- Chinese Core Journal
- Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) Source journal
- Journal of Citation Report of Chinese S&T Journals (Core Edition)
| Citation: |
LIU Yaoguang, LI Gousi, ZHANG Yaling, et al. Current advances on CRISPR/Cas genome editing technologies in plants[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(5): 38-49. DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201905058
|
Development of genome editing technologies provides efficient tools for functional genomics and crop molecular breeding. Owing to its simplicity and high efficiency, CRISPR/Cas systems, including CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cas12a, have been widely used for genome editing in many organisms. In this review, we summarize the recent advances on improvements and applications of CRISPR/Cas systems in plants, as well as the methods for analyzing targeted mutations in edited plants. Finally, we discuss current problems of CRISPR/Cas systems and give a prospect of genome editing technologies.
| [1] |
ZHANG Y, MA X, XIE X, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in plants [M]. Prog Mol Biol Transl, 2017, 149: 133-150.
|
| [2] |
李希陶, 刘耀光. 基因组编辑技术在水稻功能基因组和遗传改良中的应用[J]. 生命科学, 2016, 28(10): 1243-1249.
|
| [3] |
ISHINO Y, SHINAGAWA H, MAKINO K, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product[J]. J Bacteriol, 1987, 169(12): 5429-5433. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.12.5429-5433.1987
|
| [4] |
MOJICA F J, DIEZ-VILLASENOR C, SORIA E, et al. Biological significance of a family of regularly spaced repeats in the genomes of archaea, bacteria and mitochondria[J]. Mol Microbiol, 2000, 36(1): 244-246. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01838.x
|
| [5] |
MOJICA F J, FERRER C, JUEZ G, et al. Long stretches of short tandem repeats are present in the largest replicons of the archaea Haloferax mediterranei and Haloferax volcanii and could be involved in replicon partitioning[J]. Mol Microbiol, 1995, 17(1): 85-93. doi: 10.1111/mmi.1995.17.issue-1
|
| [6] |
JANSEN R, EMBDEN J D A V, GAASTRA W, et al. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes[J]. Mol Microbiol, 2002, 43(6): 1565-1575. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x
|
| [7] |
MOJICA F J M, DÍEZ-VILLASEÑOR C, GARCÍA-MARTÍNEZ J, et al. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements[J]. J Mol Evol, 2005, 60(2): 174-182. doi: 10.1007/s00239-004-0046-3
|
| [8] |
POURCEL C, SALVIGNOL G, VERGNAUD G. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies[J]. Microbiology, 2005, 151(3): 653-663. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27437-0
|
| [9] |
BOLOTIN A, OUINQUIS B, SOROKIN A, et al. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin[J]. Microbiology, 2005, 151(8): 2551-2561. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28048-0
|
| [10] |
BARRANGOU R, FREMAUX C, DEVEAU H, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5819): 1709-1712. doi: 10.1126/science.1138140
|
| [11] |
SOREK R, KUNIN V, HUGENHOLTZ P. CRISPR: A widespread system that provides acquired resistance against phages in bacteria and archaea[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2008, 6(3): 181-186. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1793
|
| [12] |
MARRAFFINI L A, SONTHEIMER E J. CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5909): 1843-1845. doi: 10.1126/science.1165771
|
| [13] |
DEVEAU H, BARRANGOU R, GARNEAU J E, et al. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus[J]. J Bacteriol, 2008, 190(4): 1390-1400. doi: 10.1128/JB.01412-07
|
| [14] |
GARNEAU J E, DUPUIS M E, VILLION M, et al. The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA[J]. Nature, 2010, 468(7320): 67-71. doi: 10.1038/nature09523
|
| [15] |
JINEK M, CHYLINSKI K, FONFARA I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6096): 816-821. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829
|
| [16] |
GRISSA I, VERGNAUD G, POURCEL C. CRISPRFinder: A web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2007, 35(Web server issue): W52-W57. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm360
|
| [17] |
MAKAROVA K S, HAFT D H, BARRANGOU R, et al. Evolution and classification of the CRISPR-Cas systems[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2011, 9(6): 467-477. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2577
|
| [18] |
CONG L, RAN F A, COR D, et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 819-823. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143
|
| [19] |
MAKAROVA K S, KOONIN E V. Annotation and classification of CRISPR-Cas systems[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2015, 1311: 47-75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2687-9
|
| [20] |
SHMAKOV S, ABUDAYYEH O O, MAKAROVA K S, et al. Discovery and functional characterization of diverse class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems[J]. Mol Cell, 2015, 60(3): 385-397. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.008
|
| [21] |
GRATZ S J, CUMMINGS A M, NGUYEN J N, et al. Genome engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-Guided cas9 nuclease[J]. Genetics, 2013, 194(4): 1029-1035. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.152710
|
| [22] |
JINEK M, EAST A, CHENG A, et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells[J]. eLife, 2013, 2: e00471.
