Effect of fertilization on soil active organic carbon and carbon pool management index under maize/soybean intercropping condition

ZHANG Yajie; QIAN Huihui; LIU Kunping; SU Yirong; LI Fusheng

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.03.005

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2016 > 37(3): 29-36. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.03.005

ZHANG Yajie, QIAN Huihui, LIU Kunping, SU Yirong, LI Fusheng. Effect of fertilization on soil active organic carbon and carbon pool management index under maize/soybean intercropping condition[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(3): 29-36. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.03.005

Citation:

PDF (2455 KB)

Effect of fertilization on soil active organic carbon and carbon pool management index under maize/soybean intercropping condition

1.
College of Agriculture, Guangxi University/Guangxi Academician Work Station of The New Technology of Water-Saving Agriculture in Karst Region/ Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Tillage, Nanning 530005, China
2.
Huanjiang Station of Karst Eco-system, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang 547100, China

More Information

Received Date: August 28, 2015
Available Online: May 17, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
Effects of different fertilizer applications on organic carbon fraction and carbon pool management index in soil were investigated under maize/soybean intercropping condition.
Method
Taking no fertilization (CK) as the control, five different fertilizing treatments, which were chemical nitrogen+ phosphorus+ potassium fertilizers (NPK), 70%NPK+30% straw (J1), 70%NPK+30% cow dung (N1), 40%NPK+60% straw (J2) and 40%NPK+60% cow dung (N2) according to the same rates of N, P and K, were designed in a long-term field experiment. The contents of organic carbon, soluble organic carbon, readily organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon were measured, and soil carbon pool management index was calculated.
Result
Compared to CK, soil organic carbon contents of N1, J2 and N2 treatments significantly increased in 2013, and the soil organic carbon contents of all fertilizing treatments significantly increased in 2014. Except for NPK treatment in 2013, the soil dissolved organic carbon contents in 2013 and 2014 were significantly higher than that of CK. The dissolved organic carbon content of J2 treatment was the highest, which was significantly higher than that of NPK in 2013. The readily organic carbon contents of N1, J2 and N2 treatments were significantly higher than that of CK in 2013 and 2014, and the highest value appeared in N2 treatment. The microbial biomass carbon contents of all fertilizing treatments were significantly higher than that of CK, and the highest value appeared in N2 treatment. Compared with CK in the same year, the carbon pool management indexes of fertilizing treatments significantly increased, and the carbon pool management index of N2 treatment was the highest.
Conclusion
The combined application of 40%NPK fertilizer and 60% cow dung is the optimal treatment for improving soil organic carbon fraction and carbon pool management index under maize/soybean intercropping condition in Karst area of northwest Guangxi.

FullText(HTML)

References (31)

