YU Fei, HUA Lei, LI Jiyue, HE Qian, SU Yan. Effects of drought stress on water consumption characteristics of three Eucalyptus seedlings[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2015, 36(6): 98-103. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2015.06.016
    Citation: YU Fei, HUA Lei, LI Jiyue, HE Qian, SU Yan. Effects of drought stress on water consumption characteristics of three Eucalyptus seedlings[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2015, 36(6): 98-103. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2015.06.016

    Effects of drought stress on water consumption characteristics of three Eucalyptus seedlings

    More Information
    • Received Date: November 19, 2014
    • Available Online: May 17, 2023
    • Objective 

      The water consumption characteristics and their differences were estimated underdifferent soil water conditions to provide a guidance for culturing effectively seedlings.

      Method 

      The diurnal variation of water consumption (WC) and water consumption rate (WCR) of two kinds of Eucalyptusurophylla × E. grandis (DH33-27 and DH32-29) and E. grandis (H1) clonal seedlings in differentsoil moisture contents were measured using pot experiment, and the water use efficiency (WUE) wasmeasured using Li-6400 portable photosynthesis analysis system, respectively.

      Result and conclusion 

      The results showed that E. urophylla × E. grandis DH33-27 seedlings had the highest WC, (162.56 ±8.71) g·plant-1, among these three Eucalyptus seedlings. When subjected to serious drought, its WCvalue decreased to (10.83 ± 1.01) g·plant-1 which was the lowest. The similar variation trends of theWCR and WC were found: Two E. urophylla × E. grandis seedlings had high value under sufficient moisture and then decreased sharply under drought stress, but the average WCR of E. grandis still remained high. The diurnal change of WCR of these three Eucalyptus seedlings all followed the curve withone peak in different periods. The order of WUE of these three Eucalyptus seedlings was as follows: E.urophylla × E. grandis DH33-27 > E. urophylla × E. grandis DH32-29 > E. grandis. In conclusion, compared with E. urophylla × E. grandis DH32-29 and E. grandis, E. urophylla × E. grandis DH33-27 has higher photosynthesis and WUE, which is recommended to plant widely in both humid and arid regions.

