Comprehensive evaluation of cold resistance of <i>Neolamarckia cadamba</i>

HUANG Hao; ZHOU Xiangbing; OUYANG Kunxi; LI Juncheng; ZENG Zhaojia; CHEN Xiaoyang

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.01.014

Journal of South China Agricultural University > 2016 > 37(1): 82-88. > DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.01.014

HUANG Hao, ZHOU Xiangbing, OUYANG Kunxi, LI Juncheng, ZENG Zhaojia, CHEN Xiaoyang. Comprehensive evaluation of cold resistance of Neolamarckia cadamba[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2016, 37(1): 82-88. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.01.014

Citation:

PDF (719 KB)

Comprehensive evaluation of cold resistance of Neolamarckia cadamba

1.
Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants, Nanning 530023, China
2.
College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University/ State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources/Guangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, Guangzhou 510642, China
3.
Jiulianshan Forest Farm of Guangdong, Heyuan 517100, China

More Information

Received Date: January 13, 2015
Available Online: May 17, 2023

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objective
This study aimed to lay a theoretical foundation for cold resistance breeding and to provide a technical support for artificial cultivation of Neolamarckia cadamba.
Method
After the branches of seven provenances were treated with artificially induced low temperature, the contents of methane dicarboxylic aldehyde(MDA), free proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein, the relative electrical conductivity (REC) as well as the branch recovery growth were measured. Using five indicators suitable for determination of cold resistance, combined with principal component analysis and membership function method, the cold resistance of different provenances was comprehensively evaluated.
Result
Under artificially induced low temperature stress(-2 ℃), the Longzhou provenance had the highest MDA content(35.24 μg·g^-1) and Baoshan had the lowest(21.19 μg·g^-1); Longzhou had the highest proline content (9.98 μg·g^-1) and Dehong had the lowest(6.13 μg·g^-1); Yunfu had the highest content of soluble sugar(79.66 μg·g^-1) and Jinghong had the lowest(65.32 μg·g^-1); Tianhe had the highest content of soluble protein(24.89 μg·g^-1) and Jinghong had the lowest(19.57 μg·g^-1); Baoshan had the highest REC (58.27%) and Yunfu had the lowest(48.37%); During the branch recovery growth, Yunfu had the highest branch bud survival rate(42.03%) and Jinghong had the lowest(3.88%). The integrated indices of cold resistance for seven provenances, Yunfu, Longzhou, Tianhe, Xingning, Jinghong, Baoshan and Dehong were 0.951, 0.863, 0.755, 0.728, 0.191, 0.151 and 0.132 respectively.
Conclusion
The cold resistance of Yunfu provenance was the strongest, followed by Longzhou, Tianhe, Xingning, Jinghong, Baoshan and Dehong. In general, the cold resistance of Guangdong or Guangxi provenance was stronger than that of Yunnan provenance.
- provenance,
- Neolamarckia cadamba,
- cold resistance,
- membership function method,
- principal component analysis

FullText(HTML)

References (45)