|
| [23] |
CHO S W, KIM S, KIM J M, et al. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(3): 230-232. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2507
|
| [24] |
HWANG W Y, FU Y, REYON D, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(3): 227-229. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2501
|
| [25] |
MALI P, YANG L, ESVELT K M, et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 823-826. doi: 10.1126/science.1232033
|
| [26] |
FENG Z, ZHANG B, DING W, et al. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system[J]. Cell Res, 2013, 23(10): 1229-1232. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.114
|
| [27] |
MAO Y, ZHANG H, XU N, et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants[J]. Mol Plant, 2013, 6(6): 2008-2011. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst121
|
| [28] |
XIE K, YANG Y. RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Mol Plant, 2013, 6(6): 1975-1983. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst119
|
| [29] |
FU Y, FODEN J A, KHAYTER C, et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 822-826. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2623
|
| [30] |
SHAN Q, WANG Y, LI J, et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(8): 686-688. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2650
|
| [31] |
YIN K, GAO C, QIU J. Progress and prospects in plant genome editing[J]. Nat Plants, 2017, 3(8): 17107. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.107
|
| [32] |
LIU X, XIE C, SI H, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in plants[J]. Methods, 2017, 121/122: 94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.03.009
|
| [33] |
SOYARS C L, PETERSON B A, BURR C A, et al. Cutting edge genetics: CRISPR/Cas9 editing of plant genomes[J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 2018, 59(8): 1608-1620. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy079
|
| [34] |
SONG G, JIA M, CHEN K, et al. CRISPR/Cas9: A powerful tool for crop genome editing[J]. Crop J, 2016, 4(2): 75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.12.002
|
| [35] |
SCHAEFFER S M, NAKATA P A. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: Transitioning from lab to field[J]. Plant Sci, 2015, 240: 130-142. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.011
|
| [36] |
ZETSCHE B, GOOTENBERG J S, ABUDAYYEH O O, et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Cell, 2015, 163(3): 759-771. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038
|
| [37] |
MAHFOUZ M M. Genome editing: The efficient tool CRISPR-Cpf1[J]. Nat Plants, 2017, 3: 17028. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.28
|
| [38] |
ZAIDI S S, MAHFOUZ M M, MANSOOR S. CRISPR-Cpf1: A new tool for plant genome editing[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2017, 22(7): 550-553. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.05.001
|
| [39] |
ENDO A, MASAFUMI M, KAYA H, et al. Efficient targeted mutagenesis of rice and tobacco genomes using Cpf1 from Francisella novicida[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 38169.
|
| [40] |
HU X, WANG C, LIU Q, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cpf1 system[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2017, 44(1): 71-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.12.001
|
| [41] |
WANG M, MAO Y, LU Y, et al. Multiplex gene editing in rice using the CRISPR-Cpf1 system[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(7): 1011-1013. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.001
|
| [42] |
TANG X, LOWDER L G, ZHANG T, et al. A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants[J]. Nat Plants, 2017, 3: 17018.
|
| [43] |
XU R, QIN R, LI H, et al. Generation of targeted mutant rice using a CRISPR-Cpf1 system[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2017, 15(6): 713-717. doi: 10.1111/pbi.2017.15.issue-6
|
| [44] |
BEGEMANN M B, GRAY B N, JANUARY E, et al. Precise insertion and guided editing of higher plant genomes using Cpf1 CRISPR nucleases[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 11606.
