景观建设对流溪河流域土壤微生物群落结构的影响

    Effects of landscape construction on soil microbial community structure in the Liuxi River Basin

    • 摘要:
      目的 以城市化进程中河岸带生态系统功能退化为背景,聚焦流溪河生态保护区的绿色空间景观工程建设,旨在探究景观建设后对林草地土壤微生物群落的影响。
      方法 基于Illumina MiSeq高通量测序技术,结合土壤理化性质测定,系统分析了景观建设前后的土壤微生物群落结构特征变化及与土壤环境因子的相互关系。
      结果 景观建设提高了林草地土壤有机质(SOM)、全氮(TN)和有效磷(AP)含量,增强了脱氢酶(DHA)活性,降低了土壤速效钾(AP)含量和脲酶(UE)活性,其中,土壤SOM含量(增幅15.51%和26.49%)和DHA活性(增幅213.11%和301.44%)增幅达到显著水平(P<0.05)。景观建设后,土壤细菌群落优势属以norank_f__Xanthobacteraceaenorank_f__norank_o__Vicinamibacteralesnorank_f__norank_o__Gaiellales为主,真菌则以Saitozyma、unclassified_k__Fungi、Mortierella为主,林地土壤细菌的Shannon指数显著提高(P<0.05),林草地的土壤细菌和真菌Chao1指数及草地的Shannon指数变化不显著((P>0.05);土壤微生物Nestedness指数呈下降趋势,且与Turnover指数和总β−多样性指数一样变化均不显著(P>0.05)。景观建设后,草地和林地植被之间的细菌和真菌群落共现性网络平均度提高但模块化降低,表明微生物间的相互作用更复杂、其功能单元间的协作性增强。
      结论 景观建设通过改善土壤理化环境和酶促过程,间接调节了细菌与真菌群落结构,使其与土壤养分、酶活性之间的关系更加紧密和稳定。人工干预的景观建设在一定程度上优化了土壤生态系统功能网络,提升生态系统修复能力,为流溪河流域河岸带的生态恢复和健康维护提供科学依据。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective This study was conducted against the background of functional degradation of riparian ecosystems during urbanization, focusing on the construction of green space landscape projects in the Liuxi River Ecological Protection Area. The aim was to explore the mechanisms by which landscape construction influences soil microorganisms in grassland and woodland ecosystems.
      Method Based on Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology combined with measurements of soil physicochemical properties, we systematically analyzed the changes in soil microbial community structure before and after landscape construction and their relationships with soil environmental factors.
      Result The results showed that: (1) Landscape construction increased Soil Organic Matter, Total Nitrogen, and Available Phosphorus contents and enhanced Dehydrogenase activity, and decreased Available Potassium content and Urease activity in both grassland and woodland soils. Among these, the increases in Soil Organic Matter content (by 15.51% and 26.49%) and Dehydrogenase activity (by 213.11% and 301.44%) were statistically significant (P < 0.05) for grassland and woodland, respectively. (2) After landscape construction, the dominant bacterial genera were norank_f__Xanthobacteraceae, norank_f__norank_o__Vicinamibacterales, and norank_f__norank_o__Gaiellales, while dominant fungal genera were Saitozyma, unclassified_k__Fungi, and Mortierella. (3) After landscape construction, the Shannon index of soil bacterial communities in woodland increased significantly (P < 0.05), while the Chao1 indices of bacterial and fungal communities in both woodland and grassland, as well as the Shannon index in grassland, showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). The Nestedness index of soil microorganisms showed a decreasing trend after construction, but, similar to the Turnover and total β-diversity indices, the changes were not significant(P > 0.05). (4) After landscape construction, the bacterial and fungal co-occurrence networks of both grassland and woodland exhibited a higher average degree and lower modularity, indicating more complex microbial interactions and enhanced cooperation among functional modules.
      Conclusion Landscape construction improved soil physicochemical properties and enzymatic activities, thereby indirectly regulating bacterial and fungal community structures and strengthening their correlations with soil nutrients and enzyme activities. These findings indicate that human-mediated landscape construction can optimize the soil ecological functional network, enhance ecosystem restoration capacity, and provide scientific support for the ecological restoration and health maintenance of the Liuxi River riparian zone.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回