白毫早和乌牛早茶园卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲优势种天敌的差异

李尚; 王振兴; 王建盼; 周夏芝; 毕守东; 覃盛; 陈云; 刘飞飞; 邹运鼎; 郎坤

doi:10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2016.04.007

白毫早和乌牛早茶园卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲优势种天敌的差异

李尚^1,,
王振兴²,
王建盼²,
周夏芝^1, ,,
毕守东^2, ,,
覃盛²,
陈云²,
刘飞飞²,
邹运鼎¹,
郎坤²

1.
安徽农业大学林学与园林学院，安徽合肥 230036
2.
安徽农业大学理学院，安徽合肥 230036

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 30871444

安徽省自然科学基金 11040606M71

详细信息

作者简介:
李尚(1992—), 男, 硕士研究生, E-mail:13083199902@163.com

通讯作者:
周夏芝(1973—)女, 副教授, 硕士, E-mail:zhouxz@ahau.edu.cn

毕守东(1963—), 男, 教授, 博士, E-mail:bishoudong@163.com

中图分类号: Q968.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 1564
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 1512
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-12-16
- 网络出版日期: 2023-05-17
- 刊出日期: 2016-07-09

Differences of dominant natural enemies of Monolepta hieroglyphica and Brevipalpus obovatus in Baihaozao and Wuniuzao tea gardens

1.
School of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
2.
School of Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China

摘要

摘要:
目的
明确白毫早和乌牛早茶园卵形短须螨Monolepta hieroglyphica和双斑长跗萤叶甲Brevipalpus obovatus的优势种天敌。
方法
采用平行跳跃法, 在茶园随机选取30个样方, 调查并记录害虫及天敌物种数和个体数; 应用灰色关联度和生态位分析法分析茶园中2种主要害虫卵形短须螨、双斑长跗萤叶甲与11种天敌在数量、时间和空间上的关系。
结果
白毫早茶园卵形短须螨前6位优势种天敌分别是三突花蟹蛛Misumenops tricuspidatus、鳞纹肖蛸Tetragnatha squamata、草间小黑蛛Erigonidium graminicolum、八点球腹蛛Theridion octomaculatum、斜纹猫蛛Clubiona japonicola和粽管巢蛛Oxyopes sertatus, 乌牛早茶园分别是鳞纹肖蛸、广大腿小蜂Brachymeria obscurata、三突花蟹蛛、茶色新圆蛛Neoscona theisi、锥腹肖蛸Tetragnatha maxillosa和草间小黑蛛, 相同天敌比率为50%。白毫早茶园双斑长跗萤叶甲前6位优势种天敌是八点球腹蛛、草间小黑蛛、鳞纹肖蛸、粽管巢蛛、广大腿小蜂和茶色新圆蛛, 乌牛早茶园分别是草间小黑蛛、锥腹肖蛸、鳞纹肖蛸、茶色新圆蛛、广大腿小蜂和粽管巢蛛, 相同天敌比率为83.33%。
结论
天敌的累计相同比率随着天敌种类的增加而增加, 表明茶树品种对卵形短须螨优势种天敌的影响大于对双斑长跗萤叶甲的。
- 白毫早茶园 /
- 乌牛早茶园 /
- 卵形短须螨 /
- 双斑长跗萤叶甲 /
- 优势天敌
Abstract:
Objective
To determine the dominant natural enemies of Monolepta hieroglyphica and Brevipalpus obovatus in Baihaozao and Wuniuzao tea gardens.
Method
A total of 30 quadrats were randomly selected in Baihaozao and Wuniuzao tea gardens using parallel jumping method.The numbers of species of pests and their natural enemies, and individuals of each species were recorded.Grey correlation degree method and niche analysis method were applied to analyze the relationships between two pest species, M.hieroglyphica and B.obovatus, and eleven species of natural enemies in quantity, occurring time and space.
Result
The top six species of natural enemies of M.hieroglyphica in Baihaozao tea garden were Misumenops tricuspidatus, Tetragnatha squamata, Erigonidium graminicolum, Theridion octomaculatum, Clubiona japonicola and Oxyopes sertatus, and in Wuniuzao tea garden were T.squamata, Brachymeria obscurata, M.tricuspidatus, Neoscona theisi, Tetragnatha maxillosa and E.graminicolum.The overlapping natural enemies between two tea gardens accounted for 50% of the total.The top six natural enemies of B.obovatus in Baihaozao tea garden were T.octomaculatum, E.graminicolum, T.squamata, O.sertatus, B.obscurata and N.theisi, and in Wuniuzao tea garden were E.graminicolum, T.maxillosa, T.squamata, N.theisi, B.obscurata and O.sertatus.The overlapping natural enemies between two tea gardens accounted for 83.33% of the total.
Conclusion
The cumulative ratio of overlapping natural enemies between two tea gardens increases as the number of species of natural enemies increases.The influences of tea tree varieties on dominant natural enemies are higher for M.hieroglyphica compared to B.obovatus.
- Baihaozao tea garden /
- Wuniuzao tea garden /
- Monolepta hieroglyphica /
- Brevipalpus obovatus /
- dominant natural enemy

HTML全文

表 1 白毫早和乌牛早茶园卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲及其天敌种群动态¹⁾

Table 1 Dynamics of the numbers of Monolepta hieroglyphica, Brevipalpus obovatus and their natural enemies in Baihaozao and Wuniuzao tea gardens

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 白毫早和乌牛早茶园卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲与其主要天敌的关联度¹⁾