|
| [45] |
LI S, ZHANG X, WANG W, et al. Expanding the scope of CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated genome editing in rice[J]. Mol Plant, 2018, 11(7): 995-998. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.03.009
|
| [46] |
MALZAHN A A, TANG X, LEE K, et al. Application of CRISPR-Cas12a temperature sensitivity for improved genome editing in rice, maize, and Arabidopsis[J]. BMC Biol, 2019, 17(1): 9.
|
| [47] |
KIM H, KIM S, RYU J, et al. CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated DNA-free plant genome editing[J]. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 14406. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14406
|
| [48] |
FENG Z, MAO Y, XU N, et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111(12): 4632-4637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400822111
|
| [49] |
MA X, ZHANG Q, ZHU Q, et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(8): 1274-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.007
|
| [50] |
马兴亮, 刘耀光. 植物CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑系统与突变分析[J]. 遗传, 2016(2): 118-125.
|
| [51] |
ANDERSSON M, TURESSON H, NICOLIA A, et al. Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplasts[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2017, 36(1): 117-128. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-2062-3
|
| [52] |
ZHANG Y, LIANG Z, ZONG Y, et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 12617.
|
| [53] |
ZHOU H, LIU B, WEEKS D P, et al. Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014, 42(17): 10903-10914. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku806
|
| [54] |
ORDON J, GANTNER J, KEMNA J, et al. Generation of chromosomal deletions in dicotyledonous plants employing a user-friendly genome editing toolkit[J]. Plant J, 2017, 89(1): 155-168. doi: 10.1111/tpj.2017.89.issue-1
|
| [55] |
CHO S, YU S, PARK J, et al. Accession-dependent CBF gene deletion by CRISPR/Cas system in arabidopsis[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1910.
|
| [56] |
WANG F, WANG C, LIU P, et al. Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e154027.
|
| [57] |
ZHOU J, PENG Z, LONG J, et al. Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice[J]. Plant J, 2015, 82(4): 632-643. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12838
|
| [58] |
TANG L, MAO B, LI Y, et al. Knockout of OsNramp5 using the CRISPR/Cas9 system produces low Cd-accumulating indica rice without compromising yield[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 14438.
|
| [59] |
XIE Y, NIU B, LONG Y, et al. Suppression or knockout of SaF/SaM overcomes the Sa-mediated hybrid male sterility in rice[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2017, 59(9): 669-679. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12564
|
| [60] |
SHEN R, WANG L, LIU X, et al. Genomic structural variation-mediated allelic suppression causes hybrid male sterility in rice[J]. Nat Commun, 2017, 8: 1310.
|
| [61] |
XIE Y, XU P, HUANG J, et al. Interspecific hybrid sterility in rice is mediated by OgTPR1 at the S1 locus encoding a peptidase-like protein[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(8): 1137-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.05.005
|
| [62] |
XIE Y, TANG J, XIE X, et al. An asymmetric allelic interaction drives allele transmission bias in interspecific rice hybrids[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 2501.
|
| [63] |
LI Q, ZHANG D, CHEN M, et al. Development of japonica photo-sensitive genic male sterile rice lines by editing carbon starved anther using CRISPR/Cas9[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2016, 43(6): 415-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.04.011
|
| [64] |
ZHOU H, HE M, LI J, et al. Development of commercial thermo-sensitive genic male sterile rice accelerates hybrid rice breeding using the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated TMS5 editing system[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 37395.
|
| [65] |
LI X, ZHOU W, REN Y, et al. High-efficiency breeding of early-maturing rice cultivars via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2017, 44(3): 175-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2017.02.001
|
| [66] |
LI M, LI X, ZHOU Z, et al. Reassessment of the four yield-related genes Gn1a, DEP1, GS3, and IPA1 in rice using a CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 377.
