Citation: | LI Juan, LIN Weifu, ZHOU Lijun. Effect of light intensity on tuber morphology, starch content and leaf chlorophyll content of calla lily[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(3): 62-66. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.03.009 |
In order to understand the response of calla lily, Alocasia macrorrhiza L., to different light intensities, verify the accuracy of SPAD chlorophyll meter in chlorophyll measurements of calla lily, and provide a theoretical basis and technical supports for utilizing large land resources under mature rubber plantation and using chlorophyll meter correctly in physiological experiments of calla lily.
SPAD value, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll contents of different calla lily leaves under different light intensities were determined using SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter and alcohol-acetone extraction methods.
Compared with calla lily grown under natural light, tuber starch content and girth of calla lily under tree-shade decreased by 15.08% and 12.96% respectively, while tuber length increased by 12.11%.SPAD value, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll contents of calla lily under natural light were lower than those of calla lily under tree-shade, while chlorophyll a/b ratio was higher. SPAD value of calla lily under natural light increased gradually from the first-top-leaf to the fifth-top-leaf (except the third-top-leaf). SPAD value of calla lily under tree-shade increased gradually from the first-top-leaf to the second-top-leaf reaching the maximum, and then decreased gradually from the third-top-leaf to the fifth-top-leaf. Light intensity influenced chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll contents of different leaves in the same way as it did for SPAD value, but in different degree.
Light is conducive to starch synthesis in calla lily tubers. Calla lily can capture more light energy through increasing SPAD value, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll contents of leaves, especially the upper leaves, under limited light conditions. The SPAD value of the fourth-top-leaf is the best estimation for the chlorophyll contents of calla lily under natural light, while the SPAD value of the fifth-top-leaf is the best estimation for the chlorophyll contents under tree-shade.
[1] |
可燕, 周秀佳, 柏巧明, 等.我国海芋属植物资源及利用[J].湖北农学院学报, 1999, 19(1): 11-13. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199900249002
|
[2] |
吴爰爰, 刘迎辉, 李震, 等.马齿苋在不同光照强度下生物量及营养成分的动态变化研究[J].食品工业科技, 2008, 29(6): 102-103. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spgykj200806023
|
[3] |
桂克印, 文亮晶, 李炎, 等.不同光照处理对绿萝表型可塑性的影响[J].安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(21): 9956-9960. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2009.21.055
|
[4] |
芦站根, 周文杰, 赵昌琼.不同光照强度对曼地亚红豆杉叶抗寒力的影响[J].植物研究, 2003, 23(23): 285-289. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=MBZW200303009&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
|
[5] |
冯志立, 冯玉龙, 曹坤芳.光强对砂仁叶片光合作用光抑制及热耗散的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2002, 26(1): 77-82. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2002.01.013
|
[6] |
罗美佳. 光照对三七生长、光合特性及有效成分积累的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014: 1-34. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10712-1014430374.htm
|
[7] |
吴伟, 程旺大, 徐建良.灌浆成熟期光照强度对早籼稻直链淀粉含量及淀粉RVA谱特性的影响[J].浙江农业学报, 2006, 18(3): 141-145. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2006.03.003
|
[8] |
安翠香. 光照强度对甜瓜果实大小发育和糖分积累的影响[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10733-2009029052.htm
|
[9] |
高俊凤.植物生理实验技术[M].西安:世界图书出版公司, 2000: 101-148.
|
[10] |
王祥宁, 熊丽, 陈敏, 等.不同光照条件下东方百合生长状态及生物量的分配[J].西南农业学报, 2007, 20(5): 1091-1096. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2007.05.048
|
[11] |
丑敏霞, 朱利泉, 张玉进, 等.不同光照强度和温度对金钗石斛生长的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2001, 25(3): 325-330. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2001.03.011
|
[12] |
葛永金, 刘跃钧, 高伟, 等.不同光照强度下楠木属3个树种苗木的形态响应与适应[J].江西农业大学学报, 2014, 36(1): 109-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2014.01.017
|
[13] |
MOREIRA A S F P, DE LEMOS FILHO J P, ZOTZ G, et al.Anatomy and photosynthetic parameters of roots and leaves of two shade-adapted orchids, Dichaea cogniauxiana Shltr. and Epidendrum secundum Jacq.[J]. Flora-Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants, 2009, 204(8): 604-611. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=JJ0211480448
|
[14] |
刘文海, 高东升, 束怀瑞.不同光强处理对设施桃树光合及荧光特性的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2006, 39(10): 2069-2075. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2006.10.018
|
[15] |
杨志民, 陈煜, 韩烈保, 等.不同光照强度对高羊茅形态和生理指标的影响[J].草业学报, 2007, 16(6): 23-29. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2007.06.004
|
[16] |
童淑媛, 宋凤斌, 徐洪文.玉米不同叶位叶片SPAD值的变化及其与生物量的相关性[J].核农学报, 2008, 22(6): 869-874. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNXB200806026.htm
|
[17] |
HLAVINKA J, NAUŠ J, ŠPUNDOVÁ M. Anthocyanin contribution to chlorophyll meter readings and its correction[J]. Photosynth Res, 2013, 118(3): 277-295. doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9934-y
|
[18] |
MONJE O A, BUGBEE B. Inherent limitations of nondestructive chlorophyll meters: A comparison of two types of meters[J]. Hort Sci, 1992, 27 (1): 69-71. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=de3db10f7a707fda73dd3c77caae3d80&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
|