• 《中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)》来源期刊
  • 中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)期刊
  • 《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊

理化因素对非洲猪瘟病毒灭活效果的研究

龚浪, 孙英硕, 许润达, 陈熊男, 高琦, 黄钊, 陈孝军, 郑佳琛, 郭彦辰, 吴芮霞, 曾凡亮, 王衡, 张桂红

龚浪, 孙英硕, 许润达, 等. 理化因素对非洲猪瘟病毒灭活效果的研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2023, 44(3): 348-356. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202203044
引用本文: 龚浪, 孙英硕, 许润达, 等. 理化因素对非洲猪瘟病毒灭活效果的研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2023, 44(3): 348-356. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202203044
GONG Lang, SUN Yingshuo, XU Runda, et al. The inactivation effects of physicochemical factors on African swine fever virus[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2023, 44(3): 348-356. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202203044
Citation: GONG Lang, SUN Yingshuo, XU Runda, et al. The inactivation effects of physicochemical factors on African swine fever virus[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2023, 44(3): 348-356. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.202203044

理化因素对非洲猪瘟病毒灭活效果的研究

基金项目: 广东省重点领域研发计划(2019B020211003);国家自然科学基金(31941004);国家重点研发计划(2021YFD1800104);国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-35)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    龚浪,副教授,博士,主要从事动物传染病研究,E-mail: gonglang@scau.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    张桂红,教授,博士,主要从事动物传染病研究,E-mail: guihongzh@scau.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: S855

The inactivation effects of physicochemical factors on African swine fever virus

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    了解我国非洲猪瘟病毒(African swine fever virus,ASFV)的生物学特性及理化抗性,提高猪场生物安全水平以防控非洲猪瘟。

    方法 

    通过红细胞吸附试验和qPCR试验验证不同理化因素(包括静置、温度、UVC照射、室内外干燥、阳光暴晒和消毒剂)对ASFV的灭活效果。

    结果 

    UVC照射30 min即可灭活病毒,照射时间越长,ASFV核酸降解越严重;室内干燥2.5 d、室外干燥1.5 d、阳光暴晒30 min均可灭活ASFV,但不能降解ASFV核酸;常见消毒剂对ASFV的杀灭效果良好,各消毒剂按照推荐稀释浓度室温作用15或30 min,除碘酸混合溶液外均能使ASFV完全失活;温度升高(4、25和37 ℃)会增强消毒剂的消毒作用;有机物FBS的存在会削弱消毒剂的作用,且随FBS体积分数增加(0、10%和30%)消毒剂的消毒效果会降低。

    结论 

    本文系统研究了常见的理化因素对ASFV灭活效果的影响,有助于全面了解ASFV生物学特性,对非洲猪瘟的防控具有重要指导意义。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    The purpose of this research was to understand the biological characteristics and physicochemical resistance of African swine fever virus (ASFV) in China, so as to improve the biosafety level of pig farms for the prevention and control of African swine fever.

    Method 

    Hemadsorption test and qPCR test were used to verify the inactivation effects of different physicochemical factors (including static treatment, temperature, UVC irradiation, indoor and outdoor drying, sun exposure and disinfectant) on ASFV.

    Result 

    UVC irradiation for 30 min could inactivate the virus, the longer the irradiation time, the more serious degradation of ASFV nucleic acid. Indoor drying for 2.5 d, outdoor drying for 1.5 d or sun exposure for 30 min could inactivate ASFV, but these three physical factors had no effect on ASFV nucleic acid degradation. ASFV was susceptible to common disinfectants tested in study, except iodate mixed solution, all disinfectants could completely inactivate ASFV when treated at room temperature at the recommended diluted concentration for 15 or 30 min. An increase in temperature (4, 25 and 37 ℃) enhanced the inactivation effect of disinfectants. The presence of organic compound FBS could weaken the effect of disinfectants, and an increase in the volume fraction of FBS (0, 10% and 30%) could reduce the inactivation effect.

    Conclusion 

    This paper systematically studies the effects of common physicochemical factors on the inactivation of ASFV, which is helpful to fully understand the biological characteristics of ASFV, and has important guiding significance for clinical prevention and control of African swine fever.