|
| [67] |
SHEN L, HUA Y, FU Y, et al. Rapid generation of genetic diversity by multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in rice[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2017, 60(5): 506-515. doi: 10.1007/s11427-017-9008-8
|
| [68] |
XU R, YANG Y, QIN R, et al. Rapid improvement of grain weight via highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing in rice[J]. J Genet Genomics, 2016, 43(8): 529-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.07.003
|
| [69] |
SUN Y, JIAO G, LIU Z, et al. Generation of high-amylose rice through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of starch branching enzymes[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 298.
|
| [70] |
ZHANG J, ZHANG H, BOTELLA J R, et al. Generation of new glutinous rice by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the Waxy gene in elite rice varieties[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2018, 60(5): 369-375. doi: 10.1111/jipb.v60.5
|
| [71] |
SUN Y, ZHANG X, WU C, et al. Engineering herbicide-resistant rice plants through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination of acetolactate synthase[J]. Mol Plant, 2016, 9(4): 628-631. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.001
|
| [72] |
LI J, MENG X, ZONG Y, et al. Gene replacements and insertions in rice by intron targeting using CRISPR-Cas9[J]. Nat Plants, 2016, 2: 16139.
|
| [73] |
LI C, ZONG Y, WANG Y, et al. Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion[J]. Genome Biol, 2018, 19: 59.
|
| [74] |
LU Y, ZHU J. Precise editing of a target base in the rice genome using a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(3): 523-525. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.11.013
|
| [75] |
LUO M, GILBERT B, AYLIFFE M. Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology for targeted mutagenesis, gene replacement and stacking of genes in higher plants[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2016, 35(7): 1439-1450. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1989-8
|
| [76] |
WANG M, LU Y, BOTELLA J R, et al. Gene targeting by homology-directed repair in rice using a geminivirus-based CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(7): 1007-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.002
|
| [77] |
MIKI D, ZHANG W, ZENG W, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting in Arabidopsis using sequential transformation[J]. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 1967.
|
| [78] |
KOMOR A C, KIM Y B, PACKER M S, et al. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage[J]. Nature, 2016, 533(7603): 420-424. doi: 10.1038/nature17946
|
| [79] |
GAUDELLI N M, KOMOR A C, REES H A, et al. Programmable base editing of A·T to G·C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage[J]. Nature, 2017, 551(7681): 464-471. doi: 10.1038/nature24644
|
| [80] |
LI J, SUN Y, DU J, et al. Generation of targeted point mutations in rice by a modified CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(3): 526-529. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.12.001
|
| [81] |
SHIMATANI Z, KASHOJIYA S, TAKAYAMA M, et al. Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2017, 35(5): 441-443. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3833
|
| [82] |
ZONG Y, WANG Y, LI C, et al. Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2017, 35(5): 438-440. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3811
|
| [83] |
CHEN Y, WANG Z, NI H, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing system efficiently generates gain-of-function mutations in Arabidopsis[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2017, 60(5): 520-523. doi: 10.1007/s11427-017-9021-5
|
| [84] |
HUA K, TAO X, YUAN F, et al. Precise A·T to G·C base editing in the rice genome[J]. Mol Plant, 2018, 11(4): 627-630. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.007
|
| [85] |
YAN F, KUANG Y, REN B, et al. Highly efficient A·T to G·C base editing by Cas9n-guided tRNA adenosine deaminase in rice[J]. Mol Plant, 2018, 11(4): 631-634. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.02.008
|
| [86] |
KANG B, YUN J, KIM S, et al. Precision genome engineering through adenine base editing in plants[J]. Nat Plants, 2018, 4(7): 427-431. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0178-x
|
| [87] |
REN B, YAN F, KUANG Y, et al. Improved base editor for efficiently inducing genetic variations in rice with CRISPR/Cas9-guided hyperactive hAID mutant[J]. Mol Plant, 2018, 11(4): 623-626. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.01.005
|
| [88] |
LI X, XIE Y, ZHU Q, et al. Targeted genome editing in genes and cis-regulatory regions improves qualitative and quantitative traits in crops[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(11): 1368-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.10.009
|
| [89] |
RODRIGUEZ-LEAL D, LEMMON Z H, MAN J, et al. Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing[J]. Cell, 2017, 171(2): 470. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.030