References

[1]	MCLAUCHLAN K K, SARAH E, HOBBIE. Comparison of labile soil organic matter fractionation techniques[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2004, 68: 1616-1625. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.1616
[2]	ALVAREZ R, ALVAREZ C R. Soil organic matter pools and their associations with carbon mineralization kinetics[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2000, 64: 184-189. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.641184x
[3]	沈宏, 曹志洪, 胡正义.土壤活性有机碳的表征及其生态效应[J].生态学杂志, 1999, 18(3): 32-38. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.1999.03.008
[4]	佟小刚. 长期施肥下我国典型农田土壤有机碳库变化特征[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-82101-2008130425.htm
[5]	LEFROY R D, BLAIR G J, STRONG W M. Changes in soil organic matter with cropping as measured by organic carbon fractions and ¹³C natural isotope abundance[J]. Plant Soil, 1993(155/156): 399-402. doi: 10.1007-BF00025067/
[6]	徐明岗, 于荣, 孙小凤, 等.长期施肥对我国典型土壤活性有机质及碳库管理指数的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(4): 459-465. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2006.04.001
[7]	SANJAY K G, JULIE G L, JOHN M D. Soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in Nepal long-term soil fertility experiments[J]. Soil Till Res, 2009, 106: 95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2009.10.003
[8]	沈宏, 曹志洪, 徐志红.施肥对土壤不同碳形态及碳库管理指数的影响[J].土壤学报, 2000, 37(2): 166-173. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2000.02.003
[9]	宇万太, 赵鑫, 马强, 等.长期定位试验下施肥对潮棕壤活性碳库及碳库管理指数的影响[J].土壤通报, 2008, 39(3): 539-544. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2008.03.016
[10]	兰安军, 张百平, 熊康宁.黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析[J].地理研究, 2003, 22(6): 733-742. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2003.06.008
[11]	刘芳, 王世杰, 刘元生, 等.喀斯特石漠化过程土壤质量变化及生态环境影响评价[J].生态学报, 2005, 25(3): 639-644. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.03.035
[12]	鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
[13]	吴金水, 林启美, 黄巧云, 等.土壤微生物生物量测定方法及其应用[M].北京:气象出版社, 2006.
[14]	BLAIR G J, LEFORY R D. Soil C fractions based on their degree of oxidation and the development of a C management index for agricultural systems[J]. Aust J Agric Res, 1995, 46: 1459-1466. doi: 10.1071/AR9951459
[15]	李平儒, 任卫东, 李志军, 等.长期施肥管理对塿土全碳和易氧化有机碳的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2010, 19(12): 194-201. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=XBNX201012037&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[16]	王玲莉, 韩晓日, 杨劲峰, 等.长期施肥对棕壤有机碳组分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(1): 79-83. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2008.01.013
[17]	韩晓日, 苏俊峰, 谢芳, 等.长期施肥对棕壤有机碳及各组分的影响[J].土壤通报, 2008, 39(4):730-733. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2008.04.003
[18]	张永全, 寇长林, 马政华, 等.长期有机肥与氮肥配施对潮土有机碳和有机氮组分的影响[J].土壤通报, 2015, 46(3): 584-588. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trtb201503012
[19]	刘淑霞, 王鸿斌, 赵兰坡, 等.不同施肥方式下黑土有机碳的变化规律研究[J].河南农业科学, 2008(2): 48-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2008.02.014
[20]	陈云峰, 韩雪梅, 胡诚, 等.长期施肥对黄棕壤固碳速率及有机碳组分影响[J].生态环境学报, 2013, 22(2): 269-275. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2013.02.016
[21]	倪进治, 徐建民, 谢正苗, 等.不同有机肥料对土壤生物活性有机质组分的动态影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7(4): 374-378. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2001.04.003
[22]	杨长明, 欧阳竹, 董玉红.不同施肥模式对潮土有机碳组分及团聚体稳定性的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2005, 24(8): 887-892. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2005.08.008
[23]	SINSABAUGH R L, ZAK D R, GALLO M, et al. Nitrogen deposition and dissolved organic carbon production in northern temperate forests[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2004, 36(9): 1509- 1515. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.026
[24]	CRONAN C S, LAKSHMAN S, PATTERSON H H. Effects of disturbance and soil amendments on dissolved organic carbon and organic acidity in red pine forest floors[J]. J Environ Qual, 1992, 21 (3): 457-463. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=4f7673ad93bc5d8deac1c70c931f1499&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[25]	李玲, 朱捍华, 苏以荣, 等.稻草还田和易地还土对红壤丘陵农田土壤有机碳及其活性组分的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2009, 42(3): 926-933. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.03.022
[26]	王艳, 杨丽娟, 周崇峻, 等.长期施肥对设施蔬菜栽培土壤易氧化有机碳含量及其剖面分布的影响[J].水土保持通报, 2010, 30(4): 32-35. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201001910987
[27]	张春霞, 郝明德, 魏孝荣, 等.黑垆土长期轮作培肥土壤有机质氧化稳定性的研究[J].土壤肥料, 2004 (3): 11-12. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trfl200403003
[28]	徐阳春, 沈其荣, 雷宝坤, 等.水旱轮作下长期免耕和施用有机肥对土壤某些肥力性状的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2000, 11(4): 549-552. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2000.04.016
[29]	赵鑫, 宇万太, 李建东, 等.不同施肥模式下潮棕壤稻田的速效养分状况和水稻的养分分配[J].生态学杂志, 2007, 26(6): 840-845. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2007.06.013
[30]	张贵龙, 赵建宁, 宋晓龙, 等.施肥对土壤有机碳含量及碳库管理指数的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(2): 359-365. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKV20122013041700394695
[31]	王晶, 朱平, 张男, 等.施肥对黑土活性有机碳和碳库管理指数的研究[J].土壤通报, 2003, 34(5): 394-398. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2003.05.004

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1519) PDF downloads (1777)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Effect of fertilization on soil active organic carbon and carbon pool management index under maize/soybean intercropping condition

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content