融合多元数据的PRRSV时空风险预测框架研究

    A spatiotemporal risk prediction framework for PRRSV based on multimodal data integration

    • 摘要:
      目的 提出并验证一种融合流行病学、环境因子与系统发育动力学数据的猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus,PRRSV)时空风险预测框架,以弥补现有传播风险模型在动态捕捉和风险梯度量化方面的不足。
      方法 构建多维特征体系,并以连续型风险评分(risk_score)统一量化省份−月份尺度的传播风险;采用经典基线模型(Gradient boosting)、传统机器学习模型(SVR、SVR-L、XGBoost)和深度学习模型(LSTM、Transformer)开展对比试验,并通过分省交叉验证和滚动时间窗口验证模型性能。
      结果 与传统二分类标签模型相比,采用连续型风险评分的框架的平均绝对误差(MAE)降低67.6%。系统发育/传播特征和历史特征分别是模型性能的核心信息来源,二者可恢复全特征模型93.6%和90.3%的预测性能。随着训练数据比例增加并引入工程化特征,Transformer模型MAE由0.39降至0.18以下;LSTM模型MAE稳定下降,误差波动范围收窄。在各省份的验证中,XGBoost和Gradient boosting表现出较强全局稳健性,LSTM和Transformer在河南、山东等省份表现出较好的区域适配性。
      结论 该时空风险预测框架能够提升PRRSV传播风险预测精度和小样本数据利用效率,为PRRSV及其他动物疫病的精准防控提供可推广的方法学参考。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To propose and validate a spatiotemporal risk prediction framework for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) by integrating epidemiological data, environmental factors, and phylodynamic data, thereby addressing the limitations of existing transmission risk models in dynamically capturing transmission processes and quantifying risk gradients.
      Method A multidimensional feature system was constructed, and a continuous risk score (risk_score) was used to consistently quantify transmission risk at the “province-month” scale. Comparative experiments were performed using a classical baseline model (Gradient boosting), traditional machine learning models (SVR, SVR-L, and XGBoost), and deep learning models (LSTM and Transformer). Model performance was further evaluated by province-wise cross-validation and rolling time-window validation.
      Result Compared with the conventional binary-label model, the framework based on the continuous risk score reduced the mean absolute error (MAE) by 67.6%. Phylodynamic/transmission features and historical features were identified as the principal sources of information contributing to model performance, recovering 93.6% and 90.3% of the predictive performance of the full-feature model, respectively. As the proportion of training data increased and engineered features were introduced, the MAE of the Transformer model decreased from 0.39 to below 0.18. The MAE of the LSTM model also declined steadily, with a narrower range of error fluctuations. In province-level validation, XGBoost and Gradient boosting exhibited strong overall robustness, whereas LSTM and Transformer showed better regional adaptability in provinces such as Henan and Shandong.
      Conclusion The proposed spatiotemporal risk prediction framework improves the accuracy of PRRSV transmission risk prediction and enhances the utilization efficiency of small-sample data, providing a generalizable methodological reference for the precise prevention and control of PRRSV and other animal infectious diseases.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回