|
| [90] |
PUCHTA H. Using CRISPR/Cas in three dimensions: Towards synthetic plant genomes, transcriptomes and epigenomes[J]. Plant J, 2016, 87(1): 5-15. doi: 10.1111/tpj.2016.87.issue-1
|
| [91] |
PIATEK A, ALI Z, BAAZIM H, et al. RNA-guided transcriptional regulation[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2015, 13(4): 578-589. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12284
|
| [92] |
LOWDER L G, ZHANG D, BALTES N J, et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation[J]. Plant Physiol, 2015, 169(2): 971-985. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00636
|
| [93] |
LI Z, ZHANG D, XIONG X, et al. A potent Cas9-derived gene activator for plant and mammalian cells[J]. Nat Plants, 2017, 3(12): 930-936. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0046-0
|
| [94] |
MA X, CHEN L, ZHU Q, et al. Rapid decoding of sequence-specific nuclease-induced heterozygous and biallelic mutations by direct sequencing of PCR products[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(8): 1285-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.02.012
|
| [95] |
LIU W, XIE X, MA X, et al. DSDecode: A web-based tool for decoding of sequencing chromatograms for genotyping of targeted mutations[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(9): 1431-1433. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.05.009
|
| [96] |
XIE X, MA X, ZHU Q, et al. CRISPR-GE: A convenient software toolkit for CRISPR-based genome editing[J]. Mol Plant, 2017, 10(9): 1246-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.06.004
|
| [97] |
XUE L J, TSAI C J. AGEseq: Analysis of genome editing by sequencing[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(9): 1428-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.001
|
| [98] |
PARK J, LIM K, KIM J, et al. Cas-analyzer: An online tool for assessing genome editing results using NGS data[J]. Bioinformatics, 2017, 33(2): 286-288. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw561
|
| [99] |
GUELL M, YANG L, CHURCH G M. Genome editing assessment using CRISPR genome analyzer (CRISPR-GA)[J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(20): 2968-2970. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu427
|
| [100] |
PINELLO L, CANVER M C, HOBAN M D, et al. Analyzing CRISPR genome-editing experiments with CRISPResso[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2016, 34(7): 695-697. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3583
|
| [101] |
LIU Q, WANG C, JIAO X, et al. Hi-TOM: A platform for high-throughput tracking of mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas systems[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2019, 62(1): 1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9402-9
|
| [102] |
LLOYD A, PLAISIER C L, CARROLL D, et al. Targeted mutagenesis using zinc-finger nucleases in Arabidopsis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102(6): 2232-2237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409339102
|
| [103] |
VOYTAS D F. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases [M]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2013: 64, 327-350.
|
| [104] |
GUSCHIN D Y, WAITE A J, KATIBAH G E, et al. A rapid and general assay for monitoring endogenous gene modification [M]. Method Mol Biol, 2010, 649: 247-256.
|
| [105] |
ZHENG X, YANG S, ZHANG D, et al. Effective screen of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants in rice by single-strand conformation polymorphism[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2016, 35(7): 1545-1554. doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1967-1
|
| [106] |
HSU P D, SCOTT D A, WEINSTEIN J A, et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 827-832. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2647
|
| [107] |
ANDERSON K R, HAEUSSLER M, WATANABE C, et al. CRISPR off-target analysis in genetically engineered rats and mice[J]. Nat Methods, 2018, 15(7): 512-514. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0011-5
|
| [108] |
ZHANG H, ZHANG J, WEI P, et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2014, 12(6): 797-807. doi: 10.1111/pbi.2014.12.issue-6
|
| [109] |
TANG X, LIU G, ZHOU J, et al. A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals highly specific genome editing by both Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) nucleases in rice[J]. Genome Biol, 2018, 19: 84.
|
| [110] |
NEKRASOV V, WANG C, WIN J, et al. Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 482.
|
| [111] |
LI J, MANGHWAR H, SUN L, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals rare off-target mutations and considerable inherent genetic or/and somaclonal variations in CRISPR/Cas9-edited cotton plants[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2019, 17(5): 858-868. doi: 10.1111/pbi.2019.17.issue-5
|
| [112] |
ZUO E, SUN Y, WEI W, et al. Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 289-292.
