姜来, 王英超, 霍晓静, 等. 基于红外图像的笼养白羽肉鸡体温检测方法[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2024, 45(2): 304-310. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202212024
    引用本文: 姜来, 王英超, 霍晓静, 等. 基于红外图像的笼养白羽肉鸡体温检测方法[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2024, 45(2): 304-310. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202212024
    JIANG Lai, WANG Yingchao, HUO Xiaojing, et al. Temperature detection method of caged white feather broilers based on infrared image[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2024, 45(2): 304-310. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202212024
    Citation: JIANG Lai, WANG Yingchao, HUO Xiaojing, et al. Temperature detection method of caged white feather broilers based on infrared image[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2024, 45(2): 304-310. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202212024

    基于红外图像的笼养白羽肉鸡体温检测方法

    Temperature detection method of caged white feather broilers based on infrared image

    • 摘要:
      目的 针对大规模笼养肉鸡体温自动检测困难的问题,提出一种深度学习与回归分析相结合的肉鸡体温检测方法。
      方法 采用红外热成像仪采集肉鸡的红外图像,通过YOLOv5s深度学习算法训练感兴趣区域(肉鸡鸡头)模型,分别引入多元线性回归和多元非线性回归以建立肉鸡感兴趣区域温度与翅下温度的预测模型,从而实现自动体温检测。
      结果 基于深度学习的感兴趣区域模型的精准率与召回率分别为93.8%和95.8%,多元线性回归温度预测模型1和多元非线性回归温度预测模型的平均相对误差分别为0.28%和0.27%,温度预测值与真实值的最大差值分别为0.34和0.32 ℃。
      结论 非线性模型预测肉鸡体温的准确率更高,可为日后舍内鸡只温度自动巡检设备提供技术支撑及前期研究基础。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To address the challenge of automatic temperature detection for large-scale caged broilers, a method combining deep learning and regression analysis was proposed.
      Method An infrared thermal imager was used to capture infrared images of broiler chickens, the YOLOv5s deep learning algorithm was used to train the model for the region of interest (broiler chicken head). Multiple linear regression and multiple nonlinear regression were respectively introduced to establish prediction models between the temperature of the broiler’s region of interest and the temperature under its wings, ultimately achieving the goal of automatic body temperature detection.
      Result The test results showed that the precision and recall of the region of interest model based on deep learning were 93.8% and 95.8% respectively. The average relative errors of the multiple linear regression 1 and multiple nonlinear regression temperature prediction models were 0.28% and 0.27% respectively, and the maximum differences between the predicted and actual temperature values were 0.34 and 0.32 ℃ respectively.
      Conclusion The nonlinear model has a higher accuracy rate in predicting the body temperature of broilers, providing technical support and a preliminary research basis for automated in-house temperature inspection equipment for chicken farming.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回