高级检索
    丁玉凌, 徐书含, 刘文超, 等. 稻蛙生态种养模式碳足迹评价[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2024, 45(6): 1-10. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202406048
    引用本文: 丁玉凌, 徐书含, 刘文超, 等. 稻蛙生态种养模式碳足迹评价[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2024, 45(6): 1-10. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202406048
    shu
    DING Yuling, XU Shuhan, LIU Wenchao, et al. Carbon footprint assessment of rice-frog coculture system[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2024, 45(6): 1-10. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202406048
    Citation: DING Yuling, XU Shuhan, LIU Wenchao, et al. Carbon footprint assessment of rice-frog coculture system[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2024, 45(6): 1-10. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202406048
    shu

    稻蛙生态种养模式碳足迹评价

    Carbon footprint assessment of rice-frog coculture system

      摘要
    • 摘要:
      目的 通过开展稻蛙生态种养模式碳足迹系统性研究，以期为该模式的可持续发展提供科学依据和优化建议。
      方法 采用生命周期评价法，对常规水稻种植 (Traditional fertilization, TF ) 、绿色稻蛙种养(Green rice-frog coculture, GF) 和有机稻蛙种养 (Organic rice-frog coculture, OF)模式进行碳足迹评价。
      结果 GF和OF的单位面积碳足迹分别为5985.2和5632.99 kg CO2 e·hm−2，相比TF分别降低5.98%和11.51%，单位利润碳足迹分别下降45.1%和45.87%，单位营养密度碳足迹分别下降14.63%和12.17%。GF和OF提高了净生态系统经济效益 50%以上，其中GF高达71.77%。与TF相比，GF的产量与之无显著差异，OF的产量降低了16.73%；CH4排放分别增加了58.1%和131.18%，N2O排放分别降低了41.06%和63.12%，GF和OF具有更高的全球增温潜势和温室气体排放强度，其中OF的影响更为显著。GF和OF中，有机物料如紫云英、菜籽饼和有机肥的投入表现为净碳固定效应。碳足迹构成和敏感性分析显示，TF的碳足迹构成中，温室气体排放(57.07%)和化肥施用(32.88%)占比较高；OF的碳排放和固定均高于GF，CH4排放和尼龙防护网使用对GF和OF的贡献最大。不确定性分析表明，GF和OF的单位面积碳足迹分别为5907.29和5647.25 kg CO2 e·hm−2，低于TF，变异系数小于7.5%。
      结论 稻蛙共作模式(GF和OF)相较于TF模式具有更低的碳足迹，且具有更突出的碳固定效应和环境友好等特点，为气候变化背景下我国水稻产业的绿色低碳发展提供了新的科学依据。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective The carbon footprint of rice frog ecological breeding model was systematically studied in order to provide scientific basis and optimization suggestions for the sustainable development of this model.
      Method The carbon footprints of traditional fertilization (TF), green rice-frog coculture (GF) and organic rice-frog coculture (OF) modes were evaluated by life cycle assessment.
      Result The carbon footprints per unit area of GF and OF were 5985.2 and 5632.99 kg CO2 e·hm−2, which reduced by 5.98% and 11.51% compared with TF, the carbon footprints per unit profit decreased by 45.1% and 45.87%, and the carbon footprints per unit nutrient density decreased by 14.63% and 12.17%, respectively. GF and OF increased the net ecosystem economic benefits by above 50%, with 71.77% in GF. Compared with TF, the production of GF had no significant difference, while that of OF decreased by 16.73%. The CH4 emission increased by 58.13% and 131.18%, and the N2O emission decreased by 41.06% and 63.12% respectively. GF and OF had higher global warming potential and greenhouse gas emission intensity, among which the effect of OF was more significant. In GF and OF, the input of organic materials such as red cloud, rapeseed cake and organic fertilizer showed net carbon fixation effect. The carbon footprint composition and sensitivity analysis showed that greenhouse gas emission (57.07%) and fertilizer application (32.88%) accounted for the highest carbon footprint composition of TF. The carbon emission and fixation of OF were higher than those of GF, and the CH4 emission and use of nylon protective net contributed the most to GF and OF. Uncertainty analysis showed that the carbon footprints per unit area of GF and OF were 5907.29 and 5647.25 kg CO2 e·hm−2, respectively, which was lower than that of TF, and the coefficient of variation was less than 7.5%.
      Conclusion The rice-frog coculture modes (GF and OF) show a more significant carbon fixation and environment friendliness than TF mode, and provide a new scientific basis for green and low carbon development of rice industry in our country under the background of climate change.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(45)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回