|
| [113] |
JIN S, ZONG Y, GAO Q, et al. Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 292-295.
|
| [114] |
FU Y, SANDER J D, REYON D, et al. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2014, 32(3): 279-284. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2808
|
| [115] |
CHO S W, KIM S, KIM Y, et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases[J]. Genome Res, 2014, 24(1): 132-141. doi: 10.1101/gr.162339.113
|
| [116] |
PATTANAYAK V, LIN S, GUILINGER J P, et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2013, 31(9): 839-843. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2673
|
| [117] |
ZHANG D, ZHANG H, LI T, et al. Perfectly matched 20-nucleotide guide RNA sequences enable robust genome editing using high-fidelity SpCas9 nucleases[J]. Genome Biol, 2017, 18: 191.
|
| [118] |
SVITASHEV S, SCHWARTZ C, LENDERTS B, et al. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7: 13274.
|
| [119] |
MIRCETIC J, STEINEBRUNNER I, DING L, et al. Purified Cas9 fusion proteins for advanced genome manipulation[J]. Small Methods, 2017, 1: 1600052. doi: 10.1002/smtd.v1.4
|
| [120] |
SLAYMAKER I M, GAO L, ZETSCHE B, et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity[J]. Science, 2015, 351(6268): 84-88.
|
| [121] |
KLEINSTIVER B P, PATTANAYAK V, PREW M S, et al. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects[J]. Nature, 2016, 529(7587): 490-495. doi: 10.1038/nature16526
|
| [122] |
TANG J, CHEN L, LIU Y. Off-target effects and the solution[J]. Nat Plants, 2019, 5(4): 341-342. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0406-z
|
| [123] |
AKCAKAYA P, BOBBIN M L, GUO J A, et al. In vivo CRISPR editing with no detectable genome-wide off-target mutations[J]. Nature, 2018, 561: 416-419. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0500-9
|
| [124] |
WIENERT B, WYMAN S K, RICHARDSON C D, et al. Unbiased detection of CRISPR off-targets in vivo using DISCOVER-Seq[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 286.
|
| [125] |
JUN R, XIXUN H, KEJIAN W, et al. Development and application of CRISPR/Cas system in rice[J]. Rice Sci, 2019, 26(2): 69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2019.01.001
|
| 1. |
任嘉颖. 农业物联网技术在农业机械装备中的应用研究. 南方农机. 2025(02): 60-62 .
| |
| 2. |
王晓锋，杨硕，闫宝歧，葛晓，谭昌伟，刘忠强. 数字育种关键技术研究现状与发展路径. 蔬菜. 2025(Z1): 1-12 .
| |
| 3. |
赵自强. 智慧农业背景下农业智能传感器应用现状分析. 安徽农学通报. 2024(01): 106-109 .
| |
| 4. |
肖德琴，黄一桂，熊悦淞，刘俊彬，谭祖杰，吕斯婷. 畜禽机器人技术研究进展与未来展望. 华南农业大学学报. 2024(05): 624-634+620 .
本站查看
| |
| 5. |
章子文，梁思程，张洪奇，吴勇，张大磊，柳平增. 设施温室物联网智能测控系统研究. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(04): 633-643 .
| |
| 6. |
杨睿，商晓剑，王静. 基于数字孪生技术的烤烟植物工厂种植模型构建与应用. 湖北农业科学. 2024(08): 104-108+115 .
| |
| 7. |
王少聪，杜肖鹏，丁小明，王会强，李恺，何芬，张勇，牛树启，付媛，冯阔，邓浩楠. 温室巡检机器人关键技术研究进展与展望. 江苏农业科学. 2024(16): 1-10 .
| |
| 8. |
卢君宜. 基于物联感知技术的农田信息采集机器人研究进展. 产业创新研究. 2024(18): 104-106 .
| |
| 9. |
彭金莲，李奇，郑兵，邓佳磊，卓书龙，季祥. 基于不同目标检测模型的胡椒园环境下胡椒果穗成熟度判别研究. 中国热带农业. 2024(05): 42-53 .