  • 图  1   温度对5种消毒剂杀灭ASFV的影响

    白色圆圈代表红细胞吸附试验结果为阴性,红色圆圈代表红细胞吸附试验结果为阳性

    Figure  1.   Influence of temperature on the ASFV inactivation effect of five kinds of disinfectants

    White circle represents the negative result of the hemadsorption test, and red circle represents the positive result of the hemadsorption test

    图  2   不同体积分数FBS对5种消毒剂杀灭ASFV的影响

    白色圆圈代表红细胞吸附试验结果为阴性,红色圆圈代表红细胞吸附试验结果为阳性

    Figure  2.   Influence of FBS with different volume fractions on the ASFV inactivation effect of five kinds of disinfectants

    White circle represents the negative result of the hemadsorption test, and red circle represents the positive result of the hemadsorption test

    表  1   ASFV P72基因和猪β-actin基因的qPCR引物与探针

    Table  1   Primer and probe for qPCR of ASFV P72 gene and porcine β-actin gene

    引物/探针 Primer/probe 序列 Sequence 位置/bp Location
    ASFV F: 5′-CCC AGG RGA TAA AAT GAC TG-3′ 893~912
    R: 5′-CAC TRG TTC CCT CCA CCG ATA-3′ 940~960
    5′-/56-FAM/ GGC CAG GA /36-TAMSp/-3′ 930~937
    β-actin F: 5′-GGA TGC AGA AGG AGA TCA CG-3′ 1 022~1 041
    R: 5′-ATC TGC TGG AAG GTC GAC AG-3′ 1 132~1 151
    5′-/56-FAM/ GGC CAG GA/36-TAMSp/-3′ 1 121~1 128
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   ASFV在不同条件下静置的存活天数

    Table  2   Survival days of ASFV standing under different conditions d

    样品 Sample 4 ℃ 25 ℃ 37 ℃
    猪静脉血 Swine venous blood 14
    猪动脉血 Swine arterial blood 30
    纯水 Pure water 36 22 17
    生理盐水 Normal saline >75 >60 40
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   UVC照射对含FBS细胞培养液和细胞培养液中ASFV感染力的影响

    Table  3   Effect of UVC irradiation on ASFV infection in FBS-containing cell supernatant and cell supernatant

    培养液 Supernatant t/min 红细胞吸附1)Hemadsorption Ct
    含FBS细胞培养液 FBS-containing cell supernatant 0 + 26.65±0.37
    30 28.03±0.95
    60 29.32±0.72
    90 31.34±0.89
    120 32.44±1.11
    150 32.83±0.82
    180 32.77±0.91
    210 31.61±1.88
    细胞培养液 Cell supernatant 0 + 24.65±0.29
    3 + 22.12±1.59
    6 + 23.58±0.61
    9 + 24.01±0.82
    15 + 24.27±0.41
    20 + 25.02±0.65
    30 25.89±0.52
    40 27.54±1.28
    50 28.15±0.77
    60 30.16±0.39
     1)“+”:红细胞吸附,“−”:无红细胞吸附   1) “+”: Hemadsorption, “−”: No hemadsorption
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   室外和室内干燥环境对ASFV感染力的影响

    Table  4   Effects of outdoor and indoor drying environment on ASFV infection

    环境 Environment t/d 红细胞吸附1)Hemadsorption lg(病毒滴度)/ (HAD50·mL−1) lg(Virus titer) Ct
    室外 Outdoor 0 + 6.67±0.07 24.75±0.24
    0.5 + 3.38±0.33 24.86±0.65
    1.0 + 3.17±0.44 25.33±0.36
    1.5 + 1.59±0.26 25.48±0.71
    2.0 0 24.21±0.33
    2.5 0 24.18±0.72
    3.0 0 24.12±1.21
    4.0 0 24.74±1.47
    4.5 0 25.01±0.57
    5.0 0 25.67±0.78
    室内 Indoor 0 + 6.50±0.13 24.58±0.44
    0.5 + 3.67±0.56 24.62±0.58
    1.0 + 1.75±0.13 24.55±1.36
    2.0 + 0 25.60±0.87
    2.5 + 0 25.87±1.72
    3.0 0 25.02±0.65
    3.5 0 25.92±0.21
    4.0 0 27.54±1.28
    4.5 0 28.15±0.77
    5.0 0 30.16±0.39
     1)“+”:红细胞吸附,“−”:无红细胞吸附   1) “+”: Hemadsorption, “−”: No hemadsorption
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5   阳光暴晒对细胞培养液中ASFV感染力的影响

