不同放养密度稻虾综合种养模式的水质评估及经济效益评价

    Water quality assessment and economic benefit evaluation of integrated rice-red crayfish cultivation system under different stocking densities

    • 摘要:
      目的 比较不同放养密度稻虾综合种养模式与传统水稻单作模式的水体环境质量及经济效益,探索洞庭湖区稻虾种养的科学模式。
      方法 采用小区试验的方法,共设置3个处理:放养密度为300 kg·hm−2的低密度稻虾处理、放养密度为375 kg·hm−2的高密度稻虾处理和水稻单作处理。分别在水稻不同生长时期进行水样采集和理化性质分析,采用综合水质指数评价法对3种模式进行水体质量评价,同时比较不同模式的经济效益。
      结果 溶解性总固体含量、pH、NH4+−N含量、化学需氧量和溶解氧含量这5项水体理化指标是田间水质变化的主要影响因素。在成熟期,相较于低密度稻虾处理虾沟水体,高密度稻虾处理虾沟水体总N含量显著提升10.5%(P<0.05),总P含量上升3.6%,化学需氧量显著提升26.2%(P<0.05)。在水稻成熟期,低密度稻虾处理水体质量指数达到0.72,显著高于高密度稻虾处理(P<0.05)。成本和收益计算结果显示,稻虾综合种养模式的经济效益较水稻单作模式提升6~9倍,且低密度稻虾处理的经济效益是高密度稻虾处理的1.47倍。
      结论 在稻虾综合种养模式中选择合适的虾养殖密度,可有效降低农业面源污染、提高稻田经济效益和环境效益,具有较好的推广潜力。以上研究结果为洞庭湖区农业面源污染防治措施制定提供了数据支撑。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To compare the water environment quality and economic benefits of rice-red crayfish integrated cultivation model under different stocking densities and traditional rice monocropping model, and explore the scientific model of rice-red crayfish cultivation in Dongting Lake area.
      Method Using the method of plot experiment, three treatments were set up: Low density rice-red crayfish treatment with stocking density of 300 kg·hm−2, high density rice-red crayfish treatment with stocking density of 375 kg·hm−2 and rice monocropping treatment. Water samples were collected and their physico-chemical properties were analyzed at different growth stages of rice. Comprehensive water quality index evaluation method was used to evaluate the water quality of three models, and the economic benefits of different models were compared.
      Result Total dissolved solid content, pH, NH4+-N content, chemical oxygen demand, and dissolved oxygen content were the primary five factors affecting water quality changes. At ripening stage, compared to the ditch water of low density rice-red cayfish theatment, the ditch water of high density rice-red cayfish treatment showed increases of total N content by 10.5% (P<0.05), total P content by 3.6%, and chemical oxygen demand by 26.2% (P<0.05). At rice ripening stage, the water quality index of the low density rice-red cayfish treatment reached 0.72, significantly higher than that of high density rice-red cayfish treatment (P<0.05). The cost and benefit calculations showed that the integrated rice-crayfish model’s economic benefits were 6−9 times higher than that of rice monocropping model, and low density rice-red cayfish’s economic benefits were 1.47 times of high density rice-red cayfish treatment.
      Conclusion The suitable breeding density of red crayfish can effectively reduce the pollution of agricultural non-point sources, significantly increase the economic and envrionment benefits of rice fields, and have a good popularization potential. These findings provide a data support for formulating measures to prevent agricultural non-point source pollution in the Dongting Lake region.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回