Citation: | HAO Jia, LIU Yuhang, YIN Jie, et al. Effects of different phosphorus concentrations on soil physicochemical property, growth and medicinal materials quality of Saposhnikovia divaricata[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2022, 43(3): 59-67. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202104024 |
To discuss the effects of different phosphorus concentrations on soil characteristics, growth status and chromone content of Saposhnikovia divaricata, and provide theoretical basis for technical strategy formulation of S. divaricata artificial cultivation and responding mechanism research of S. divaricata to low phosphorus stress.
Two-year-old S. divaricata was used as material, and three phosphorus treatments with NH4H2PO4 concentration of 1.0, 0.1 and 0 (no phosphorus) mmol/L respectively were set up. The soil physical and chemical properties, and the growth characteristics and total contents of four kinds of chromones inS. divaricata were determined on the 30th, 60th, and 90th day to analyze the correlativity between the various indicators and total chromone content under different phosphorus concentrations.
The root diameter and weight of 2-year-old S. divaricata in no phosphorus treatment were lower than those of 1.0 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatment during the whole treatment period, and the root length after 90 d of treatment was significantly higher than those of 1.0 and 0.1 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatments. After 60 d of treatment, the soil pH of 1.0 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatment was significantly higher than those of 0.1 mmol·L−1 and no phosphorus treatments. The contents of soil organic matter in 1.0 and 0.1 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatments were significantly lower than that in no phosphorus treatment during the whole treatment period. After 90 d of treatment, the alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content in soil of no phosphorus treatment was significantly higher than those of 1.0 and 0.1 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatments, whereas the available phosphorus content in soil of 0.1 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatment was significantly higher than that of no phosphorus treatment, the total content of four chromones of 0.1 mmol·L−1 and no phosphorus treatments were significantly higher than that of 1.0 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatment. On the 30 th day of treatment, the activities of acid phosphatase in soil among three treatments were significantly different. There were positive correlations between root diameter/root fresh biomass and chromone content in 1.0 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatment, between alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content/available phosphorus content/root fresh biomass and chromone content in 0.1 mmol·L−1 phosphorus treatment, between pH/alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen content /acid phosphate activity and chromone content in no phosphorus treatment, respectively.
S. divaricata has a series of response mechanisms to phosphorus stress, including chromone content significantly increasing, synergistic interaction of pH, organic matter, alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and acid phosphatase, which ensures the absorption and utilization of nutrients by S. divaricata.
[1] |
陈敏旺. 吉林省农田耕层土壤速效氮磷钾养分的时空变化特征[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2018.
|
[2] |
张智猛, 戴良香, 张电学, 等. 施磷对土壤有效磷含量、吸磷特性及小麦产量的影响[J]. 河北农业技术师范学院学报, 1999, 1(1): 12-16.
|
[3] |
裴洲洋, 陈油鸿, 江春, 等. 不同施肥结构对土壤理化性质及烤烟氮、磷、钾含量的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2016, 22(21): 35-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2016.21.014
|
[4] |
张烨. 低磷胁迫诱导植物酸性磷酸酶的分子调控机制[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014.
|
[5] |
国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典: Ⅰ部[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2020: 156.
|
[6] |
韩忠明, 王云贺, 胥苗苗, 等. 干旱胁迫对防风生理特性及品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(11): 100-106.
|
[7] |
孙晖, 曹玲, 王喜军. 防风药效物质基础季节积累规律的研究[J]. 中国中医药科技, 2003, 10(6): 355-356. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7072.2003.06.019
|
[8] |
韩忠明, 胥苗苗, 王云贺, 等. 干旱胁迫对防风叶片保护酶活性、渗透调节物质含量及药材品质的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2016, 37(6): 91-97. doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.06.014
|
[9] |
胥苗苗. 水分胁迫对防风质量、生理生态特性及关键酶活性影响[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2016.
|
[10] |
黄艳茹, 任晓蕾, 霍金海, 等. 影响防风质量因素的研究概况[J]. 中医药信息, 2017, 34(6): 134-138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2406.2017.06.038
|
[11] |
郭旭, 田新, 郝佳, 等. 不同产地防风色原酮含量与土壤因子的关系[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 30-37. doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201912004
|
[12] |
邵畅畅, 韦小丽, 周紫晶, 等. 供磷水平对棕榈幼苗生长及根系形态的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(1): 12-15.
|
[13] |
张文献, 李增强, 胡亚丽, 等. 不同浓度磷胁迫对大豆幼苗生长及根系DNA甲基化水平的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(12): 9-18. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.12.02
|
[14] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[15] |
关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986.
|
[16] |
韩忠明, 王云贺, 李轶雯, 等. 防风色原酮微波辅助提取及含量动态变化研究[J]. 中药材, 2011, 34(3): 465-468.
|
[17] |
梁霞, 刘爱琴, 马祥庆, 等. 磷胁迫对不同杉木无性系酸性磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(1): 54-59. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2005.01.008
|
[18] |
唐荣莉, 王春萍, 王红娟, 等. 低磷胁迫对辣椒苗期生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(9): 1933-1942.
|
[19] |
王斐. 有机结合态磷对土壤微生物、玉米生长及磷素利用率的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2013.
|
[20] |
余健. 磷胁迫下林木分泌的有机酸及对土壤磷的活化[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2005.
|
[21] |
王庆仁, 李继云, 李振声. 植物高效利用土壤难溶态磷研究动态及展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 4(2): 107-116. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.1998.02.003
|
[22] |
刘晓霞. 苹果园土壤磷库特征及土壤磷含量和磷源对磷吸收的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018.
|
[23] |
谢安强, 洪伟, 吴承祯, 等. 内生真菌对低磷胁迫下尾巨桉生理及土壤特性的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2013, 33(3): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2013.03.001
|
[24] |
CHEN H, LI D, XIAO K, et al. Soil microbial processes and resource limitation in karst and non‐karst forests[J]. Functional Ecology, 2018, 32(5): 1400-1409. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13069
|
[25] |
李荣坦. 低磷胁迫对番茄根系生长及根际土壤微生物多样性的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2016.
|
[26] |
徐静, 张锡洲, 李廷轩, 等. 野生大麦对土壤磷吸收及其酸性磷酸酶活性的基因型差异[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1): 88-98. doi: 10.11686/cyxb20150112
|
[27] |
郭轶敏, 文亦芾, 史亮涛, 等. 土壤磷水平对柱花草株高、根长及生物量的影响[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2014(1): 1-4.
|
[28] |
LIU Y, MI G, CHEN F, et al. Rhizosphere effect and root growth of two maize ( Zea mays L. ) genotypes with contrasting P efficiency at low P availability[J]. Plant Science, 2004, 167(2): 217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.02.026
|
[29] |
王鑫, 郭平毅, 原向阳, 等. 2, 4−D丁酯对罂粟(Papaver somniferum L.)保护酶活性及脂质过氧化作用的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(3): 1098-1103. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.03.024
|