    Table  5   Effects of sun exposure on ASFV infection in cell supernatant

    t/min 红细胞吸附1)Hemadsorption lg(病毒滴度)/ (HAD50·mL−1) lg(Virus titer) Ct
    0 + 6.63±0.33 24.98±0.56
    5 + 6.55±0.38 24.35±1.09
    10 + 4.34±0.47 24.39±0.76
    15 + 2.71±0.29 25.10±0.35
    20 + 2.84±0.82 24.06±1.55
    30 1.67±0.19 24.53±0.93
    35 0 24.27±0.95
    50 0 24.98±0.79
    60 0 24.87±2.12
     1)“+”:红细胞吸附,“−”:无红细胞吸附   1) “+”: Hemadsorption, “−”: No hemadsorption
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6   消毒剂对ASFV红细胞吸附能力的影响

    Table  6   Effects of disinfectants on ASFV hemadsorption capacity

    名称 Name 类别 Classification 有效成分 Active ingredient 稀释倍数 Dilution ratio 红细胞吸附1)Hemadsorption
    15 min 30 min
    甲醛 Formaldehyde 醛类 Aldehydes 甲醛 Formaldehyde 1∶100
    1∶200
    1∶500
    柠檬酸 Citric acid 酸类 Acids 柠檬酸 Citric acid 1∶50
    1∶100
    1∶200 + +
    烧碱 Caustic soda 碱类 Alkalines 氢氧化钠 Sodium hydroxide 1∶50
    1∶100
    1∶200
    卫可 Virkon 氧化剂 Oxidizers 过硫酸氢钾 Potassium hydrogen persulfate 1∶200
    1∶400
    1∶800 + +
    84消毒液 84 disinfectant 氯制剂 Chlorine preparations 有效氯 Available chlorine 1∶100
    1∶200
    1∶400
    漂白粉 Bleaching powder 氯制剂 Chlorine preparations 次氯酸钙 Calcium hypochlorite 1∶250
    1∶500
    1∶1 000
    二氯异氰尿酸钠 Dichlorocyanuric acid 氯制剂 Chlorine preparations 有效氯 Available chlorine 1∶250
    1∶500
    1∶1 000
    百毒杀 Povidone iodine solution 季铵盐类 Quaternary ammonium salts 二癸基二甲基溴化铵 Didecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide 1∶300
    1∶600 + ±
    1∶1 200 + +
    戊二醛 Glutaraldehyde 醛类 Aldehydes 戊二醛 Glutaraldehyde 1∶1 000
    1∶2 000
    1∶5 000 +
    安灭杀 Anabasin 混合制剂 Mixed preparations 戊二醛、季铵盐 Glutaraldehyde, quaternary ammonium salt 1∶100
    1∶200
    1∶400
    复合酚 Compound phenol 混合制剂 Mixed preparations 酚、醋酸 Phenol, Ethylic acid 1∶100
    1∶200
    1∶400
    戊二醛癸甲溴铵溶液 Glutaral and deciquam solution 混合制剂 Mixed preparations 戊二醛、二癸基二甲基溴化铵 Glutaraldehyde, didecyl dimethyl ammonium bromide 1∶500
    1∶1 000
    1∶1 200
    复方戊二醛 Compound glutaraldehyde 混合制剂 Mixed preparations 戊二醛、苯扎氯铵 Glutaraldehyde, benzalkonium chloride 1∶150
    1∶300
    1∶600
    碘酸混合溶液 Iodine and acid mixed solution 混合制剂 Mixed preparations 碘、磷酸 Iodine, phosphoric acid 1∶100 + +
    1∶200 + +
    1∶400 + +
     1)“+”:红细胞吸附,“−”:无红细胞吸附   1) “+”: Hemadsorption, “−”: No hemadsorption
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    ALONSO C, BORCA M, DIXON L, et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Asfarviridae[J]. Journal of General Virology, 2018, 99(5): 613-614. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001049

    [2]

    DIXON L K, STAHL K, JORI F, et al. African swine fever epidemiology and control[J]. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 2020, 8: 221-246. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083741

    [3]

    NIEDERWERDER M C, STOIAN A M M, ROWLAND R R R, et al. Infectious dose of African swine fever virus when consumed naturally in liquid or feed[J]. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2019, 25(5): 891-897. doi: 10.3201/eid2505.181495

    [4]

    GALLARDO C, SÁNCHEZ E G, PÉREZ-NÚÑEZ D, et al. African swine fever virus (ASFV) protection mediated by NH/P68 and NH/P68 recombinant live-attenuated viruses[J]. Vaccine, 2018, 36(19): 2694-2704. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.040

    [5]

    MONTGOMERY R E. On a form of swine fever occurring in British East Africa (Kenya colony)[J]. Journal of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics, 1921, 34: 159-191. doi: 10.1016/S0368-1742(21)80031-4

    [6]

    JUSZKIEWICZ M, WALCZAK M, MAZUR-PANASIUK N, et al. Effectiveness of chemical compounds used against African swine fever virus in commercial available disinfectants[J]. Pathogens, 2020, 9(11): 878. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9110878.