References

[1]	ENDO K, OSHIMA Y, KIKUCHI H, et al. Hypotensive principles of Uncaria hooks[J]. Planta Medica, 1983, 49(3): 188-190. doi: 10.1055-s-2007-969846/
[2]	徐英宝, 郑永光.广东城市林业优良树种及栽培技术[M].广州:广东科技出版社, 2005.
[3]	陈耀武, 管康林, 肖耀文.团花种子休眠和萌发生理的初步研究[J].植物生理学通讯, 1981(6): 28-31. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000004087199
[4]	任盘宇, 邹寿青.热带速生树种团花的造林技术[J].林业实用技术, 2004(6): 6-8. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lysyjs200406002
[5]	杨德军, 邱琼, 王达明, 等.团花育苗技术研究[J].广西林业科学, 2004, 33(2): 93-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2004.02.014
[6]	耿云芬, 邱琼, 杨德军.团花容器苗的育苗期施肥试验[J].西部林业科学, 2010, 39(1): 73-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8246.2010.01.014
[7]	黄浩. 黄梁木地理种源变异与再生体系的建立[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2014.
[8]	邹寿青.团花北移试种情况调查报告[J].热带植物研究, 1977(11): 26-35.
[9]	许明.团花引种试种初报[J].福建热作科技, 1979(4): 13-14. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000434132
[10]	郭本森.西双版纳团花绢螟的初步研究[J].林业科学, 1982, 18(1): 103-106. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000002184954
[11]	黄雅志, 裴汝康.咖啡旋皮天牛和幼龄团花树[J].云南热作科技, 1982(2): 41-44. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000004865489
[12]	韦宏.团花树皮的吲哚生物碱成分[J].广西科学院学报, 1999, 15(2): 52-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7378.1999.02.002
[13]	张雪. 锈毛千斤拔根及团花树皮化学成分研究[D]. 勐腊: 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园, 2008.
[14]	钟纪育, 王文端.团花树皮的化学成分[J].云南植物研究, 1990, 12(4): 453-456. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trcwyjykf201103001
[15]	林碧珍, 张树河, 林加耕.团花树组培快繁技术研究[J].中国热带农业, 2009(3): 46-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0658.2009.03.018
[16]	詹艳玲. 黄梁木(Neolamarckia cadamba (Roxb. ) Bosser)组织培养研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2010.
[17]	李娜. 团花树木葡聚糖转葡糖苷酶cDNA克隆及序列分析[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008.
[18]	马圣俊. 团花树形成层XET基因的克隆及功能初步分析[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2010.
[19]	欧阳昆唏. 黄梁木α扩展蛋白的基因克隆及功能研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2013.
[20]	云南省林科所.滇产团花木材性质和用途的研究[J].云南林业科技通讯, 1975(1): 1-4. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000004863975
[21]	王晶英.植物生理生化实验技术与原理[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社, 2003: 200.
[22]	李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000: 279.
[23]	吕跃东, 董凤祥, 王贵禧, 等.平欧杂交榛抗寒性综合评价体系的建立与应用[J].林业科学, 2008, 44(9): 31-35. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2008.09.006
[24]	何小勇. 翅荚木种源遗传多样性及其抗低温胁迫能力研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2007.
[25]	柳新红, 何小勇, 苏冬梅, 等.翅荚木种源抗寒性综合评价体系的构建与应用[J].林业科学, 2007, 43(10): 45-50. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx200710008
[26]	李勃, 刘成连, 杨瑞红, 等.樱桃砧木抗寒性鉴定[J].果树学报, 2006, 23(2): 196-199. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gskx200602010
[27]	朱根海, 刘祖祺, 朱培仁.应用Logistic方程确定植物组织低温半致死温度的研究[J].南京农业大学学报, 1986, 9(3): 11-16. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000002292411
[28]	盖钧镒.试验统计方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
[29]	宋锋惠, 史彦江, 吴正保, 等.枣树枝条的抗寒性测定分析[J].新疆农业科学, 2009, 46(6): 1212-1215. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xjnykx200906011
[30]	缴丽莉, 路丙社, 白志英, 等.四种园林树木抗寒性的比较分析[J].园艺学报, 2006, 33(3): 667-670. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2006.03.046
[31]	RAJIASHEKAR C. Membrerance strutral transition: Probable relation to frost damage in hardy herbaceous species[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1979: 255-274.
[32]	戴国俊, 王金玉, 杨建生, 等.应用统计软件SPSS拟合生长曲线方程[J].畜牧与兽医, 2006, 38(9): 28-30. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-5130.2006.09.009
[33]	董江水.应用SPSS软件拟合Logistic曲线研究[J].金陵科技学院学报, 2007, 23(1): 21-24. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/njnzxb200701005
[34]	李斌, 刘立强, 罗淑萍, 等.扁桃花芽的抗寒性测定与综合评价[J].经济林研究, 2012, 30(3): 16-21. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jjlyj201203004
[35]	许桂芳, 张朝阳, 向佐湘.利用隶属函数法对4种珍珠菜属植物的抗寒性综合评价[J].西北林学院学报, 2009, 24(3): 24-26. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xblxyxb200903006
[36]	郑元, 杨途熙, 魏安智, 等.低温胁迫对仁用杏几个抗寒生理指标的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(1): 163-167. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2008.01.029
[37]	柳新红, 何小勇, 袁德义.中国翅荚木[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 2009: 140.
[38]	陈晓阳, 沈熙环.林木育种学[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2005: 238.
[39]	周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 等.小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J].中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11): 1378-1382. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2003.11.026
[40]	吴行昶. 葡萄种质资源的抗寒性研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2011.
[41]	曹建东. 9个葡萄砧木和品种的抗寒性及耐盐性鉴定[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2010.
[42]	张昕欣. 蜡梅品种抗寒性研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2008.
[43]	相昆, 张美勇, 徐颖, 等.不同核桃品种耐寒特性综合评价[J].应用生态学报, 2011, 22(9): 2325-2330. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201109016
[44]	孙红梅. 早实核桃对低温和干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗逆性综合评价[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2012.
[45]	张钢.国外木本植物抗寒性测定方法综述[J].世界林业研究, 2005, 18(5): 14-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4241.2005.05.004

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1318) PDF downloads (2120)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Comprehensive evaluation of cold resistance of Neolamarckia cadamba

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content