    • [1]
      杨民胜, 吴志华, 陈少雄, 等.桉树的生态效益及其生态林经营[J].桉树科技, 2006, 23(1): 32-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3172.2006.01.007
      [2]
      BRITTO D S, PIROVANI C P, GONZALEZ E R, et al. Oxidative stress proteins as an indicator of a low quality of eucalyptus clones for the pulp and paper industry[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2012, 11(4): 3798-3813. doi: 10.4238/2012.August.17.13
      [3]
      YU F, HUANG X, DUAN C, et al. Eucalyptus trees-Ageratina adenophora complex system: A new eco-environmental protection model[J]. Clean-Soil Air Water, 2014, 42(5): 682-689. doi: 10.1002/clen.v42.5
      [4]
      ESHETU Y, OLAVI L. Indigenous woody species diversity in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. ssp. globulus plantations in the Ethiopian highlands[J]. Biodivers Conserv, 2003, 12(3): 567-582. doi: 10.1023/A:1022483700992
      [5]
      陈少雄.桉树人工林土壤养分现状与施肥研究[J].桉树科技, 2009, 26(1): 52-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3172.2009.01.011
      [6]
      于福科, 黄新会, 王克勤, 等.桉树人工林生态退化与恢复研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(2): 393-398. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj200902036
      [7]
      孙鹏森, 马履一.水源保护树种耗水特性研究与应用[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
      [8]
      苏建平, 康博文.我国树木蒸腾耗水研究进展[J].水土保持研究, 2004, 11(2): 177-179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3409.2004.02.057
      [9]
      郭孟霞, 毕华兴, 刘鑫, 等.树木蒸腾耗水研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学, 2006, 4(4): 114-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2006.04.022
      [10]
      王颖, 余瑞卿, 李湛东, 等.城市片林中常见树种的蒸腾耗水特性研究综述[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 26(3): 115-119. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nmgnydxxb200503028
      [11]
      茹桃勤, 李吉跃, 孔令省, 等.刺槐耗水研究进展[J].水土保持研究, 2005, 12(2): 135-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3409.2005.02.042
      [12]
      胡红玲, 张健, 胡庭兴, 等.不同土壤水分条件下三个速生用材树种幼树的耗水特性比较[J].自然资源学报, 2012, 27(12): 2071-2080. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.12.008
      [13]
      胡红玲. 巨桉耗水特性及其对干旱胁迫的响应[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012.
      [14]
      卢春英.闽西尾巨桉造林及其生长效果分析[J].福建林业科技, 2005, 32(2): 21-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2005.02.006
      [15]
      罗青红, 李志军.树木水分生理生态特性及抗旱性研究进展[J].塔里木大学学报, 2005, 17(2): 29-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0568.2005.02.011
      [16]
      AZAM G, MURRAY R S, GRANT C D, et al. Tolerance of young seedlings of Different tree species and a cereal to poor soil aeration[J]. Soil Res, 2014, 52(8): 751-759. doi: 10.1071/SR13219
      [17]
      邱权, 潘昕, 李吉跃, 等.速生树种尾巨桉和竹柳幼苗耗水特性和水分利用效率[J].生态学报, 2014, 34 (6): 1401-1410. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201406008
      [18]
      张雪海, 李吉跃, 刘娟娟, 等. CO2倍增与干旱胁迫交互作用对幼树蒸腾耗水日变化的影响[J].广东林业科技, 2009, 25(2): 1-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2009.02.001
      [19]
      PENUELAS J, FILELLA I, Llusià J, et al. Comparative field study of spring and summer leaf gas exchange and photobiology of the mediterranean trees Quercus ilex and Phillyrea latifolia[J]. J Exp Bot, 1998, 49(319): 229- 238. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=JJ021249173
      [20]
      SALIENDRA N Z, SPETTY J S, COMSTOCK J P. Influence of leaf water status on stomatal responses to humidity, hydraulic conductance and soil drought in Betula occideratalis[J]. Planta, 1995, 196(2): 357-366.
      [21]
      HIROMI T. NINOMIYA I, KOIKE T, et al. Regulation of transpiration by patchy stomatal opening in canopy tree species of Dipterocarpaceae in tropical rain forest, Sarawak, Malaysia[J]. Jpn J Ecol, 1999, 49(2): 83-90.
      [22]
      奚如春, 马履一, 王瑞辉, 等.林木耗水调控机理研究进展[J].生态学杂志, 2006, 25(6): 692-697. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2006.06.020
      [23]
      李吉跃, 朱妍.干旱胁迫对北京城市绿化树种耗水特性的影响[J].北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(S1): 32- 37. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200601952580
      [24]
      朱妍, 李吉跃, 史剑波.北京六个绿化树种盆栽蒸腾耗水量的比较研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28 (1): 65-70. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2006.01.012
      [25]
      何茜. 毛白杨抗旱节水优良无性系评价与筛选[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10022-2008085056.htm
      [26]
      陈博. 珍贵树种楸树优良无性系评价与筛选[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2012.
      [27]
      马履一, 王瑞辉, 徐军亮, 等.北京市主要园林绿化植物耗水性及节水灌溉制度研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 2009: 5.
      [28]
      董蕾, 陈博, 李吉跃, 等. 5个楸树无性系抗旱性的综合评价[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(4): 30-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2014.04.007
      [29]
      邱权, 何茜, 李吉跃, 等.干旱胁迫对华南地区三种苗木蒸腾耗水的影响[J].广东林业科技, 2012, 28(1): 19-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2012.01.004
      [30]
      华雷, 何茜, 李吉跃, 等.桉树无性系和华南乡土树种秋枫苗木耗水特性的比较[J].应用生态学报, 2014, 25(6): 1639-1644. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201406013

    Catalog

      SU Yan

      1. On this Site
      2. On Google Scholar
      3. On PubMed
      Article views (1428) PDF downloads (1613) Cited by()

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return