| |
| 10. |
翟天昶，胡冰川. 农村流通体系的突出问题及完善方向. 农业农村部管理干部学院学报. 2024(03): 47-55 .
| |
| 11. |
赵赫，李卫国，杨止谦. 基于改进YOLOv4的降雨天气下番茄目标与抓取位置检测. 江苏农业科学. 2023(01): 202-210 .
| |
| 12. |
李洪兵，罗洋，张颖，王雨凝，欧俊，崔浩. 基于模糊PID控制的NB-IoT果蔬农业物联网系统设计与试验. 中国农机化学报. 2023(01): 162-171 .
| |
| 13. |
饶申，鲍玲玲，万云奕，徐欢. 基于大数据系统模型的灌溉决策系统研究. 智慧农业导刊. 2023(07): 11-13 .
| |
| 14. |
李鸿基，张哲，瞿济伟，奚小波，张瑞宏，郭康权. 农田信息采集机器人物联感知技术应用研究进展. 江苏农业科学. 2023(12): 20-34 .
| |
| 15. |
赵春江. 农业知识智能服务技术综述. 智慧农业(中英文). 2023(02): 126-148 .
| |
| 16. |
钱宗斌. 基于ModBus协议的STM32单片机与MCGS通信设计. 电脑知识与技术. 2023(22): 88-90 .
| |
| 17. |
胡建平，赵新宇，冯汝广，范国华，赵翠敏. 传感器在设施农业中的应用. 南方农机. 2023(19): 59-61+91 .
| |
| 18. |
姚丹丹，黄立胜，姜洪雪，林思亮，冯志勇. 广东省农区鼠类物联网智能监测系统的应用研究. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志. 2022(02): 273-276 .
| |
| 19. |
李炜，朱德利，王青，曾绍华. 监测生长状态和环境响应的作物数字孪生系统研究综述. 中国农业科技导报. 2022(06): 90-105 .
| |
| 20. |
何勋，陈旭，屈哲，兰明明，王万章. 小麦收获智能化技术应用研究进展. 河南农业大学学报. 2022(03): 341-354 .
| |
| 21. |
王康，郑泳杰，张真，唐燕平，宋文豪，郭晓明. 公共机构节水监测及用水管理技术研究与应用. 人民珠江. 2022(06): 45-52 .
| |
| 22. |
孙翔，裴晓芳，周望，朱平. 基于标尺图像识别的作物株高测量. 电子科技. 2022(07): 32-39 .
| |
| 23. |
栗云鹏，施玉峰，巫彬芳，周华，施震渺，李松浩，徐海涛，兰玉彬，龙拥兵. 金纳米颗粒和多壁碳纳米管协同增敏的维生素C传感器的研制与应用. 华南农业大学学报. 2022(05): 115-123 .
本站查看
| |
| 24. |
何建强，弓开元，李毅，吴淑芳，张体彬，董勤各，冯浩，于强. 农业系统模拟方法在农科院校大学生知识体系中的作用. 高等农业教育. 2022(04): 75-82 .
| |
| 25. |
刘君，王学伟. 智慧农业驱动蔬菜产业变革研究. 中国瓜菜. 2022(12): 100-108 .
| |
| 26. |
辛明华，韩迎春，王国平，王占彪，冯璐，雷亚平，杨北方，李小飞，范正义，熊世武，邢芳芳，李亚兵. Surfer绘制等值线图在棉田智能监测中的应用. 中国棉花. 2021(08): 37-39+46-47 .
| |
| 27. |
李海军. 新常态下农情工作转型创新发展思考. 南方农业. 2021(23): 235-236 .
| |
| 28. |
彭汉艮，王宝佳，魏祥帅，尚芬芬，姜舒文. 江苏省农业物联网管理服务平台建设成效及应用潜力分析. 江苏农机化. 2021(06): 7-10 .
| |
| 29. |
任婷婷，辛庆强，吕猷，赵俊利. 内蒙古农业知识服务智库平台的设计与开发. 北方农业学报. 2020(06): 129-134 .
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: