SANG Song, WANG Peidan, CAO Yuke, ZHONG Guohua. A study on Margarya melanioides and Cipangopaludina chinensis as the indicator organisms to monitor pesticide residues in a tea garden environment[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2014, 35(3): 58-62. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2014.03.011
    Citation: SANG Song, WANG Peidan, CAO Yuke, ZHONG Guohua. A study on Margarya melanioides and Cipangopaludina chinensis as the indicator organisms to monitor pesticide residues in a tea garden environment[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2014, 35(3): 58-62. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2014.03.011

    A study on Margarya melanioides and Cipangopaludina chinensis as the indicator organisms to monitor pesticide residues in a tea garden environment

    More Information
    • Received Date: October 03, 2013
    • 【Objective】To determine the sensitivity of Margarya melanioides and Cipangopaludina chinensis to pesticides used commonly in tea cultivation to explore the feasibility of Margarya melanioides and Cipangopaludina chinensis as the organisms to monitor pesticide residues in a tea garden.【Method】The lethal concentration 50(LC50) values of five insecticides and one herbicide to M.melanioides and C.chinensis were determined by static bioassay tests respectively.【Result and conclusion】The LC50 values of dichlorvos, fenpropathrin, abamectin, chlorpyrifos, glufosinate-ammonium and thiamethoxam to M.melanioides were 0.031 6, 0.005 2, 0.104 0,0.048 6, 14.417 1, 54.635 9 mg·kg-1 respectively, and to C. chinensis were 1.711 2, 0.013 2, 0.917 1, 1.501 6, 108.755 3, 119.021 1 mg·kg-1 respectively after 48 h treatment, which indicated that the sensitivity of M. melanioides to these pesticides were 54.15, 2.54, 8.82, 30.90, 7.54 and 2.18 times over C.chinensis, respectively. M.melanioides was more sensitive than C.chinensis to these six pesticides, especially to organophosphorus (dichlorvos and chlorpyrifos). The LC50 values of dichlorvos, chlorpyrifos and fenpropathrin were far below the maximum residue limit (MRL), which indicated that the tested M.melanioides might have the potential to be the indicator organism to monitor pyrethroids and organophosphorus insecticide residues in tea garden.
    • Cited by

      Periodical cited type(15)

      1. 邱裕丰,唐荣贵,沈玉叶,陈有超,刘益宏,蔡延江. 不同密度蚯蚓对毛竹林土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响. 应用生态学报. 2025(03): 819-827 .
      2. 肖远业,张守涛,张孟豪,钟鹤森,许炜晴,李馨妤,毛润乾,张池. 光伏-蚯蚓模式与有机物料施用对土壤质量的影响. 应用生态学报. 2025(04): 995-1002 .
      3. 张香凝,史福刚,李太魁,郭战玲,寇长林. 接种蚯蚓对有机茶园土壤结构及有机碳库的影响. 生态学报. 2024(04): 1747-1754 .
      4. 曾海琪,宋书巧,赵婷. 淋溶作用下桉树浸提液单宁对赤红壤铁形态影响. 环境科学学报. 2024(06): 395-403 .
      5. 王玉霞,张建云,房慧勇,郑玉光,马东来,谷仙. 蚯蚓肥中养分、微生物群落及抑菌功能研究——以华北平原牛粪堆肥为例. 中国农业大学学报. 2024(09): 135-146 .
      6. 裴诗宇,杨家伟,吴彬,赵叶新,叶成龙,胡水金. 接种蚯蚓和腐解菌对秸秆腐解及土壤矿物结合有机碳形成的影响. 江苏农业学报. 2024(08): 1424-1433 .
      7. 张雪莲,王国兵,徐晓. 不同生态类型蚯蚓对土壤团聚体有机碳质量分数的影响. 东北林业大学学报. 2023(01): 101-105 .
      8. 沈松蓉,陈云,康茜琳,向媛羚,耿育红,张伟,韩颖. 寡氧单胞菌、水稻秸秆和蚯蚓协同修复Cr(Ⅵ)污染土壤. 农业环境科学学报. 2023(11): 2440-2452 .
      9. 陈静,张孟豪,杨倩楠,张晓龙,王超,张池,刘科学. 蚯蚓改良水浇地土壤入渗性能及影响因素分析. 福建农业学报. 2023(11): 1367-1375 .
      10. 郭澎,诸莉燕,柳开楼,付责,张行健,罗朝晖,毕利东. 红壤区不同母质对水稻土土壤团聚体稳定性的影响. 广东农业科学. 2022(03): 77-85 .
      11. 王鑫格,李娜,许宜平,韩颖楠,饶凯锋,马梅. 基于有机污染物生物有效性的土壤环境质量基准的探讨. 生态毒理学报. 2022(01): 32-46 .
      12. 张维兰,张悦,刘萍,段昌群,刘嫦娥. 蚯蚓在植物修复重金属污染土壤中的研究进展. 环境科学与技术. 2022(08): 155-165 .
      13. 陈静,陈金洁,杨倩楠,Cevin Tibihenda,李祥东,张晓龙,王超,张池,刘科学. 蚯蚓生态类型和密度对水浇地土壤综合质量的影响. 南方农业学报. 2022(07): 1899-1907 .
      14. 刘嫦娥,岳敏慧,谭辉林,张悦,张维兰,肖艳兰,潘瑛,段昌群. 纳米零价铁(nZVI)对蚯蚓-微生物-土壤生态系统的毒性效应研究. 中国生态农业学报(中英文). 2021(10): 1722-1732 .
      15. 张宇,蒋代华,黄金兰,王明释,邓华为. 粉垄耕作对赤红壤团聚体粒级分布和稳定性的影响. 生态学杂志. 2021(12): 3922-3932 .

      Other cited types(7)

    Catalog

      ZHONG Guohua

      1. On this Site
      2. On Google Scholar
      3. On PubMed
      Article views (1591) PDF downloads (2176) Cited by(22)
      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return