绿色高效栽培技术对粤北地区优质稻产量、品质和氮肥利用效率的影响

    Effect of green and high-efficiency management practice on grain yield, quality, and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency of high-quality rice in North Guangdong

    • 摘要:
      目的 绿色高效栽培技术基于氮磷减施增效和硅肥增施稳产等关键技术而集成建立,明确该技术对优质稻产量、品质和氮肥利用效率的影响以及在不同品种、不同种植季节中的表现,为其推广应用提供科学依据。
      方法 大田试验于2023—2024年在广东省韶关市曲江区和乳源瑶族自治县进行,其中双季稻采用随机区组设计,设置3种栽培技术和5个优质稻品种;单季稻栽培技术优化采用裂区设计,优质稻品种为主区,栽培技术为副区,设置2种栽培技术和2个优质稻品种。
      结果 与农民习惯栽培技术相比,双季稻模式下,绿色高效栽培技术的早季产量无显著差异,晚季显著增产10.3%;5个优质稻品种中有3个在早季增产,晚季则全部增产;绿色高效栽培技术的氮肥农学利用率、氮肥偏生产力和磷肥偏生产力在早季比农民习惯栽培技术分别显著提高33.0%、25.4%和97.6%,晚季分别显著提高63.9%、31.5%和114.9%。单季稻模式下,绿色高效栽培技术在2023年和2024年分别比农民习惯栽培技术显著增产11.9%和15.6%,氮肥偏生产力显著提高33.1%和34.6%,磷肥偏生产力显著提高155.3%和40.4%。3个供试品种在绿色高效栽培技术下均比农民习惯栽培技术增产,其中2个品种(‘19香’和‘泰丰优208’)达显著水平。与农民习惯栽培技术相比,绿色高效栽培技术显著提高单季稻精米率和粒长,显著降低直链淀粉含量和碱消值,而双季早、晚稻的米质性状在农民习惯栽培技术和绿色高效栽培技术间均无显著差异。
      结论 绿色高效栽培技术稳产增效表现良好,在不同品种、种植季节和年份间表现稳定,具备在粤北稻作区双、单季稻作模式下扩大应用的潜力。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective Green and high-efficiency management practice (GHP) is integrated and established based on nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer reduction and efficiency enhancement, as well as silicon application for improving yield stability. To clarify the effects of GHP on grain yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency of high-quality rice, as well as the performance of this technology in different varieties and different planting seasons, and provide a scientific basis for the large-scale popularization and application.
      Method Field experiments were conducted from 2023 to 2024 in Qujiang District and Ruyuan Yao Autonomous County of Shaoguan City in Guangdong Province. For double-season rice, the optimization experiments followed a completely randomized block design, testing three cropping managements and five high-quality rice varieties. For single-season rice, the optimization experiments of cultivation techniques were laid out in split-plot design with high-quality rice variety as the main plot and cropping management as the subplot, testing two cropping managements and two high-quality rice varieties.
      Result For double-season rice, the grain yield under GHP and farmer’s conventional management practice (FP) were comparable in the early season, whereas the grain yield of GHP was significantly higher than that of FP by 10.3% in the late season. Among the five high-quality rice varieties, three of them achieved higher yields under GHP in the early season, while all of them showed increased yields under GHP in the late season. Agronomic use efficiency of applied N fertilizer, partial factor productivity of applied N fertilizer (PFPN), and partial factor productivity of applied P fertilizer (PFPP) under GHP were 33.0%, 25.4%, and 97.6% significantly higher than those of FP in the early season, and 63.9%, 31.5%, and 114.9% significantly higher than those of FP in the late season, respectively. For single-season rice, compared with FP, GHP significantly increased grain yield, PFPN, and PFPP by 11.9%, 33.1%, and 155.3% in 2023, and by 15.6%, 34.6%, and 40.4% in 2024, respectively. Three high-quality rice varieties showed increased yields under GHP, with the differences being significant between GHP and FP for ‘19Xiang’ and ‘Taifengyou 208’. In comparison with FP, GHP significantly increased milled rice rate and grain length, and decreased amylose content and alkali extinction value in the single season, but no significant difference was observed between FP and GHP in the early and late seasons of double-season cropping pattern.
      Conclusion GHP consistently improves yield stability, nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies across varieties, cropping seasons and years, and can be widely used in double- and single-season rice cropping systems in North Guangdong rice-growing area.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回