Table 2 Correlation degrees between Monolepta hieroglyphica and Brevipalpus obovatus and their natural enemies in Baihaozao and Wuniuzao tea gardens

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲与其天敌时间上的Horn’s生态位重叠指数(H)和Morisita相似性比例(M) ¹⁾

Table 3 The time niche overlap indices represented as Horn's indices (H) and proportional similarities represented as Morisita indices (M) of Monolepta hieroglyphica and Brevipalpus obovatus and their natural enemies

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲与其天敌的空间上的Horn’s生态位重叠指数(H)和Morisita相似性比例(M) ¹⁾

Table 4 The spatial niche overlap indices represented as Horn's indices (H) and proportional similarities represented as Morisita indices (M) of Monolepta hieroglyphica and Brevipalpus obovatus and their natural enemies

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 白毫早茶园卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲与其天敌关系的密切指数¹⁾

Table 5 Correlation indices of Monolepta hieroglyphica and Brevipalpus obovatus and their natural enemies in Baihaozao tea garden

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 乌牛早茶园卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲与其天敌关系的密切指数¹⁾

Table 6 Correlation indices of Monolepta hieroglyphica and Brevipalpus obovatus and their natural enemies in Wuniuzao tea garden

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 白毫早和乌牛早茶园卵形短须螨和双斑长跗萤叶甲前6位优势种天敌比较

Table 7 Comparisons of the top six dominant natural enemies of Monolepta hieroglyphica and Brevipalpus obovatus in Baihaozao and Wuniuzao tea gardens

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	张汉鹄, 谭济才.中国茶树害虫及其无公害治理[M].合肥:安徽科学技术出版社, 2004:49-51.
[2]	王宏毅.卵形短须螨为害西番莲研究[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 31(3):320-323. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/fjnydxxb200203012
[3]	朱梅, 侯柏华, 吴伟南, 等.茶园螨类调查及利用胡瓜钝绥螨控制卵形短须螨的初步研究[J].环境昆虫学报, 2010, 32(2):204-209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2010.02.010
[4]	聂强, 孙强.双斑萤叶甲成虫的取食选择性研究[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2009, 21(4):38-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2090.2009.04.010
[5]	王立仁, 刘斌侠, 付泓.玉米田双斑长跗萤叶甲的发生为害情况与防治对策[J].陕西农业科学, 2006(2):123-131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2006.02.060
[6]	李广伟, 陈秀琳, 张建萍, 等.温度对双斑长跗萤叶甲成虫寿命及繁殖的影响[J].昆虫知识, 2010, 47(2):322-325. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kczs201002016
[7]	梁日霞, 王振营, 何康来, 等.基于线粒体COⅡ基因序列的双斑长跗萤叶甲中国北方地理种群的遗传多样性研究[J].昆虫学报, 2011, 54(7):828-837. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kcxb201107013
[8]	郑龙章, 张春霞, 黄森慰.茶农使用农药行为影响因素实证研究:以福建省为例[J].福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2009, 12(2):44-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6922.2009.02.010
[9]	邹运鼎.害虫管理中的天敌评价理论与应用[M].北京.中国林业出版社, 1997:27-90.
[10]	SINU P A.Avian pest control in tea plantations of sub-Himalayan plains of Northeast India:Mixed-species foraging flock matters[J].Biol Control, 2011, 58(3):362-366. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.05.019
[11]	CHEN L L, YOU M S, CHEN S B.Effects of cover crops on spider communities in tea plantations[J].Biol Control, 2011, 59(3):326-335. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.09.007
[12]	姚国坤.中国名优茶地图[M].上海:上海文化出版社, 2013:84-85.
[13]	徐海荣.中国茶事大典[M].北京:华夏出版社, 2000:200-201.
[14]	刘思峰, 谢乃明.灰色系统理论及其应用[M].6版.北京:科学出版社, 2013:48-87.
[15]	郭骅, 周夏芝, 毕守东, 等.茶园黑刺粉虱和茶叶甲成虫与其捕食性天敌之间的关系[J]华南农业大学学报, 2013, 34(3):345-351. http://xuebao.scau.edu.cn/zr/hnny_zr/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?flag=1&file_no=201303013&journal_id=hnny_zr
[16]	FU W G, WANG F K, YIN Q L, et al.Niche dynamics of species in succession process in the wetland of Yangtze Rivers lower reach, China[J].Plant Ecol Evol, 2015, 148 (1):43-51. doi: 10.5091/plecevo
[17]	TAKADA Y.Morisita's prosperity index revisited[J].Biodivers Conserv, 2015, 24(8):2093-2097. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0933-5
[18]	OLLERTON J, STOTT A, ALLNUTT E, et al.Pollination niche overlap between a parasitic plant and its host[J].Oecologia, 2007, 151(3):473-485. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0605-y
[19]	邓欣, 谭济才.生态控制茶园内害虫、天敌种类及数量的季节变化规律[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(7):1166-1172. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2002.07.028
[20]	韩宝瑜.三类典型茶园昆虫和螨类群落组成和动态的差异[J].茶叶科学, 2005, 25(4):249-254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-369X.2005.04.003
[21]	柯胜兵, 党凤花, 毕守东, 等.不同海拔茶园害虫、天敌种群及其群落结构差异[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(14):4161-4168. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201114033
[22]	陈亦根, 熊锦君, 黄明度, 等.复合茶园昆虫类群多样性和稳定性研究[J].华南农业大学学报, 2004, 25 (1):59-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2004.01.016