融合多源数据的PRRSV时空风险预测框架研究

    A spatiotemporal risk prediction framework for PRRSV based on multisource data integration

    • 摘要:
      目的 提出并验证一种融合流行病学、环境因子与系统发育动力学数据的猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus,PRRSV)时空风险预测框架,以弥补现有传播风险模型在动态捕捉传播过程和量化风险梯度方面的不足。
      方法 构建多维特征体系,并以连续型风险评分统一量化省级行政区−月份尺度的传播风险;采用经典基线模型(Gradient boosting)、传统机器学习模型(SVR、SVR-L、XGBoost)和深度学习模型(LSTM、Transformer)开展对比试验,并通过分省级行政区交叉验证和滚动时间窗口验证评估模型性能。
      结果 6种模型采用连续型风险评分标签的平均绝对误差(Mean absolute error, MAE)均低于采用传统二分类标签。系统发育/传播特征和历史特征是模型性能的核心信息来源,二者单独使用时分别可恢复全特征模型93.6%和90.3%的预测性能。在工程化特征条件下,随着训练数据比例由20%增加至100%,Transformer模型的MAE由约0.39降至0.09;LSTM模型MAE由约0.14将至0.07。在各行政区的验证中,XGBoost和Gradient boosting表现出较强的整体稳健性,Transformer在河南、山东等行政区表现出一定的区域适配性。
      结论 本研究构建的时空风险预测框架能够提升PRRSV传播风险预测精度和小样本数据利用效率,为PRRSV及其他动物疫病的精准防控提供方法学参考。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To propose and validate a spatiotemporal risk prediction framework for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) by integrating epidemiological, environmental factors, and phylodynamic data, thereby addressing the limitations of existing transmission risk models in dynamically capturing transmission processes and quantifying risk gradients.
      Method A multidimensional feature system was constructed, and a continuous risk score was used to consistently quantify transmission risk at the “provincial level administrative region-month” scale. Comparative experiments were performed using a classical baseline model (Gradient boosting), traditional machine learning models (SVR, SVR-L, and XGBoost), and deep learning models (LSTM and Transformer). Model performance was further evaluated by provincial level administrative region-wise cross-validation and rolling time-window validation.
      Result All six models yielded lower mean absolute error (MAE) values when continuous risk score labels were used than when conventional binary labels were used. Phylodynamic/transmission features and historical features were the principal sources of information contributing to model performance; When used independently, they recovered 93.6% and 90.3% of the predictive performance of the full-feature baseline model, respectively. When engineered features were used and the training data proportion increased from 20% to 100%, the MAE of the Transformer model decreased from approximately 0.39 to 0.09, while that of the LSTM model decreased from approximately 0.14 to 0.07. In validation across provincial-level administrative regions, XGBoost and Gradient boosting exhibited strong overall robustness, whereas the Transformer model showed regional adaptability in Henan, Shandong and other regions.
      Conclusion The proposed spatiotemporal risk prediction framework improves the accuracy of PRRSV transmission risk prediction and enhances the utilization efficiency of small-sample data, providing a methodological reference for the targeted prevention and control of PRRSV and other animal infectious diseases.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回