in seed length, seed width, and seed thickness among different families within individual provenances. The variability in 1 000-seed mass among provenances which ranged from 72.410 g to 139.671 g was much higher than the variability in 1 000-seed mass among families within individual provenances which ranged from 76.77 g to 118.11 g. Seed germination rate had highly significant positive correlation with 1 000-seed mass and seed width. Seed length, seed width and 1 000-seed mass had highly significant positive correlation with altitude and hours of sunshine. Cluster analysis indicated that the production areas of D. tonkinensis could be divided into three major regions.

    Conclusion 

    Seed size and seed proportion are the key factors affecting seed germination. Three major production regions of D. tonkinensis can be divided in Vietnam.

  • [1]
    中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志:第40卷[M].北京:科学出版社, 1994:121.
    [2]
    吴师强, 李大周, 陆文, 等.越南黄花梨形态特性及引种植物名称研究初报[J].热带林业, 2013, 41(3):25-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938.2013.03.009
    [3]
    国家质量技术监督局. 红木: GB/T18107—2000[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
    [4]
    陈美红, 刘小金, 徐大平, 等.越南黄花梨育苗技术[J].林业实用技术, 2014(7):33-34. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lysyjs201407011
    [5]
    刘小金, 徐大平, 杨曾奖, 等.温度对越南黄花梨种子萌发的影响[J].林业科学研究, 2014, 27(5):707-709. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykxyj201405022
    [6]
    国家质量技术监督局. 林木种子检验规程: GB2772—1999[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1999: 116.
    [7]
    王成. 西伯利亚红松引种与种源试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2011. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10225-1011146728.htm
    [8]
    李晓洁, 徐化成.白皮松种子发芽习性及其种源变异的研究[J].林业科学, 1989, 25(2):97-105. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.1989.02.012
    [9]
    杨志玲, 杨旭, 谭梓峰, 等.厚朴不同种源及家系种子性状的变异[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2009, 29(5):49-55. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/znlxyxb200905007
    [10]
    刘桂丰, 孔红娃.白桦不同种源种子形态特征及发芽率[J].东北林业大学学报, 1999, 27(4):1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.1999.04.001
    [11]
    栗宏林, 张志翔, 张鑫.小桐子不同产地种子性状及苗期生长差异研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2010, 24(2):204-208. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201002037
    [12]
    李春, 樊东函, 梁机, 等.大叶栎种子性状与苗期生长地理种源变异[J].广西科学, 2009, 16(2):210-214. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=GXKK200902036&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
    [13]
    舒枭, 杨志玲, 杨旭, 等.不同产地厚朴种子性状的变异分析[J].林业科学研究, 2010, 23(3):457-461. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykxyj201003025
    [14]
    程诗明, 顾万春.苦楝表型性状梯度变异的研究[J].林业科学, 2006, 42(5):29-35. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx200605006
    [15]
    武高林, 杜国祯.植物种子大小与幼苗生长策略研究进展[J].应用生态学报, 2008, 19(1):191-197. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb200801032
    [16]
    黄双全, 刘桂霞, 韩建国.种子大小和播种深度对种苗建植的影响[J].草业科学, 2007, 24(6):44-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2007.06.011
    [17]
    武高林, 杜国祯, 尚占环.种子大小及其命运对植被更新贡献研究进展[J].应用生态学报, 2006, 17(10):1969-1972. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2006.10.037
    [18]
    宗文杰, 刘坤, 卜海燕, 等.高寒草甸51种菊科植物种子大小变异及其对种子萌发的影响研究[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 42(5):52-55. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0455-2059.2006.05.011
    [19]
    HARPER J L, LOVELL P H, MOORE K G.The shapes and sizes of seeds[J]. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 1970, 1(1): 327-356. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001551
    [20]
    FEMMER M. Relationships between seed weight ash content and seedling growth in twenty-four species of Compositae[J]. New Phytol, 1983, 95(4):697-706. doi: 10.1111/nph.1983.95.issue-4
    [21]
    SILVERTOWN J. Seed size, life span, and germination date as co-adapted features of plant life history[J]. Am Nat, 1981, 118(6):860-864. doi: 10.1086/283876
    [22]
    朱念德.植物学:形态解剖结构[M].广州:中山大学出版社, 2000: 179-180.

Catalog

    Article views (1276) PDF downloads (1491) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return