高级检索
    方旭元, 夏高峰, 石巧巧, 等. QuEChERS-GC-MS法检测当归中9种除草剂残留[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 79-83. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2017.06.012
    引用本文: 方旭元, 夏高峰, 石巧巧, 等. QuEChERS-GC-MS法检测当归中9种除草剂残留[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2017, 38(6): 79-83. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2017.06.012
    shu
    FANG Xuyuan, XIA Gaofeng, SHI Qiaoqiao, HE Can, YANG Xiaoyun, XU Hanhong. Detection of nine herbicide residues in Angelica sinensis by QuEChERS-GC-MS[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(6): 79-83. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2017.06.012
    Citation: FANG Xuyuan, XIA Gaofeng, SHI Qiaoqiao, HE Can, YANG Xiaoyun, XU Hanhong. Detection of nine herbicide residues in Angelica sinensis by QuEChERS-GC-MS[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2017, 38(6): 79-83. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2017.06.012
    shu

    QuEChERS-GC-MS法检测当归中9种除草剂残留

    Detection of nine herbicide residues in Angelica sinensis by QuEChERS-GC-MS

      摘要
    • 摘要:
      目的  建立当归中除草剂的残留分析方法。
      方法  阿特拉津、异恶草酮、乙草胺、扑草净、异丙甲草胺、二甲戊灵、丁草胺、丙草胺和乙氧氟草醚9种除草剂残留分析采用QuEChERS方法结合气相色谱-质谱联用仪。样品用乙腈提取，采用N–丙基乙二胺(PSA)和石墨化炭黑(GCB)净化，选择离子监测模式(SIM)进行检测，外标法定量。对影响提取和净化的参数进行优化。
      结果  在0.01~5.00 mg·L–1的范围内，各除草剂的峰面积与质量浓度呈良好的线性关系。在添加量分别为0.01和0.10 mg·kg–1的水平下，9种除草剂在当归样品中的平均回收率为74.58%~96.37%，相对标准偏差均低于11.73%，各除草剂的检出限范围为0.52~6.60 μg·kg–1。
      结论  该方法简单、快速、有效，能够用于实际当归样品中多种除草剂的残留检测。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective  To establish a method for analyzing herbicide residues in Angelica sinensis.
      Method  The residues of nine herbicides, including fenamine, clomazone, acetochlor, prometryn, metolachlor, pendimethalin, butachlor, pretilachlor and oxyfluorfen were analyzed by QuEChERS combined with GC-MS. Samples were extracted with acetonitrile and cleaned up using primary secondary amine (PSA) and graphitized carbon black (GCB). Nine herbicides were detected using the selective ion monitoring (SIM) mode and quantified with external standards. Parameters which influenced extraction and purification efficiency were optimized.
      Result  There were good linear relationships between herbicide concentration and detected peak area within the range from 0.01 to 5.00 mg·L-1 for all nine herbicides. The average recovery rates of nine herbicides in A. sinensis were from 74.58% to 96.37% at the addition levels of 0.01 and 0.10 mg·kg-1, with relative standard deviation less than 11.73%. The detection limits of nine herbicides were from 0.52 to 6.60 μg·kg-1.
      Conclusion  This detection method is simple, fast and effective, and can be used practically to detect a variety of herbicides in A. sinensis samples.

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(15)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回