    [7]

    ZHANG L, LUO Y, WANG W, et al. Efficient inactivation of African swine fever virus by ozonized water[J]. Veterinary Microbiology, 2020, 247: 108796. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108796.

    [8]

    OLESEN A S, BELSHAM G J, RASMUSSEN T B, et al. Potential routes for indirect transmission of African swine fever virus into domestic pig herds[J]. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 2020, 67(4): 1472-1484. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13538

    [9]

    JUSZKIEWICZ M, WALCZAK M, WOŹNIAKOWSKI G. Characteristics of selected active substances used in disinfectants and their virucidal activity against ASFV[J]. Journal of Veterinary Research, 2019, 63(1): 17-25. doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2019-0006

    [10]

    FERNANDEZ-PINERO J, GALLARDO C, ELIZALDE M, et al. Molecular diagnosis of African swine fever by a new real-time PCR using universal probe library[J]. Transboundary of Emergening Diseases, 2013, 60(1): 48-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2012.01317.x

    [11]

    KIM D K, KANGA D H. UVC LED irradiation effectively inactivates aerosolized viruses, bacteria, and fungi in a chamber-type air disinfection system[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2018, 84(17): e00944-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00944-18.

    [12]

    XU R, GONG L, WANG H, et al. Disinfection effect of short-wave ultraviolet radiation (UV-C) on ASFV in water[J]. Journal of Infection, 2020, 80(6): 686-687.

    [13]

    GONG L, XU R, WANG Z, et al. African swine fever recovery in China[J]. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 2020, 6(4): 890-893. doi: 10.1002/vms3.299

    [14]

    KRUG P W, DAVIS T, O’BRIEN C, et al. Disinfection of transboundary animal disease viruses on surfaces used in pork packing plants[J]. Veterinary Microbiology, 2018, 219: 219-225. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.04.029

    [15]

    KRUG P W, LARSON C R, ESLAMI A C, et al. Disinfection of foot-and-mouth disease and African swine fever viruses with citric acid and sodium hypochlorite on birch wood carriers[J]. Veterinary Microbiology, 2012, 156(1/2): 96-101.

    [16]

    HERNÁEZ B, GUERRA M, SALAS M L, et al. African swine fever virus undergoes outer envelope disruption, capsid disassembly and inner envelope fusion before core release from multivesicular endosomes[J]. PLoS Pathogens, 2016, 12(4): e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005595.

    [17]

    KALMAR I D, CAY A B, TIGNON M. Sensitivity of African swine fever virus (ASFV) to heat, alkalinity and peroxide treatment in presence or absence of porcine plasma[J]. Veterinary Microbiology, 2018, 219: 144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.04.025

  • 期刊类型引用(3)

    1. 秦国峰,刘根林. 84消毒液对非洲猪瘟病毒的杀灭效果. 上海畜牧兽医通讯. 2025(02): 19-20+24 . 百度学术
    2. 王量,刘敏,郭星辉,姚帆,段聪康,姚军. 猪场外围环境非洲猪瘟病毒阳性率的影响因素分析. 上海畜牧兽医通讯. 2024(01): 15-19 . 百度学术
    3. 邓毅,漆信桥,张继甫,张勋,周娜娜,徐志文,刘天强. 养猪场烟雾消毒机消毒效果评价. 中国猪业. 2024(04): 37-43 . 百度学术

    其他类型引用(1)

图(2)  /  表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  859
  • HTML全文浏览量:  78
  • PDF下载量:  57
  • 被引次数: 4
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-03-22
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-05-17
  • 刊出日期:  2023-05-09

目录

    Corresponding author: ZHANG Guihong, guihongzh@scau.edu.cn

    1. On this Site
    2. On Google Scholar
    3. On PubMed

    /

    返回文章
    返回